Panic Diet!!
- August 12, 2019
- Panic OK!!
Get on Steam
Get on itch.io StorePanic Diet!! is a finite runner with scaling difficulty, character progression and unconventional obstacles.
PC
Windows
Reviews
Audience ScoreBased on 32 reviews
graphics8 positive mentions
- The pixel art is charming and well-executed, adding a cute aesthetic to the game.
- The gameplay is fun and offers a unique experience with constant obstacles and new mechanics.
- At its low price point, the game provides decent entertainment value for a short play session.
- The game suffers from poor balancing and RNG issues, making it frustrating and often unfair.
- Gameplay is very short, with most runs lasting only 10-20 minutes before the novelty wears off.
- Controls can be unresponsive and the hitboxes are inconsistent, leading to many unavoidable losses.
- graphics12 mentions
- 67 % positive mentions
- 25 % neutral mentions
- 8 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game are widely praised for their cute pixel art style and retro aesthetic, with many users noting that the visuals are a standout feature. Despite the game's low cost and some criticism of the gameplay, the overall artwork is considered impressive and visually appealing.
“The pixel art style is very cute; you should give it a try.”
“The only real win with this game is that the retro graphics look good.”
“The graphics are great and the controls are easy to understand.”
“Graphically, it is very pretty, but the gameplay is abysmal.”
- gameplay10 mentions
- 20 % positive mentions
- 60 % neutral mentions
- 20 % negative mentions
The gameplay is described as a compelling auto-runner that remains engaging through the introduction of new mechanics, though some users note issues with programming quality. Overall, it offers a mix of fun and frustration, with a visually appealing character adding to the experience.
“But overall, a compelling auto-runner that never gets boring due to constantly adding new mechanics as you progress.”
“Pretty fun gameplay.”
“Poorly programmed, and bad gameplay.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative
