Skip to main content

Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean

Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean Game Cover
75%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
stability, story
75% User Score Based on 1,580 reviews

Platforms

TabletAndroidPhoneiPadMobile PlatformiPhone
Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean Game Cover

About

Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean is a single player survival simulation game. It was developed by Karate Goose Studio and was released on March 20, 2017. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean" is a game where you must survive in the middle of the ocean by gathering resources, crafting items, and building structures to grow food, make clean water, and fend off a menacing shark. With an advanced crafting system, players can build, fish, and manage their hunger and thirst to ensure their survival. This game is not affiliated with the developers of the original Raft game.

Skip User Reviews

75%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,580 reviews
graphics37 positive mentions
stability6 negative mentions

  • The game runs extremely smoothly and has good mechanics.
  • The concept of living on a floating raft is enjoyable, and resource gathering can be fun.
  • The graphics are decent for a mobile game, and the game has potential for future updates.
  • There is a lack of content, making the game feel repetitive and grindy.
  • Resource management is frustrating, as items require too many resources to craft, leading to constant resource gathering.
  • The controls are clunky and difficult to navigate, making gameplay frustrating at times.
  • graphics
    69 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising their realism and quality, especially for a mobile title, while others criticize them for being glitchy or lacking detail. Some users express a desire for improvements, such as better textures, additional visual effects, and overall enhancements to the graphical fidelity. Despite the criticisms, several players find the graphics enjoyable and suitable for low-end devices, indicating a generally positive reception with room for improvement.

    • “This game is amazing but lacks some features; please add more things like doors, ships, and second-floor materials. However, this game has very amazing and realistic graphics! ”
    • “What an amazing game and graphics! ❤️ I love the game so much.”
    • “The controls feel smooth, the graphics are great, and the feel of the game overall is just amazing!”
    • “Aside from plenty of volume and graphics controls, which many games lack, this simulator is very glitchy, and it has an odd sense of physics.”
    • “Lags too much, terrible graphics and quality.”
    • “The graphics need to be better and I am going to use this a lot for my YouTube channel.”
  • gameplay
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally praised for its smooth mechanics and enjoyable movement, with crafting and building elements working well. However, players note a lack of content and variety, expressing a desire for more items, challenges, and updates to enhance the experience. While the graphics are appreciated, some users feel that the gameplay can become repetitive and that health management needs improvement.

    • “The mechanics are really good, and the game runs extremely smoothly.”
    • “I like the movement mechanics.”
    • “Crafting and building mechanics work great!”
    • “I agree with other reviewers that this game badly needs a guide to the game mechanics.”
    • “I absolutely love the gameplay, but you run out of health too fast. I don't like that about this game; it needs an upgrade.”
    • “It's okay, but you should improve the gameplay and quality because it makes it boring.”
  • stability
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The stability of the game has received mixed feedback, with many users reporting frequent glitches that disrupt gameplay, particularly during significant progress or interactions with in-game elements like the shark. While some players express a strong affection for the game overall, they acknowledge that these technical issues can detract from the experience.

    • “It's a pretty good game, but it glitches whenever I make significant progress.”
    • “Take out the shark or at least make it so it doesn't glitch on your boat. Also, take out the run feature; it glitches you into the water, and that's when the shark glitches onto your boat. Additionally, make it so you don't lose hunger and thirst so quickly and have more seaweed.”
    • “I love it; it just glitches on my phone.”
  • humor
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users find the humor in the game to be a mixed bag; while some appreciate the amusing glitches, such as a shark hilariously flying away, others feel that the overall comedic potential is underutilized. The graphics are praised, but there is a desire for more intentional humor throughout the gameplay.

    • “Cool graphics, but the shark is funny glitching in my boat.”
    • “I love it, and thank you for that funny glitch when the shark needed to be broken.”
    • “My raft is flying away; it's funny! ”
    • “The only things you're given are to pick up items here and there, and even then the 'supplies' are so hard to get with the hook they provide that it's not funny.”
  • story
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players enjoy the game's fun and engaging mechanics but express a desire for a more developed story and additional content, as many feel they quickly exhaust available missions and building options. The lack of depth in the narrative leaves some users wanting more challenges and features to enhance their experience.

    • “I love this game, but it's a very fast game to play. I already have a three-story raft and I've been playing for 2 days, but I like this game a lot! ”
    • “This game is so fun to play, but a little easy. I built a three-story home.”
    • “Been playing two days and got everything and a huge three-story building. I did every possible thing I can do. Update please: need beds, shark fights, underwater exploring, and need a bow and arrow and throwing spear. Need more things to build as well.”
    • “I've been playing this game for over a week yet the missions are finished and I don't know what to do.”
    • “Been playing two days and got everything and a huge 3 story building. I did every possible thing I can do. Update please, need beds, shark fights, underwater exploring, and need a bow and arrow and throwing spear. Need more things to build as well.”
    • “This game is so fun to play but a little easy; I built a three story home.”
  • grinding
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the game excessively grindy, but many are still captivated by its creative building and farming mechanics, leading to hours of enjoyable gameplay.

    • “Way too grindy of a game.”
    • “I got hooked on it now and love the creative aspects of building and farming.”
    • “It's a really fun game, especially the farming element, but the grinding can be excessive.”
  • monetization
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users express frustration with the monetization strategy, particularly due to excessive ads that disrupt gameplay, especially when reconnecting to Wi-Fi. This has led some players to delete the game, indicating a negative impact on their overall experience.

    • “It's frustrating that every time I turn my phone back on and connect to Wi-Fi, I'm bombarded with ads. I can't play anymore, so I ended up deleting the game. Don't download this if you want to avoid being hacked.”
    • “There is one major issue: the ads are overwhelming, and I really dislike them.”
  • replayability
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users express a desire for games with simple concepts and intuitive controls that enhance replayability. However, some reviewers struggled with the controls to the extent that they couldn't fully assess the game's replay value.

    • “I am looking for something with a simple concept and intuitive controls with decent replayability.”
    • “I couldn't tolerate the controls long enough to see if it was replayable.”
    • “The game lacks the depth needed for meaningful replayability.”
    • “Once you've completed the main objectives, there's little incentive to play again.”
  • emotional
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional response to the game is largely negative, with players expressing frustration over gameplay mechanics that lead to frequent failures, detracting from any potential emotional engagement.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean

8h Median play time
8h Average play time
8-8h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Games Like Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean

Games Like Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean

Survival Island: EVO 2 ImageSurvival Island: EVO 2 ImageSurvival Island: EVO 2 Image
Raft® Survival - Ocean Nomad ImageRaft® Survival - Ocean Nomad ImageRaft® Survival - Ocean Nomad Image
Survival Island: Survivor EVO ImageSurvival Island: Survivor EVO ImageSurvival Island: Survivor EVO Image
Sunkenland: Ocean Survival ImageSunkenland: Ocean Survival ImageSunkenland: Ocean Survival Image
Last Pirate: Survival Island ImageLast Pirate: Survival Island ImageLast Pirate: Survival Island Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean is a survival simulation game.

Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean is available on Phone, iPad, iPhone, Tablet and others.

On average players spend around 8 hours playing Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean.

Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean was released on March 20, 2017.

Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean was developed by Karate Goose Studio.

Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its stability.

Oceanborn: Survival in Ocean is a single player game.

Similar games include Survival Island: EVO 2, Raft® Survival - Ocean Nomad, Survival Island: Survivor EVO, Sunkenland: Ocean Survival, Last Pirate: Survival Island and others.