Loop

About

Loop is a single player casual puzzle game. It was developed by Aidan Strong and was released on November 24, 2020. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"Loop" is a comedic first-person game where players complete laps around a test track, inspired by "The Stanley Parable" and "Portal." The full release offers new content, bug fixes, and quality of life updates, based on the award-winning Ludum Dare 47 submission. Players will experience a humorous and confusing journey as they repeat the looped track.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 114 reviews

humor20 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

The game offers a humorous and entertaining experience, especially in the beginning, with engaging narration and absurd scenarios.
It's a free game that provides a simple yet enjoyable gameplay loop, making it accessible for casual players.
The minimalist design and intuitive controls create a relaxing atmosphere, making it suitable for short gaming sessions.

The gameplay becomes repetitive and lacks content after the initial 15 minutes, leading to boredom for many players.
The graphics are low quality and dated, which may deter players looking for a more visually appealing experience.
The game relies heavily on a timer mechanic that can feel tedious, with little payoff for completing the loops.

humor
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized by absurd scenarios and a mildly satirical, surrealist tone, often eliciting genuine laughter from players. While many found the narrator's comedic delivery entertaining, some reviews suggest that the humor can be inconsistent and may not always reflect the game's overall quality. Despite mixed opinions, the game has been recognized for its comedic elements, with players appreciating its lightheartedness and fun, albeit with some noting it can be time-consuming to fully experience.
- “As you progress in your laps, you're presented with humor that relies on absurd scenarios and situations, with a mildly satirical, surrealist bent applied.”
- “A first-person walking simulator with hilarious narrated situations that often leave you confused.”
- “Even though it took me less than 30 minutes to finish, I found it hilarious and great.”
gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
The gameplay of [i]Loop[/i] is centered around its unique looping mechanic, providing a smooth experience, though some players find it limited in content after the initial 15 minutes. While the game is available for free, its short duration and lack of depth may not appeal to everyone, especially those seeking a more substantial experience. Overall, it offers a fun, albeit brief, gameplay loop that can be enjoyable for casual play.
- “The core mechanic of Loop revolves around, well, loops!”
- “The controls make every round of gameplay a smooth experience.”
- “I liked it, but if you plan on getting all four Steam achievements in one gameplay session like I did, you'd better plan to have plenty of free time.”
- “Loop is bound to a 60-minute timer and it has nothing to offer (comedically or in terms of gameplay) after the 15-minute mark.”
- “Gameplay is exactly what you see in the trailer.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The graphics of the game are characterized by low-quality, low-poly 3D visuals, which many players find unappealing and a significant drawback. While some gamers appreciate the gameplay, the overall visual presentation falls short compared to contemporary AAA titles, leading to mixed feelings about the game's aesthetic appeal.
- “Gaming is a visual medium, and while some developers struggle with creating high-quality visuals, failing to do so is a disservice to gamers.”
- “People like the popular titles these days such as Cyberpunk 2077, GTA 5, and other AAA titles, and believe me, I'm with them. But you gotta try this game out; the graphics may not be the best, but the gameplay is so good that I love this game, so give it a try.”
- “In terms of visuals, this features fairly low quality low poly 3D graphics which will deter a lot of gamers, understandably.”
- “Gaming is a visual medium, and while some developers struggle with creating high quality visuals, failing to do so is a disservice to gamers.”
- “The graphics are quite simple and lack the detail that many players have come to expect from modern games.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
33%
50%
The game's story is described as unique and engaging, providing a captivating adventure that keeps players hooked throughout. However, some reviews express skepticism about the narrative's depth, with sarcastic remarks suggesting it may not be particularly meaningful or useful for evaluating the game's overall worth.
- “Its unique story creates a great adventure all around that will keep you hooked from the first round to the last.”
- “The comedians give us the usual 'this game cured my cancer, saved my marriage, changed my life' story... sarcastic, but not useful if you want to know if the game is worth it.”
- “1/16 story”
- “✅ bad story”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The music in the game is criticized for its repetitiveness, with players noting that it quickly becomes monotonous and fades into the background. While some find the music acceptable, the lack of variety leads to a less engaging experience.
- “The game looks all right and the music is all right too.”
- “The music repeats.”
- “For half an hour, you run in silence, accompanied only by the music you've already tuned out 20 minutes ago.”
- “One song on repeat.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the emotional aspect of the game to be heartwarming and uplifting, contributing to a wholesome overall experience.
- “The game evokes a deep sense of nostalgia and warmth.”
- “I felt a profound connection to the characters and their struggles.”
- “The story touched my heart and left me in tears.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be repetitive and tedious, leading to boredom after a short period. Many describe it as a monotonous experience that detracts from overall enjoyment.
- “Repetitive, grindy, and boring after a short amount of time.”
- “It's basically a pretty tedious mini Stanley Parable.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally find the game's replayability to be limited, with many citing that the experience feels repetitive after a few playthroughs. However, some appreciate the different choices and outcomes available, which can encourage multiple runs for those seeking to explore all possibilities. Overall, while not highly replayable for everyone, it offers enough variation to attract dedicated players.
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The Mac version of the game suffers from stability issues, including disappearing subtitles and menu text, as well as an inability to exit to the main menu, leading to a frustrating user experience.
- “Unfortunately, it's a bit buggy in the Mac version - subtitles and text on the menus disappear after a while, and you actually can't exit out of the game to the main menu.”