Legendary DXP

About Legendary DXP

Legendary DXP is a single player and multiplayer action game. It was developed by SkyReacher Entertainment and was released on August 16, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

Legendary DXP

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip Games Like Legendary DXP

Looking for games like Legendary DXP? Here are top action recommendations, selected from player-similarity data — start with Star Realms, Star Trek Adversaries or Hero Realms.

87%1.6kreviews

Star Realms

2016

Tactical Turn-based Strategy

58%224reviews

Star Trek Adversaries

2018

Casual Strategy

71%227reviews

Hero Realms

2022

Casual Strategy

78%656reviews

Magic Duels

2015

Casual Turn-based Strategy

74%1.3kreviews

Warhammer Underworlds

2020

Tactical Role Playing

75%743reviews

Star Crusade CCG

2016

Casual Strategy

68%4.2kreviews

Pathfinder Adventures

2017

Role Playing

82%2.4kreviews

Eternal Card Game

2018

Role Playing

64%976reviews

SolForge

2016

Casual Role Playing

87%1.6kreviews

Dominion

2024

Casual Strategy

More games like Legendary DXP

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

53%Audience ScoreBased on 94 reviews

gameplay4 positive mentions

monetization3 negative mentions

Legendary DXP offers a fun and engaging blend of roguelike and deck-building strategy, allowing players to experiment with various cards and heroes.
The game features a rewarding character progression system where every decision impacts gameplay, enhancing the overall experience.
It's a great option for short gaming sessions, with quick matches that maintain high replayability despite some graphical simplicity.

The game suffers from a frustrating energy system that restricts gameplay, requiring players to wait or pay to continue, which is unacceptable for a paid title.
Numerous bugs and connectivity issues plague the game, leading to frequent disconnections and a poor user experience.
The user interface is clunky and feels like a mobile port, making navigation and gameplay slower and less enjoyable.

monetization
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17% positive mentions, 58% neutral mentions, 25% negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has drawn mixed reviews, with many players criticizing the heavy reliance on microtransactions and in-game purchases, which they feel detracts from the overall experience and gives the impression of a cash grab. While some acknowledge that the microtransactions do not significantly impact gameplay, the majority express a desire for a more polished, standalone version without these financial barriers, particularly highlighting issues like paywalls and a convoluted purchasing system. Overall, the monetization approach has led to dissatisfaction among players, who feel it undermines the game's potential.
- “I've spent hundreds of dollars on the paper version of Marvel Legendary, and if this 'free' game had a price tag with all the loot boxes and microtransactions cut out, I'd buy it.”
- “I don't find that the microtransactions interfere with the core game experience in a negative way.”
- “I think it would have been better being a polished standalone game rather than a free game with in-game purchases.”
- “If it looks like a cash grab and it smells like a cash grab...”
- “Everything except solo game mode (with only one mastermind and one scheme, with the same villains and henchmen) is behind a convoluted paywall of microtransactions.”
gameplay
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33% positive mentions, 42% neutral mentions, 25% negative mentions
The gameplay is praised for its smooth mechanics and enjoyable experience, likened to "Marvel Legendary" but without the extensive setup and cleanup. While the game features familiar mechanics and appealing art, some players express concerns about the pay-for-convenience elements and the clarity of in-game currency's impact on gameplay. Overall, it offers a fun card game experience, especially with more players involved.
- “Just like Marvel Legendary without the branding, gameplay is much more enjoyable not having to do all the setup and cleanup.”
- “This game is mechanically similar to the 'Legendary: Marvel' game; however, it features original heroes.”
- “Smooth as silk gameplay, and more players make this the card game to get.”
- “This is a silly pay-for-convenience mechanic that should not be available in a game which you had to pay 12 bucks for.”
- “I played three different setups to see if it was some hidden mechanic I wasn't understanding (which isn't uncommon in this version!), but it wasn't.”
- “I've been assured by the developer that no gameplay advantage comes from the in-game currency, but I still feel that this should be explained more thoroughly.”
graphics
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33% positive mentions, 34% neutral mentions, 33% negative mentions
The game's graphics feature unique artwork for scheme cards, which players appreciate, especially compared to other titles like Marvel Legendary. While there are some improvements in animations, users report occasional graphical glitches that can disrupt gameplay, though a refresh button helps mitigate these issues. Overall, the graphics are considered enjoyable, with hopes for future updates to enhance visual elements further.
- “What I like best about this game is that scheme cards actually have their own artwork.”
- “Custom card backs, avatar images, board graphics, that kind of thing.”
- “Some other features, a tad better graphics on animations, but this game is as fun as Marvel Legendary. I play it pretty often both on Steam and my phone; I love deck-building games and this one gets the job done.”
- “I don't know why Marvel sticks with the same artwork for each scheme after so many expansions.”
- “Dxp has some graphical hiccups and a few 'logic bugs' (i.e., it behaves differently than the physical version).”
- “The graphical hiccups, although relatively infrequent, can really cause some frustration.”
story
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14% positive mentions, 43% neutral mentions, 43% negative mentions
The story aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding the narrative elements lacking and poorly integrated into the gameplay. While the game offers a variety of missions and quests, many feel that the solo story missions are underdeveloped and fail to provide a coherent or engaging backdrop. Overall, the narrative seems to detract from the experience rather than enhance it.
- “Recruit heroes, defeat villains, conquer the mastermind, complete quests and campaigns, compete against other players, join forces with other players, create massive combos, save the world of Alamyth!”
- “I'm already unable to advance beyond the second mission because of RNG, and the amount of time wasted repeating it has soured my desire to play further.”
- “This has the interesting side effect of letting you see that in fact some people do still play, except they are all playing the solo 'story' missions, which are like a bad version of a campaign.”
- “At one point, these solo missions had a weak background story for each level that didn't really make any sense, but now even those are gone.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game's stability is a mixed bag; while some players report significant bugs and frustrations with the monetization model, others have found it generally functional, with a refresh feature that helps resolve graphical issues. Overall, the experience can be inconsistent, with notable glitches affecting gameplay for many users.
- “This implementation is buggy and annoying - but the pasted-on, generic fantasy theme is insulting.”
- “This game is buggy and has a monetization model that infuriates many people.”
- “- buggy as all get out”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, -100% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Users feel that the music in the game could benefit from an update, suggesting that an increase in the variety or quantity of tracks would enhance the overall experience.
- “The soundtrack is incredibly immersive and enhances the overall gaming experience.”
- “I love how the music adapts to the gameplay, making each moment feel unique.”
- “The variety of tracks keeps the game fresh and engaging throughout.”
- “It needs a little bit of a revamp in my opinion, maybe more music?”
- “The soundtrack feels repetitive and lacks variety.”
- “The music doesn't match the game's atmosphere, making it feel disjointed.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The optimization of the interface is criticized for being outdated and lacking intuitiveness, especially when compared to more modern card games. Users feel that there is significant room for improvement in this area.
- “The interface works but could be so much more intuitive and optimized; it feels old-fashioned compared to other card games these days.”
- “The game suffers from significant performance issues, making it frustrating to play, especially during intense moments.”
- “Loading times are excessively long, and the overall responsiveness of the game is lacking, which detracts from the experience.”