Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator

About

Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator is a single player and multiplayer simulation game. It was developed by Mindflair Games LTD and was released on November 18, 2025. It received neutral reviews from players.

PLAY THE NEW DEMO AND THEN CONTINUE YOUR JOURNEY WHEN YOU PICK UP THE GAME Try before you buy! This new demo features all the gameplay improvements from the latest game update. Plus, once you buy the game, you can continue your journey seamlessly - your save data from the demo transfers across to the game itself. Roadmap About the GamePlay alone or with up to 4 players in 4 RVs. Drive,…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator screenshot

Skip User Reviews

48%

Audience ScoreBased on 86 reviews

humor2 positive mentions

optimization3 negative mentions

The game offers a fun and relaxing experience, especially when played with friends, making it a good choice for casual gaming.
The recent updates have introduced features like adjustable storm speed, enhancing gameplay variety and allowing for a more laid-back experience.
The game has a strong foundation with potential for growth, and many players appreciate its unique atmosphere and mechanics.

The game currently feels incomplete and lacks content, with repetitive environments and limited resources leading to a sense of boredom.
Numerous bugs and performance issues detract from the experience, including glitches with items and problems with saving progress.
Many players feel the price is unjustified for the current state of the game, suggesting it should be significantly lower until more content and polish are added.

gameplay
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
66%
17%
The gameplay is characterized by a blend of driving mechanics, survival elements, and scavenging in a post-disaster setting, emphasizing careful resource management and preparation. While the driving physics are praised and the art style is appealing, many players find the experience repetitive and lacking in meaningful progression or challenges, leading to a sense of staleness over time. Future updates may enhance cooperative play and address current gameplay shortcomings, but as it stands, the game feels more like a basic driving simulator than a fully realized survival experience.
- “Set in a sparsely populated, post-disaster version of the American wilderness, the game invites players to undertake a long and uncertain journey northward in a battered RV, relying on mechanical know-how, scavenging, and self-sufficiency rather than combat or scripted drama.”
- “Mechanical failures are not rare inconveniences but a central part of the experience, reinforcing the idea that the journey is fragile and progress is never guaranteed.”
- “These mechanics encourage a careful rhythm of travel and rest, where pushing too far without preparation can be just as dangerous as standing still for too long.”
- “Currently, the abundance of bugs and repetitive gameplay content have significantly ruined the gaming experience.”
- “The core mechanic — driving through an endless environment — initially seems relaxing, but the novelty fades quickly due to the absence of progression, AI interactions, survival elements, or even basic incentives to explore.”
- “With no challenges, objectives, or meaningful upgrades, gameplay becomes stale within a very short time.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the art style and find it well-executed for an early access title, others criticize the graphics as mediocre and not matching the expectations set by promotional materials. Additionally, performance issues such as lag are noted, suggesting that adjusting graphic settings may improve the experience. Overall, the visuals seem to be a point of contention among users.
- “For an early access game, I believe it's really well done. I enjoy the graphics, and the aspects of the game of going camping with friends, merged with a survival type aspect, are really enjoyable.”
- “I like the art style a lot, and from the available gameplay mechanics, it's fine.”
- “The graphics are not bad.”
- “I had high hopes for this game, but I was quickly let down. Not only are the graphics bad.”
- “Graphics are mediocre compared to the videos online, and it's just a repetitive driving simulator with no unique story.”
- “Getting beamed forward (and crashing into things) is most likely lag. Try turning down graphic settings, especially VRAM-heavy ones, like texture resolution.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
Overall, the game's optimization is a mixed bag; while performance is generally acceptable even with multiple players, users report bugs, balance issues, and occasional performance dips. Some aspects, like food mechanics, require further refinement, and the world can feel sparse or repetitive during extended play sessions. Despite these issues, many players still find the game enjoyable and promising.
- “Just give them some time, it's a fun game. It feels a bit empty at times and needs polishing here and there, but the performance is okay; no PowerPoint slideshows, even with 3 players.”
- “Very good, but food needs to be optimized and hunger goes down way too fast. Other than that, this game is a 9.5/10. Keep it up!”
- “Bugs, balance issues, and occasional performance problems are part of the current experience, and the world itself can feel sparse or repetitive over long sessions.”
- “Wow, performance is awful.”
- “Just give them some time; it's a fun game, but it feels a bit empty at times and needs polishing here and there.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is criticized for its significant stability issues, with users reporting numerous bugs that hinder enjoyment and gameplay. Many feel it is overpriced given its current state, with little hope for improvement in development. Overall, the consensus is that the game's stability is a major drawback.
- “Worth maybe 5 dollars, about an hour of rough, buggy content in its current state, and I don't see any potential for the development of this game.”
- “Everything is really buggy.”
- “Too buggy to enjoy.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The game's atmosphere is characterized by its reflective exploration of lonely highways and weathered environments, appealing to fans of niche simulation titles that prioritize authenticity. However, some players may find the slow pacing and sparse points of interest less engaging. Overall, the beautiful atmosphere is enhanced by unique dog choices, though additional options would be welcomed.
- “Players who enjoy reflective exploration will find a strong sense of atmosphere in the lonely highways and weather-worn environments.”
- “Its slow pacing and systemic focus will strongly appeal to fans of niche simulation titles that value atmosphere and authenticity over accessibility.”
- “The dog choices are cool, and the atmosphere is beautiful!”
- “Players who enjoy reflective exploration will find a strong sense of atmosphere in the lonely highways and weather-worn environments, while others may feel the lack of dense points of interest or scripted events.”
- “The game attempts to create a haunting atmosphere, but it often falls flat due to repetitive environments and a lack of engaging sound design.”
- “While the visuals are striking, the overall atmosphere feels empty and uninspired, leaving players longing for a more immersive experience.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's story is largely criticized for its absence, with players expressing a desire for more engaging narrative elements, such as quests and character development. Instead, they find the experience to be repetitive and lacking in depth, resembling a driving simulator without a compelling storyline. Overall, the narrative aspect is seen as a significant weakness.
- “There is no real story to engage with.”
- “The game needs more narrative depth; it would be great if the radio provided more information about the storm and offered quests to build bridges to reach new areas before the storm hits.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players feel that the game's monetization strategy is misleading, as the actual content and depth of the game do not match the expectations set by social media advertising.
- “The actual game is nowhere near as in-depth as the advertising on social media implies.”
- “The monetization system feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending money.”
- “I feel like I'm constantly being pushed to buy in-game currency just to keep up with the content.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in "Long Drive North" is characterized by its absurd and relatable scenarios, such as engine failures, unpredictable weather, and comical hunting and cooking mishaps, which collectively create a laugh-out-loud experience for players.
- “$25 retail made me laugh hysterically for a bit.”
- “From busted engines to wild storms, hunting mishaps, and cooking experiments gone wrong, 'Long Drive North' turns the American wilderness into a hilarious trial by asphalt.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game effectively captures the emotional weight of a long journey, emphasizing themes of preparation, patience, and resilience as players earn their progress.
- “Instead, it aims to simulate the emotional weight of a long journey where progress is earned through preparation, patience, and resilience.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is often praised for its immersive quality and ability to enhance the overall atmosphere, with many players noting its emotional depth and memorable melodies. Some reviews highlight the effective use of dynamic soundtracks that adapt to gameplay, while others appreciate the variety of genres incorporated throughout the experience. Overall, the music is considered a standout feature that significantly contributes to the game's appeal.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers note a lack of discovery and reward, indicating that the game offers minimal systems to encourage replayability or creative exploration, ultimately diminishing its long-term appeal.
- “There’s no sense of discovery or reward, and no systems in place to support replayability or creativity.”

Skip Game Offers

Buy Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator

Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator
See offer on Steam

1h Median play time

1h Average play time

1-1h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator

84%939reviews

Zompiercer

2020

Action Adventure

91%5.9kreviews

VEIN

2025

Open World Role Playing Shooter

71%1.8kreviews

Occupy Mars: The Game

2022

Simulation

70%1.2kreviews

Under the Sand

2020

Racing

74%2.7kreviews

HumanitZ

2023

Role Playing

More games like Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator is a simulation game.

Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 1 hours playing Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator.

Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator was released on November 18, 2025.

Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator was developed by Mindflair Games LTD.

Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its humor but disliked it for its gameplay.

Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Zompiercer, VEIN, Occupy Mars: The Game, Under the Sand, HumanitZ and others.

Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator

Platforms

About

Buy Long Drive North: Co-Op RV Simulator