Muck

About

Muck is a multiplayer survival action adventure game. It was developed by DEVENILLA and was released on June 5, 2021. It received very positive reviews from players.

"Muck" is a game containing a challenging end-game boss, a mix of ME, Benten, and Dragon ballyea, considered as hard as Bob. To summon this boss, you need two guardian gems to unlock its shrine. Defeating it requires striking it again within 5 seconds of the initial hit, triggering its special attack for increased damage output.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

94%

Audience ScoreBased on 101,306 reviews

humor1.8k positive mentions

grinding157 negative mentions

The humor in 'Muck' is chaotic and absurd, leading to hilarious moments, especially in multiplayer.
The gameplay loop combines survival mechanics with roguelike elements, providing an engaging and fun experience.
The game is completely free-to-play with no microtransactions, making it a refreshing alternative in the gaming market.

The game suffers from a lack of depth and repetitive mechanics, leading to a feeling of grindiness and frustration.
Graphics are often criticized as simplistic and amateurish, which may not appeal to players seeking high-quality visuals.
Frequent bugs and glitches disrupt gameplay, causing frustration and hindering the overall experience.

humor
1,784 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
99%
1%
The humor in "Muck" is widely praised for its chaotic and absurd nature, often leading to hilarious moments, especially when played with friends. Players enjoy the game's silly mechanics, quirky character designs, and humorous item descriptions, which contribute to a light-hearted experience despite its challenging gameplay. Overall, the game is seen as a fun, meme-filled adventure that thrives on its comedic elements, making it a hit among those who appreciate a blend of humor and survival mechanics.
- “This game is bloody hilarious, and really fun too!”
- “It's a funny game to play with friends just the end part of it is really really hard.”
- “The unpredictable nature of the game makes for some truly hilarious and unforgettable moments.”
- “Minecraft if it was made by unfunny millennials.”
- “Filled with unfunny humor for 10-year-olds who overuse the word 'irony'.”
- “Boring gameplay and unfunny dialogue that would only entertain swollen brain stem idiots who look at wholesome Minecraft memes and dank Konosuba funny moments.”
gameplay
1,399 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
57%
5%
The gameplay of "Muck" is characterized by a fun and engaging loop that combines survival mechanics with roguelike elements, allowing players to gather resources, craft items, and face increasingly difficult enemies. While many players appreciate the chaotic and humorous nature of the game, some criticize its lack of depth, repetitive mechanics, and absence of a save feature, which can lead to frustration. Overall, the game is seen as a solid free-to-play experience, particularly enjoyable in multiplayer settings, but it could benefit from additional content and refinement of its mechanics.
- “The core gameplay loop is simple: collect resources during the day, craft better gear, and prepare to survive increasingly difficult enemies that attack at night.”
- “The mechanics are easy to learn, but the game still offers a good level of challenge, especially as enemy difficulty ramps up quickly.”
- “Muck is a chaotic survival game with a cool art style, solid combat, and surprisingly fun co-op gameplay—especially with friends.”
- “Lacks content after 50 hours of gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is shallow, the mechanics are unrefined, and the overall experience feels more like a tech demo than a completed game.”
- “The entire gameplay loop feels uninspired and lackluster.”
graphics
988 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
37%
56%
7%
The graphics of "Muck" have received mixed reviews, with many players noting their simplistic and low-poly style reminiscent of early indie games. While some find the visuals charming and fitting for the game's quirky nature, others criticize them as amateurish and lacking detail. Overall, the graphics are generally considered adequate for the gameplay experience, especially given the game's free-to-play model, but they may not appeal to those seeking high-end visuals.
- “The graphics are stunning and the game is super interactive!”
- “Muck's visuals may be simple, but they possess a charming and cohesive art style that perfectly complements the gameplay.”
- “The graphics, while minimalist, are charming and perfectly suited to the game's tone.”
- “The graphics are outdated, and the gameplay feels repetitive.”
- “The graphics are overly simplistic, bordering on amateurish, and the user interface feels hastily put together.”
- “The graphics are dog water.”
story
532 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
70%
12%
The reviews overwhelmingly indicate that the game lacks a substantial story, with many players noting that it primarily focuses on gameplay rather than narrative. While some users express a desire for a more developed storyline or quest system, others find enjoyment in the game's mechanics and multiplayer aspects, suggesting that the absence of a traditional story does not detract from the overall fun. A few reviews mention emotional or humorous elements, but these are often seen as secondary to the gameplay experience.
- “This is seriously the most beautiful, well put together story ever.”
- “The sheer magnitude of delight and fulfillment emanating from this extraordinary game exemplifies the transformative power of immersive storytelling and gameplay, cementing its status as an unforgettable experience that leaves an indelible mark on all who embark on this extraordinary journey of virtual enlightenment.”
- “Muck's story not only critiques capitalism and the will for survival in a pre-industrial age society but it also challenges colonialism as you as a player are dropped into an unfamiliar world and you are challenged with moral decisions on whether you should improve the lives of these peoples or conquer them for profit.”
- “☑ no story (there is no story for a player who has no knowledge of what Dani made up on this game. The game just spawns you on a random location of an island.)”
- “Characterized by a poorly constructed, incoherent, and often nonsensical storyline, the narrative lacks the depth, originality, and coherence needed to engage players on an emotional level.”
- “This weak narrative framework severely undermines player immersion and engagement, as the storyline does not offer any meaningful context or motivation for the player’s actions within the game world.”
grinding
249 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
36%
63%
The grinding aspect of the game is a significant focus, with many players noting that it can be excessively time-consuming and tedious, especially due to the lack of a save function. While some enjoy the challenge and find the resource gathering rewarding, others feel it becomes repetitive and frustrating, particularly in multiplayer settings where coordination is key. Overall, players suggest that a substantial commitment is required to progress, often humorously stating that "you'll need a second life for grinding."
- “Although it's not grindy, it still takes time to progress, and since there is no saving, you can't just play the game over multiple days like with pretty much every other survival game.”
- “Progression in the game is very simple: take rock, chop wood, get better rock, chop better wood, get even better rock, chop even better wood, and so on. It works as it actually feels nice to progress and isn't too tedious for what it is. In the end, when you actually have nice stuff, you progress by defeating guardians instead, which mixes up the endgame!”
- “It's not too grindy; the difficulty feels nice as you progress, and the game already has a baseline for a solid crafting/building system.”
- “Progression can sometimes feel grindy, especially after repeated early deaths, and the endgame boss rush gets repetitive unless you find a group with solid synergy.”
- “It sucks that when you spend a couple of hours playing the game, get a bit burnt out and want to play another game, but can't save, making all of those hours of grinding worthless.”
- “The amount of time it takes to mine resource nodes is a tad tedious.”
replayability
188 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
52%
5%
The game's replayability is a mixed bag, with many players praising its procedural generation and multiplayer aspects that keep each session feeling fresh and engaging. However, some users note that once the game is mastered, it can lose its appeal, particularly in solo play, leading to a perception of limited replay value. Overall, while the game offers high replayability for multiplayer experiences and varied gameplay, it may fall short for those seeking depth and long-term engagement in single-player modes.
- “High replayability: procedural maps + randomized drops mean every run feels fresh.”
- “Muck offers a substantial amount of content, with a focus on replayability and procedural generation.”
- “The procedural generation of the world ensures that no two playthroughs are ever the same, giving the game incredible replayability.”
- “My only complaint is once you learn each part of the game, it loses most of its replay value.”
- “Moreover, the game's replayability is severely limited due to a lack of meaningful content and progression systems.”
- “Honestly such a fun game to play, but I have finished it and it has little replayability after beating it.”
music
179 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
28%
70%
2%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising its emotional depth and ability to enhance the gameplay experience, while others criticize it for being repetitive or lacking in variety. Many highlight specific tracks that evoke strong feelings, but there are also complaints about low-quality sound effects and a sparse soundtrack that fails to maintain engagement. Overall, the music can be a highlight for some, but it may not resonate with all players, leading to a somewhat polarized reception.
- “Memorable audio: from serene opening notes to intense survival beats, the soundtrack is an emotional rollercoaster.”
- “The soundtrack, with its energetic and sometimes comically intense beats, complements the game’s unpredictable nature, heightening the sense of urgency as the sun sets and monstrosities emerge.”
- “The music and sound design are excellent, with a soundtrack that fits the adventurous spirit of the game.”
- “The audio fares no better — repetitive, low-quality sound effects and a forgettable soundtrack leave the experience feeling hollow.”
- “The soundtrack is uninspired, repetitive, and often fails to match the tone or mood of the gameplay.”
- “Background music, which should enhance the atmosphere, becomes monotonous and grating over time, adding to the overall sense of boredom and disengagement.”
stability
119 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
1%
94%
The game's stability has received mixed feedback, with many players noting frequent bugs and glitches that can disrupt gameplay, such as enemies spawning inappropriately and crashes. While some find these issues amusing and part of the game's charm, others express frustration over how they hinder the overall experience. Overall, the game is seen as having potential, but it requires significant improvements in stability to enhance playability.
- “There's no glitches I know of, mostly because when you encounter a glitch, chances are it's just game design.”
- “Runs great on low-end PCs as well!”
- “Right now it's basically a bug-free game and is very fun; as far as I have played, there isn't a ton to the game but I would 100% recommend.”
- “Frequent glitches, bugs, and crashes disrupt the gameplay experience, causing frustration and hindering progress.”
- “The game is also a horrendously buggy mess.”
- “This game is shit, it is very hard, very buggy and straight up bad.”
emotional
114 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is overwhelmingly impactful, with many players reporting intense feelings ranging from joy to heartbreak. Numerous reviews highlight moments that elicited tears, whether through touching narratives, memorable soundtracks, or profound character experiences. While some players found the emotional weight to be a source of pain and frustration, others celebrated it as a transformative and deeply engaging experience, making the game memorable and significant.
- “Memorable audio: from serene opening notes to intense survival beats, the soundtrack is an emotional rollercoaster.”
- “A deep and emotional story, made me cry. GG, get it.”
- “This game touched me on an emotional level like no other.”
optimization
94 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
51%
16%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its performance on various systems and others highlighting significant issues such as lag, high resource usage, and poor performance on lower-end hardware. While a few users noted that the game runs well and is enjoyable, many expressed frustration over frequent bugs and the need for better optimization, particularly for those with less powerful PCs. Overall, the game's optimization appears to be a major point of contention among players, with calls for improvements to enhance the gaming experience.
- “The game is surprisingly well optimized.”
- “Much more optimized than some other games.”
- “Overall, this game is silly and goofy, while also being a pretty optimized game, with fun and well-designed mechanics.”
- “Awful and messy game with poor lag optimization.”
- “The game is great, but the optimization is poor, especially dealing with enemy spawns, as there is no way to change how fast the corpses despawn.”
- “Extremely poorly optimized; other than that, it's a good game but could be way better optimized.”
atmosphere
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
41%
9%
The atmosphere in the game is often described as immersive and captivating, with a blend of dark, intricate designs and whimsical elements that enhance the overall experience. Players appreciate the combination of sound design, visuals, and environmental storytelling, which create a range of moods from relaxing to exhilarating. However, some critiques mention that certain aspects, like repetitive music or lackluster graphics, can detract from the intended atmosphere.
- “The world of Dark Souls 2 is vast and interconnected, filled with intricate design, hidden secrets, and an atmosphere that pulls you into its dark and dangerous world.”
- “The soundtrack, composed of catchy tunes and atmospheric tracks, complements the gameplay perfectly, enhancing the overall experience.”
- “The sound design adds another layer of immersion, with atmospheric effects and bone-chilling creature noises that sent shivers down my spine.”
- “Background music, which should enhance the atmosphere, becomes monotonous and grating over time, adding to the overall sense of boredom and disengagement.”
- “Atmosphere: this game was made in a few days, so it's (bad).”
- “❎ fair: basic sound/music, doesn't enhance the atmosphere.”
monetization
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
43%
41%
The monetization aspect of the game is largely praised for its absence of microtransactions and ads, with many users appreciating that it is completely free to play. However, some reviews express concerns about exploitative monetization strategies in other games, highlighting issues like pay-to-win elements that can detract from the overall experience. Overall, the game is seen as a refreshing alternative in a market often plagued by aggressive monetization tactics.
- “Muck is a free-to-play game with no microtransactions, which is always a plus in my book.”
- “It's completely free, and fortunately, there is no pay-to-win aspect nor microtransactions of any sort.”
- “No microtransactions, no loot boxes, just pure 100% fun.”
- “Furthermore, the game's economic model, including in-game purchases and monetization strategies, often feels exploitative and detracts from the enjoyment of the game.”
- “Microtransactions, pay-to-win elements, and other monetization tactics can create an uneven playing field and undermine the sense of achievement and progression.”
- “I went into Rogue Company expecting something better and was disappointed and then bombarded with advertising to spend money.”
character development
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
20%
20%
Character development in the game receives mixed reviews, with some praising the quirky and endearing character design as a highlight, while others find the models lack detail and personality. Despite these criticisms, many players appreciate the depth of character development and the overall gameplay experience, indicating that the characters contribute positively to the game's unconventional journey. Overall, while opinions on character design vary, the depth of character development is often recognized as a strong point.
- “The character design is phenomenal.”
- “Excellent game, super complex mechanics and a character development that cannot be better.”
- “Character design is equally lackluster, with models that lack detail and personality.”
- “Truly a masterpiece of a game, the storytelling and graphics are finely crafted, the combat is deep and compelling, and the character development of Muck Man is just beautiful, 11/10.”