Nuclear Power Station Creator

About

In "Nuclear Power Station Creator" , manage Japan's national network of nuclear power plants during the second half of the 20th century. Strive to meet increasing electricity demands while maintaining safety, introducing new technologies, and keeping public trust. Build and upgrade power plants in 8 regions to support growing cities and maintain profitability until the 21st century.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Nuclear Power Station Creator screenshot

12%

Audience ScoreBased on 43 reviews

stability3 negative mentions

The game has a good idea behind it and shows potential for a unique strategy/management experience.
Some players appreciate the graphics and UI design, noting that it looks nice at first glance.
There have been some updates that have improved gameplay and added features like saving, indicating that the developers are making efforts to enhance the game.

The game is broken, unfinished, and feels like a cash grab, with many players expressing regret over their purchase.
Gameplay is extremely slow-paced, requiring long waiting times with minimal interaction, leading to a lack of engagement.
The game has numerous bugs, lacks clear goals, and has been abandoned by the developers, leaving it in a state that is far from playable.

stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with frequent bugs and freezing, particularly when reaching the third territory, rendering it nearly unplayable. Overall, players find it to be more broken than functional.
- “It's buggy and not really a contentful game.”
- “When you get to the third available territory, the game just freezes and will not allow you to do anything.”
- “It is buggy at best, but more likely broken.”
gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Gameplay experiences vary significantly among users; some express frustration over a lack of content and updates, while others praise a recent rework that has made the mechanics more enjoyable. Overall, opinions are polarized, with some recommending against the game and others finding it improved.
- “The gameplay got a real rework and is now more enjoyable than before.”
- “There is no gameplay, no content, no updates, no fun. Don't buy it!”
- “While that is all fine and dandy, it doesn’t make the game mechanics work.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The monetization of the game is criticized as exploitative, with users labeling it a cash grab due to the developer's abandonment and the game's unfinished state.
- “The developer is no longer working on this game, and it feels unfinished; it is basically a cash grab.”
- “The monetization strategy is overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending money.”
- “I feel like the game is designed to push players towards microtransactions rather than providing a complete experience.”
graphics
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Users express confusion about the inclusion of a graphics setting, questioning its necessity and functionality within the game. This suggests that the graphics options may not significantly enhance the visual experience or that players are unsure of their impact.
- “Why is there a graphics setting?”
- “The graphics look outdated and lack detail.”
- “The visual effects are underwhelming and don't match modern standards.”