Nogibator: Way Of Legs

About

Le Grande Story: The border of the universe is some serious stuff, they protect it much more seriously than the tavern in Krivodanovka. It's no secret that the border of the universe is protected more seriously than anything inside it! After all, the parallel worlds begin, the mischief goes all the way. So, you will protect this border, or so you thought. Aha, not a chance! You will play the LEGS …

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

56%

Audience ScoreBased on 34 reviews

story1 positive mentions

music3 negative mentions

The game features a unique and original concept of controlling a pair of legs with various upgrades.
Some players found the game to be fun and entertaining for short bursts, especially for achievement hunters.
It is relatively inexpensive and does not include microtransactions or forced multiplayer elements.

The game suffers from poor graphics, clunky controls, and a lack of customization options, making it feel amateurish.
Gameplay is repetitive and slow-paced, leading to boredom after a short period of play.
The user interface is unintuitive, and the audio controls are inadequate, contributing to a frustrating experience.

music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
43%
43%
The game's music has received mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the background track, many criticize it for being repetitive and limited to a single looping song. Additionally, the lack of audio controls frustrates users, forcing them to use external methods to adjust the sound. Overall, the soundtrack detracts from the experience for a significant portion of the player base.
- “I liked the background music.”
- “Bewilderingly, the game doesn't include proper audio controls, so you can't turn off the annoying background music; you'll need to alt+tab out and stop the music using the Windows sound mixer.”
- “The game is ugly and the soundtrack is one song that is looped.”
- “There are no settings to speak of, gameplay is clunky, and the single musical track is repetitive.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The graphics in the game have been widely criticized for their poor quality, described as a mix of outdated pixel art and amateurish MS Paint-style drawings. Reviewers noted a lack of resolution options and customization settings, contributing to an overall unsatisfactory visual experience.
- “The artwork here is terrible; it's a blend of old retro pixel art used as a substitute for contemporary PC graphics, and some of the most amateurish MS Paint style drawings I've ever seen.”
- “It's unclear if this is due to a lack of budget to hire someone who can do graphics properly, or a lack of talent. Regardless, the overall visual quality of the game is extremely low as a result of these decisions.”
- “There's no options to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Gamemaker Studio is often associated with low-quality, retro-style games that some consider cash grabs, but it notably lacks microtransactions, which may appeal to players seeking a straightforward gaming experience.
- “+ No microtransactions”
- “Gamemaker Studio is most commonly used to make retro pixel shovelware and cash grabs.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay is criticized for being clunky and lacking customization options, leading to a repetitive experience due to a limited musical track and monotonous gameplay loop.
- “There are no settings to speak of, gameplay is clunky, and the single musical track is repetitive.”
- “Repetitive gameplay loop.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story is emotionally impactful, evoking strong feelings in players almost immediately, while also being complemented by stunning visuals in high resolution and frame rates.
- “The story alone had me crying after only a few minutes, while my eyes were awed at the sight of 8K, 900 FPS art.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game's concept is promising; however, players report significant performance issues that hinder the overall experience.
- “The idea for the game may be good, but the performance is poor.”
- “The game suffers from severe optimization issues, making it nearly unplayable on lower-end systems.”
- “Despite its potential, the game is plagued by lag and frame drops that ruin the experience.”