Hazard Ops

About

Hazard Ops is a multiplayer action game. It was developed by Yingpei Games and was released on October 8, 2014. It received neutral reviews from players.

While the world teeters on the edge of utter chaos in the 21st century, you take on the role of a mercenary in the service of a private military agency. Armed to the teeth, you must eliminate opposing armies and bloodthirsty monster hordes in diverse and turbulent missions. If you survive the countless life-threatening missions, you'll be rewarded handsomely with both money and new equipment items…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

58%

Audience ScoreBased on 490 reviews

story10 positive mentions

monetization4 negative mentions

The game offers a fun and enjoyable co-op experience with a variety of missions and game modes, reminiscent of Gears of War.
Players appreciate the unique and chaotic gameplay, including the ability to fight against zombies, dinosaurs, and mechs.
Despite its flaws, many players find the game addictive and entertaining, especially when played with friends.

The game is heavily criticized for its pay-to-win model, where players feel pressured to spend real money for better weapons and gear.
Numerous players report persistent technical issues, including crashes, server problems, and difficulty logging in.
The PvP mode is often described as unbalanced and filled with hackers, making it frustrating for players who do not spend money on the game.

story
55 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
73%
9%
The game's story aspect is largely criticized for being underdeveloped and lacking depth, with many players noting that it feels more like a series of missions rather than a cohesive narrative. While there are numerous co-op missions and varied gameplay modes that provide entertainment, the overall storyline is minimal and often overshadowed by gameplay mechanics and repetitive tasks. Despite this, some players appreciate the fun and engaging nature of the missions, suggesting that the focus on gameplay may compensate for the lack of a strong story.
- “The matchmaking was fun and I really enjoyed the storyline.”
- “Overall, very good game, story is separated into maps, much like Left 4 Dead and Killing Floor.”
- “These are experiences built around a story presented with voice-over.”
- “It's a repetitive 3rd person shooter with horrible animations and boring missions.”
- “Almost no storyline, underdeveloped, demands that players spend a load of money to have a decent playing experience.”
- “Brilliant game with mechanics like another brilliant game called Gears of War, very interesting missions but lacks a story.”
gameplay
42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
50%
14%
Gameplay reviews highlight a mix of enjoyment and frustration, with many players appreciating the fun, fast-paced mechanics reminiscent of "Gears of War," while others criticize issues like lag, clumsy mechanics, and a pay-to-win model. Some users find the gameplay engaging, especially in cooperative play, but note that bugs and server problems can detract from the experience. Overall, the gameplay is seen as enjoyable but marred by technical issues and a lack of polish.
- “The gameplay is very good and the longevity is pretty high too.”
- “The gameplay is smooth, the character customization, if not a bit pricey (both in and out of game currency), is detailed enough for a free-to-play game.”
- “The variety of gameplay is fantastic, ranging from deathmatches, robots, zombies, and many others!”
- “Laggy servers get on my nerves; also, the gameplay is terrible.”
- “Depending on the game mode, there may be additional objectives, but the gameplay pretty much stays the same as I described.”
- “For one, the bugs in this game can at times ruin the gameplay. If you're playing a mission in which you must kill all enemies and one enemy glitches out or gets stuck, you can't continue unless you quit out and start a new game.”
graphics
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
59%
18%
23%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising them as good or above average, particularly for a free-to-play title, while others criticize them as outdated or even horrible. Many comments highlight that the visuals are decent and well-designed, but they often fall short when compared to modern standards. Overall, the graphics are seen as serviceable, with some players appreciating their charm despite their simplicity.
- “The graphics are good for a free-to-play game, and the enemies and bosses are varied.”
- “Graphics are nice, nothing fancy but excellent design choice and pleasant to the eyes.”
- “Yes, there can be bugs/issues at certain points, but this game really shines throughout; graphics can be very good (if you have a decent PC) and there is so much you can do in the game.”
- “The graphics look so outdated.”
- “The graphics are downright horrible and the controls are so unresponsive, it's unbearable.”
- “When it comes to the game itself, I was amazed to find game mechanics and graphics so old (simple) that I have to compare them to other games from about 2000-2004.”
monetization
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
23%
44%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players expressing a desire for microtransactions to support the game's longevity, while others criticize the high costs and pay-to-win mechanics, particularly in PvP. Although some appreciate the option to earn in-game purchases through gameplay, many feel that the pricing is excessive and label it a "cash grab." Overall, the community is divided, with a preference for upfront payments over ongoing microtransactions.
- “I hope the devs will bring it back one day, even with microtransactions; I would love to contribute to keep it alive!”
- “I love microtransactions.”
- “I would rather pay $20 upfront and have access to all the items in the game than deal with microtransactions.”
- “And immediately after launching the game for the first time, I was bombarded by pay-to-win messages advertising microtransactions.”
- “However, I'm still giving this a thumbs down mainly for two reasons: 1) in-game purchases are very expensive and if you want to do PvP, it becomes very pay-to-win.”
- “The real money prices are also so absurd to the point that the community screams 'cash grab'.”
stability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
86%
The stability of the game is a mixed bag, with some players experiencing smooth gameplay and stable servers, while others report frequent glitches and bugs that can disrupt missions and overall enjoyment. Issues such as connection problems and game freezes are noted, particularly during critical moments, leading to frustration among users. Overall, while some enjoy a stable experience, many highlight significant stability concerns that detract from the game's potential.
- “Best game I've played so far! Many players, stable servers, no glitches, and endless customization. You can play against players, zombies, robots, dinosaurs, combinations of those, and many more.”
- “I barely play it, but when I do, it's always glitchy and buggy.”
- “Another mildly annoying thing is how buggy the game can be when entering cover; you can die when clearly you weren't supposed to, and various other things can occur, which is just pretty damn annoying.”
- “For one, the bugs in this game can at times ruin the gameplay. If you're playing a mission in which you must kill all enemies and one enemy glitches out or gets stuck, you can't continue unless you quit out and start a new game.”
humor
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players finding it funny and entertaining, especially in the context of fast-paced gameplay and interactions like taking down opponents. However, some users express that the humor can wear thin quickly, particularly when combined with frustrations related to pay-to-win mechanics. Overall, it appeals to those looking for a lighthearted experience in a shooter.
- “I find it hilarious that people are hacking, and mostly when I take them down I just BM the shit out of them.”
- “If you want a good, funny, fast-paced third-person shooter, this is your game.”
- “Yes, the game was funny and I thought it would be great.”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game tedious and repetitive, often feeling that it overshadows the overall experience. Many express frustration with the lack of meaningful rewards for their efforts, particularly when facing challenging bosses that require cash shop resources for revival. While some enjoy the grind for its time-wasting potential, the long paths to unlock permanent weapons and low cash rewards contribute to a sense of monotony.
- “Sadly, that's where most of the game takes place: grinding through endlessly boring levels of super dumb enemies to face a one-hit-killing boss where you can only choose to use a resource from the cash shop to revive or get kicked, with absolutely no rewards whatsoever (thus ignoring the 30 minutes of grinding before that).”
- “The grind for permanent weapons is long and unlocking new weapons is tedious when the game gets repetitive after you've completed the missions twice or more already, and the cash rewards for completing missions are low.”
- “It is the perfect little time waster for everyone who likes third-person shooters, coop games, zombies, dinosaurs, vampires, etc., for each person who has no further problem grinding more than one time a multitude of different maps and modes.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
100%
The music in the game is generally well-received, with players appreciating its balance and lack of overwhelming sound effects. Notably, a level featuring game-inspired music pays homage to the NES classic Contra, which has garnered enthusiastic reactions from players.
- “After playing it for another day and over 9 more hours, the levels are awesome! It went from decent to amazing. There's a level with game-inspired music and a big tribute to the NES game Contra; I lost my mind when I realized it.”
- “The audio is fine: not too much music or any annoying sound effects that would drive you crazy.”
- “After playing it another day and +9 hours more, the levels are awesome. It went from decent to amazing. There's a level with game-inspired music and a big tribute to the NES game Contra; I lost my mind when I realized.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players report a deeply emotional experience, with some expressing that the game moved them to tears.
- “I cried.”
- “The story touched my heart deeply.”
- “I felt a profound connection to the characters and their struggles.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
200%
300%
Users note that lowering the frames per second (fps) can enhance overall game performance, suggesting that optimization may involve adjusting graphical settings for smoother gameplay.
- “The optimization options allow for a smoother gameplay experience.”
- “I appreciate how the game runs efficiently on lower-end hardware.”
- “Decreasing FPS can improve game performance.”
- “The game struggles to maintain a stable frame rate, leading to frequent stutters.”
- “Optimization feels lacking, as the game often runs poorly even on high-end hardware.”