Pixel Starships 2

About

Pixel Starships 2 is a single player and multiplayer role playing game with a science fiction theme. It was developed by SavySoda and was released on August 27, 2025. It received negative reviews from players.

Build and battle starships in the ultimate space strategy game!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+10

Skip User Reviews

24%

Audience ScoreBased on 168 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

stability27 negative mentions

The game has potential and offers a unique concept with spaceship management and 3D combat.
Some players appreciate the new graphics and the effort put into the game's design, hoping for future improvements.
The community is engaged, and developers are responsive to feedback, indicating a willingness to address issues.

The game is plagued with numerous bugs and glitches, making it nearly unplayable, especially during the tutorial.
Many players feel the game is heavily monetized with pay-to-win elements, detracting from the overall experience.
The transition from the original Pixel Starships to this sequel has disappointed many fans, as it lacks the charm and functionality of its predecessor.

stability
27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is currently a significant issue, with numerous reports of crashes, glitches, and game-breaking bugs that detract from the overall experience. While some players acknowledge the potential and ongoing improvements from developers, many recommend waiting for further updates before investing time or money, as the game remains in a notably buggy state. Overall, the consensus is that while the game shows promise, its current instability hampers gameplay significantly.
- “While I'm sure the developers are working to get it going as quickly as possible, there are game-breaking bugs and glitches that are sure to ruin your experience.”
- “The game is currently a bit buggy, but don't worry I understand it's a new game and in early access as I saw on its Steam profile.”
- “Data didn't save from the demo despite the fact you could link your email in the demo, also the prologue was extremely buggy causing me to restart the game 4 times and being completely soft locked after being forced to restart after the PvP mission.”
graphics
27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
74%
11%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the new 3D style and increased detail, while others criticize the inconsistent art direction and the clash between old pixel art and new designs. Many feel that the graphics lack cohesion, detracting from the overall experience, and some believe that the game would have benefited from sticking to its original pixelated charm. Despite the potential for improvement, the graphics are seen as a significant point of contention among players.
- “I think there's a fantastic effort gone into this with graphics, artwork, and a cute soundtrack.”
- “This isn't a triple-A game nor is it from a very big studio, and as far as I'm aware, this is their first 3D game, so there really shouldn't be any complaining about it. The graphics are fine and honestly a refreshing sight, seeing that everyone is chasing near-perfect realism.”
- “The game is fun so far, but buggy as I mentioned earlier. I like the new graphics; it doesn't have to be very pixelated like the first game, and it still has pixels, but a lot more. That's why the details of ships and space stations are great. Don't change the graphics, just fix the bugs. I recommend playing the game, and I like how it's in 3D.”
- “The graphics are questionable.”
- “Reworked graphics mixed with graphics from 2000.”
- “The new 3D art style is simply horrendous; it's like playing a PS2 knockoff from Temu.”
story
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
68%
16%
The story in the game is described as quirky and humorous, reminiscent of its predecessor, but marred by numerous bugs and unclear mission structures that hinder progression. While some characters and aesthetics are appreciated, the overall narrative experience is overshadowed by technical issues and a perceived pay-to-win model, leading to frustration among players. Many feel that the story could be improved or even removed, as it currently feels disjointed and poorly integrated with gameplay.
- “I like the aesthetics, especially some of the characters like Delores. As with Pixel Starships 1, the storylines are quirky and funny, if you ever get that far!”
- “Although as others have said, it is basically Pixel Starships 1 with the ships having a new 3D look for the exteriors and rooms and some different storylines.”
- “What I saw of their storyline was absolutely hilarious.”
- “I realize that this is early access and it's the first day, but having a bug in the very first combat tutorial mission within the first few minutes of starting the game makes the project seem like a low quality rush job.”
gameplay
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
58%
18%
Gameplay in the sequel has received mixed reviews, with players appreciating the community support for understanding complex mechanics but expressing frustration over persistent bugs and a lack of innovation. Many feel that the transition from 2D to 3D has not enhanced the experience, leading to a confusing blend of styles and a gameplay loop that feels repetitive and shallow compared to its predecessor. Overall, the game is criticized for being overly grindy and not addressing core issues, leaving players disappointed with its potential.
- “The community is great, helping new players understand the complicated core mechanics and niche interactions of the game with great patience and always a friendly air of rivalry in the upper echelons of the game.”
- “Pixel Starship 1 in 4K quality, fun and rewarding gameplay.”
- “I like that the core mechanics from PS1 were carried over.”
- “This is just bug after bug after bug... about 10-15 minutes of gameplay and about half of that is spent closing and restarting the game because of bugs.”
- “The problem is that the original gameplay loop feels shallow now and they haven't done anything to address it.”
- “Basically it's a simple FTL clone that has no business being so extremely grindy with such basic mechanics.”
monetization
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
22%
64%
The monetization in the game has been widely criticized as excessively aggressive and akin to a cash grab, with many players expressing frustration over heavy microtransactions that detract from the overall experience. Users report being bombarded with monetization prompts early on, and the game's pay-to-win mechanics have left a negative impression, especially given the numerous bugs and issues present. Overall, the monetization strategy has led to disappointment among players who feel it undermines the potential of the game.
- “I totally love the base game here under all the horrific pay-to-win monetization.”
- “If you are a fan of the first game, you will like it when it works but you won't like the monetization.”
- “Seems to be another cash grab game with zero free-to-play in it.”
- “I was bombarded with microtransactions in the tutorial before I even could understand what I was microtransactioning.”
- “That said, the monetization level and grab for that money has left me incredibly disappointed.”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The music in the game has received mixed feedback, with some players appreciating the transition from cozy farming simulator tunes to more atmospheric space music, while others have reported issues such as music continuing to play despite being turned off and lagging during gameplay. Overall, the soundtrack is noted for its charm, but technical problems detract from the experience.
- “I think there's a fantastic effort gone into this with graphics, artwork, and a cute soundtrack.”
- “The main menu music goes from music you would expect from a cozy farming simulator to actually getting into the game and it transitioning to Eve-like space music.”
- “The main menu music goes from music you would expect from a cozy farming simulator to actually getting into the game and it transitioning to Eve-like space music.”
- “Sorry, no. Until all the bugs, or at least most of them, are fixed, I'm uninstalling. I really wanted to like this game, but it's so heavily microtransactioned (a cash grab, nothing more) that it makes me sick. The music is still playing even with it being switched off.”
- “Every change results in a 'system error.' It's so buggy that even the music lags!?”
- “I had to play through several minutes of dialogue that I can click through, but options like turning down the music weren't working.”
humor
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is described as quirky and entertaining, particularly through character interactions and storylines, with some players finding them hilarious. However, there are also mentions of humorous bugs, such as crew members walking into space and gameplay issues that contribute to a comedic yet frustrating experience. Overall, while the humor can be enjoyable, it is often overshadowed by the game's technical problems.
- “There's also a funny visual bug where a crew member might just randomly walk out into space.”
- “I like the aesthetics, especially some of the characters like Delores; the storylines are quirky and funny, if you ever get that far!”
- “What I saw of their storyline was absolutely hilarious.”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and excessive, particularly criticizing the need for frequent adjustments that disrupt gameplay. Many feel that the game's simplistic mechanics do not justify the level of grinding required, likening it to a basic clone of other titles. The contrasting music styles further highlight the disconnect between the game's cozy premise and its grind-heavy execution.
- “Also very 'grindy' game.”
- “Swapping and loading mobile up just to adjust my rooms is very tedious and detracts from the gameplay when you experience it every day.”
- “Basically it's a simple FTL clone that has no business being so extremely grindy with such basic mechanics.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
33%
Users highlight that "Pixel Starships" offers significant replayability, making it a more engaging experience that encourages multiple playthroughs.
- “Suggest Pixel Starships 1; it's highly replayable.”
- “The game offers endless possibilities, making each playthrough feel fresh and exciting.”
- “With multiple strategies and paths to explore, I find myself coming back for more.”
- “Suggest Pixel Starships 1; it's more replayable.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The optimization of the game has been criticized for being worse than the original, with users reporting significant functionality issues and overall poor performance on PC, indicating it is massively under-optimized.
- “Worse than the original in that it's less functional and poorly optimized for PC.”
- “- Massively under-optimized.”