MadGuns

About

MadGuns is a multiplayer action game. It was developed by Novalink and was released on July 3, 2020. It received neutral reviews from players.

Multiplayer free-to-play first-person shooter. Crazy weapons, battle strategy, dynamic gameplay. Win the battle for territory with your team.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

53%

Audience ScoreBased on 87 reviews

gameplay4 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

MadGuns offers fast-paced, arcade-style gameplay that emphasizes reflexes and quick decision-making, making it engaging and fun.
The game features a variety of weapons and maps, along with character customization options that enhance replayability.
Despite its simplistic graphics, the unique visual style and unconventional game modes provide a fresh take on the shooter genre.

The game suffers from a lack of players, resulting in a dead online community and limited matchmaking options.
There are significant pay-to-win mechanics, as many weapons and features require real money to unlock, which detracts from the overall experience.
Technical issues such as poor hit detection, bugs, and a lack of meaningful single-player content contribute to a frustrating gameplay experience.

gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
30%
30%
The gameplay of this title is highly polarizing, with some praising its graphics and mechanics as top-tier, while others criticize it for pay-to-win elements, poor netcode, and issues with hit detection. Players appreciate the fun and quick nature of the online FPS experience, but many express frustration over the game's monetization strategies and technical shortcomings. Overall, the gameplay experience is marred by significant flaws that detract from its potential.
- “I highly recommend it to everyone, the graphics are immaculate, gameplay and physics are top tier and the community is amazing.”
- “This game is truly amazing, the gameplay is astounding and gives me shivers because of how good it is.”
- “[*] An online free-to-play FPS game with quite a few weapons, maps that fit this style of game, and quick, fun gameplay.”
- “There's so much wrong with this it's hard to keep track. Pay-to-win mechanics, stolen assets, a history of asset flipping from a known scammer... just avoid this completely.”
- “After an additional 6 hours of gameplay, the game still sucks even though it's out of beta. Hit detection still needs to be fixed and guns still suck. But I don't see as many cheaters as I used to, so props on that.”
- “Netcode needs a lot of work, player movement needs refinement, the maps are far too spread thin, and there is a very obvious pay-to-win mechanic that is literally impossible to circumvent.”
graphics
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
43%
43%
The graphics in the game are consistently praised for their realism and high quality, with many users highlighting the impressive textures and modern design. Overall, the visual presentation is considered top-tier, enhancing the gameplay experience significantly.
- “I highly recommend it to everyone, the graphics are immaculate, gameplay and physics are top tier and the community is amazing.”
- “The graphics will blow your socks off.”
- “Fast game with modern day graphics with easy controls that moves from location A to B to C and so on.”
- “[h1]graphics & textures.”
monetization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
80%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized for lacking transparency and ethical practices, with accusations of plagiarism and being a cash grab. Users suggest that the developers should focus on better marketing and communication rather than relying on questionable monetization tactics.
- “The developers here didn't credit any of the artists and real, actual game developers who created the assets, so this is plagiarism as well as a cash grab.”
- “A clear failure at a cash grab.”
- “More interaction and communication would be nice, including some more advertising and promoting.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is described as very funny, with references to popular memes like "amogus" and "red is sus," appealing to a younger audience. Reviewers recommend it for its comedic elements, suggesting it is suitable for ages as young as three. Overall, the humor is a standout feature that enhances the gaming experience.
- “Funny”
- “Very funny! Is red sus???”
- “Overall, it is funny! Hahaha, good game recommended for ages 3 and up.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's story is largely absent, with some players feeling that the developer relied too heavily on multiplayer interactions to compensate for a lack of traditional storytelling and level design elements.
- “The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design, etc. to the game.”
- “No story.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players indicate that grinding in the game can be quite demanding, often requiring significant time investment or additional lives to progress effectively.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
- “I spent hours grinding, and it still feels like I'm nowhere.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is marred by various bugs and glitches, including sound issues, which detract from the overall experience. Additionally, players have noted a pay-to-win (P2W) element, as unlocking weapons requires real money, further complicating the stability of gameplay.
- “Bugs, glitches, and a slight pay-to-win vibe; every weapon needs to be unlocked with real money.”
- “Sound bugs and various glitches in general.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music and sound effects in the game are generally considered satisfactory, with users finding them acceptable but not particularly outstanding.