Hazard Ops

58%
Game Brain Score Based on 486 reviews
  • story
  • gameplay
  • graphics
Hazard Ops Game Cover
View game
Get on Steam

While the world teeters on the edge of utter chaos in the 21st century, you take on the role of a mercenary in the service of a private military agency. Armed to the teeth, you must eliminate opposing armies and bloodthirsty monster hordes in diverse and turbulent missions. If you survive the countless life-threatening missions, you'll be rewarded handsomely with both money and new equipment items…

  • PC
  • Windows
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

58%
Audience ScoreBased on 486 reviews
story10 positive mentions
monetization4 negative mentions
  • The game offers a fun and enjoyable co-op experience with a variety of missions and game modes.
  • It has a nostalgic feel reminiscent of classic games like Gears of War, providing engaging gameplay.
  • The graphics and character customization options are appealing, making it visually enjoyable.
  • The game is plagued by pay-to-win mechanics, making it difficult for free-to-play users to compete effectively.
  • There are numerous technical issues, including frequent crashes and server connectivity problems.
  • The PvP mode is often unbalanced due to the presence of hackers and players with superior paid gear.
  • story55 mentions

    The game's story aspect is largely criticized for being underdeveloped and lacking depth, with many players noting that it feels more like a collection of missions rather than a cohesive narrative. While there are numerous co-op missions and varied gameplay modes that provide entertainment, the overall storyline is minimal and often overshadowed by gameplay mechanics. Players appreciate the variety of missions and the fun of cooperative play, but many agree that the absence of a significant story detracts from the overall experience.

    • “The matchmaking was fun and I really enjoyed the storyline.”
    • “Overall, very good game, story is separated into maps, much like Left 4 Dead and Killing Floor.”
    • “These are experiences built around a story presented with voice-over.”
    • “Almost no storyline, underdeveloped, demands that players spend a load of money to have a decent playing experience.”
    • “Brilliant game with mechanics like another brilliant game called Gears of War, very interesting missions but lacks a story.”
    • “It's a stupid game for when you don't want to think about tactics or story or really anything at all.”
  • gameplay42 mentions

    The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating its fun, fast-paced mechanics reminiscent of "Gears of War," and the variety of game modes available. However, issues such as lag, clumsy mechanics, and a perceived pay-to-win model have detracted from the overall experience for some users. While some find enjoyment in cooperative play and character customization, others criticize the game's stability and repetitive elements.

    • “The gameplay is very good and the longevity is pretty high too.”
    • “The gameplay is smooth, the character customization, if not a bit pricey (both in and out of game currency), is detailed enough for a free-to-play game.”
    • “The variety of gameplay is fantastic, ranging from deathmatches, robots, zombies, and many others!”
    • “Laggy servers get on my nerves, and the gameplay is terrible.”
    • “Depending on the game mode, there may be additional objectives, but the gameplay pretty much stays the same as I described.”
    • “The bugs in this game can at times ruin the gameplay; if you're playing a mission where you must kill all enemies and one enemy glitches out or gets stuck, you can't continue unless you quit and start a new game.”
  • graphics22 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising them as good or above average, particularly for a free-to-play title, while others criticize them as outdated or even horrible. Many comments highlight that the visuals are decent and enjoyable, especially when considering the game's mechanics and design choices, but there are also significant complaints about the lack of options for customization and the overall visual quality compared to modern standards. Overall, the graphics seem to be a point of contention, with opinions varying widely based on individual expectations and experiences.

    • “The graphics are good for a free-to-play game, and the enemies and bosses are varied.”
    • “Graphics are nice, nothing fancy but excellent design choice and pleasant to the eyes.”
    • “Yes, there can be bugs/issues at certain points, but this game really shines throughout; graphics can be very good (if you have a decent PC) and there is so much you can do in the game.”
    • “The graphics look so outdated.”
    • “The graphics are downright horrible and the controls are so unresponsive, it's unbearable.”
    • “I wanted to change the graphics settings and see what options I have, but hey, there is no option menu anywhere.”
  • monetization8 mentions

    The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing it for being heavily focused on pay-to-win mechanics, particularly in PvP modes, and labeling it a "cash grab" due to high prices for in-game purchases. However, some users appreciate the option to engage in co-op PvE content without the pressure of microtransactions, and note that it is possible to earn items through gameplay. Overall, the monetization strategy has led to dissatisfaction among players who prefer a more upfront payment model.

    • “I would rather pay $20 upfront and have access to all the items in the game than deal with microtransactions.”
    • “In-game purchases are very expensive, and if you want to engage in PvP, it becomes very pay-to-win.”
    • “Extremely expensive in-game purchases.”
    • “And immediately after launching the game for the first time, I was bombarded by pay-to-win messages advertising microtransactions.”
    • “However, I'm still giving this thumbs down mainly for two reasons: 1) in-game purchases are very expensive and if you want to do PvP it becomes very pay-to-win.”
    • “The real money prices are also so absurd to the point that the community screams 'cash grab'.”
  • stability7 mentions

    The stability of the game is a mixed bag, with some players experiencing stable servers and smooth gameplay, while others report frequent glitches, bugs, and connection issues that can disrupt missions and overall enjoyment. Many users find the game frustratingly buggy, particularly during critical moments like entering cover or when enemies get stuck, leading to a need to restart missions. Overall, while some enjoy a stable experience, significant stability issues persist for many players.

    • “Best game I've played so far, with many players, stable servers, no glitches, and endless customization. You can play against players, zombies, robots, dinosaurs, a combination of those, and many more.”
    • “I barely play it, but when I do, it's always glitchy and buggy.”
    • “For one, the bugs in this game can at times ruin the gameplay. If you're playing a mission in which you must kill all enemies and one enemy glitches out or gets stuck, you can't continue unless you quit out and start a new game.”
    • “Sometimes it takes a while for the game to start, and sometimes the game only starts when it feels like it. The connection can be unbearable, resulting in a frantic glitching experience, even though the connection is usually good.”
  • humor6 mentions

    The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players finding it entertaining and funny, particularly in the context of gameplay interactions like taking down opponents. However, some users note that the humor can lose its appeal quickly, especially when combined with frustrations related to pay-to-win mechanics. Overall, it is considered a fun and humorous option for those seeking a lighthearted, fast-paced shooter experience.

    • “I find it hilarious that people are hacking, and mostly when I take them down I just BM the shit out of them.”
    • “If you want a good, funny, fast-paced third-person shooter, this is your game.”
    • “Yes, the game was funny and I thought it would be great.”
  • grinding4 mentions

    The grinding aspect of the game is heavily criticized for being tedious and repetitive, with players facing monotonous levels filled with uninspired enemies and minimal rewards. Many find the process of unlocking permanent weapons and progressing through missions to be overly long and frustrating, particularly when compounded by the reliance on cash shop resources for revives. While it may appeal to those who enjoy grinding in various game modes, the overall experience is marred by a lack of meaningful incentives.

    • “Sadly, that's where most of the game takes place: grinding through endlessly boring levels of super dumb enemies to face a one-hit-killing boss where you can only choose to use a resource from the cash shop to revive or get kicked, with absolutely no rewards whatsoever (thus ignoring the 30 minutes of grinding before that).”
    • “The grind for permanent weapons is long and unlocking new weapons is tedious when the game gets repetitive after you've completed the missions twice or more already, and the cash rewards for completing missions are low.”
    • “It is the perfect little time waster for everyone who likes third-person shooters, coop games, zombies, dinosaurs, vampires, etc., for each person who has no further problem grinding more than one time a multitude of different maps and modes.”
  • music2 mentions

    The music in the game is generally well-received, with players appreciating its balance and lack of overwhelming sound effects. Notably, a standout level features game-inspired music that pays tribute to the classic NES game Contra, which has left a strong impression on players.

    • “After playing it for another day and over 9 more hours, the levels are awesome! It went from decent to amazing. There's a level with game-inspired music and a big tribute to the NES game Contra; I lost my mind when I realized it.”
    • “The soundtrack is incredibly immersive and perfectly complements the gameplay, enhancing the overall experience.”
    • “Each level features unique music that not only sets the mood but also keeps you engaged and motivated to keep playing.”
    • “The audio is fine: not too much music or any annoying sound effects that would drive you crazy.”
    • “After playing it another day and +9 hours more, the levels are awesome. It went from decent to amazing. There's a level with game-inspired music and a big tribute to the NES game Contra; I lost my mind when I realized.”
  • emotional1 mentions

    Players report a strong emotional impact from the game, with some expressing that it moved them to tears. This suggests that the narrative and character development effectively resonate with the audience on a deep emotional level.

    • “I cried.”
    • “The story touched my heart deeply.”
    • “I felt a profound connection to the characters and their struggles.”
  • optimization1 mentions

    Users suggest that lowering the frames per second (fps) can enhance overall game performance, indicating a trade-off between visual fidelity and smoother gameplay.

    • “The optimization options allow for a smoother gameplay experience.”
    • “I love how the game runs efficiently on lower-end hardware thanks to its optimization.”
    • “Decreasing FPS can improve game performance.”
    • “The game is poorly optimized, leading to frequent frame drops and stuttering.”
    • “I experienced significant lag and long loading times, which ruined the overall experience.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Hazard Ops

Play time

5hMedian play time
4hAverage play time
1-5hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 3 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games