Nanofights

About

Nanofights is a single player and multiplayer action game. It was developed by Quantumfrog and was released on December 11, 2014. It received neutral reviews from players.

Nanofights is an “Online Trading Card Game”, made for fast gameplay. Build your individual deck out of four completely different factions and over 300 cards and fight against the computer or other players. Every faction has many different creatures, buildings, towers and support cards and allows any deck to have its own strategies and strengths.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

50%

Audience ScoreBased on 152 reviews

gameplay5 positive mentions

graphics6 negative mentions

The game features interesting card mechanics and a unique sci-fi universe that blends traits from various classic card games.
Some of the card artwork is good, with a few pieces being very well done, showcasing the effort put into the game's design.
The battle aspect and tactical placement of cards can be enjoyable for players who appreciate card games.

The user interface is cluttered and confusing, making it difficult to navigate and understand the game mechanics.
There is a lack of online players, resulting in repetitive gameplay against AI opponents, which diminishes the multiplayer experience.
The tutorial is poorly designed and does not adequately explain the game, leaving new players feeling lost and frustrated.

graphics
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
18%
55%
The graphics of the game are widely criticized as outdated and poor, with many reviewers noting that they resemble designs from the early 2000s. While the card artwork is praised for its quality and sharpness, the overall user interface is described as unintuitive and lacking in visual appeal. Despite some appreciation for the thematic and conceptual artwork, the general consensus is that the graphics detract significantly from the gaming experience.
- “I really like the theme and conceptual artwork of this game; the cards are really sharp looking.”
- “Artwork is awesome, huge strong point.”
- “Most of the card artwork is good.”
- “Graphic is poor and the UI is non-intuitive.”
- “Not very good looking graphically and the UI is quite awful.”
- “The graphics look like they came out of 2003.”
gameplay
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
45%
28%
27%
The gameplay has received largely negative feedback, with users citing a clunky interface, poor tutorial, and outdated mechanics that fail to innovate compared to better card games. While some interesting card mechanics exist, the overall experience is marred by confusion and a lack of engaging content, leading many to deem it not worth the investment, even at a low price.
- “Nice gameplay.”
- “It has interesting card mechanics.”
- “The actual underlying cards and mechanics seem solid.”
- “The gameplay is awful.”
- “Clunky, confusing interface and doesn't add a lot of gameplay compared to other card games.”
- “Tutorial was quite basic and did not explain the mechanics.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The music in the game has been criticized for being lacking, with users noting the absence of background music and describing the overall audio experience as dull. This has contributed to a less engaging atmosphere, impacting the game's replayability and enjoyment.
- “Extremely dull interface, choppy animations, no background music.”
- “The music is repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “There is no background music, which makes the experience feel empty and uninspired.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game lacks a meaningful story or progression, leading to repetitive gameplay where players face the same battles against computer decks. While the AI performance is decent, the absence of a narrative or engaging content diminishes the overall experience.
- “The AI doesn't seem bad at playing, but there is no story (not that I'd expect Shandalar in today's online TCGs, but usually there is some sense of progression), and you'll feel like you're doing the same battle over and over again.”
- “No story or anything besides replaying the same computer deck against your single starter deck.”
- “Even though there are other small flaws such as a confusing tutorial mission, the lack of a compelling story is a major drawback.”