Skip to main content

About

While the world teeters on the edge of utter chaos in the 21st century, you take on the role of a mercenary in the service of a private military agency. Armed to the teeth, you must eliminate opposing armies and bloodthirsty monster hordes in diverse and turbulent missions. If you survive the countless life-threatening missions, you'll be rewarded handsomely with both money and new equipment items…

Hazard Ops screenshot
Hazard Ops screenshot
Hazard Ops screenshot
Hazard Ops screenshot
Hazard Ops screenshot
Hazard Ops screenshot
Hazard Ops screenshot
Hazard Ops screenshot
Hazard Ops screenshot
Hazard Ops screenshot
Hazard Ops screenshot
+8

58%
Audience ScoreBased on 972 reviews
story20 positive mentions
monetization8 negative mentions

  • The game offers a fun and enjoyable co-op experience with various missions and game modes.
  • It has a nostalgic feel reminiscent of Gears of War, providing fast-paced action and engaging gameplay.
  • Despite its flaws, many players find it addictive and appreciate the variety of enemies and weapons available.
  • The game is heavily criticized for its pay-to-win model, making it difficult for free-to-play users to compete in PvP.
  • There are numerous technical issues, including crashes, server problems, and difficulties with account registration.
  • Many players report a lack of support from developers regarding bugs and balance issues, leading to frustration within the community.
  • story
    110 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is largely considered underdeveloped, with many players noting that it lacks a significant narrative and is primarily structured around various mission types and gameplay modes. While some enjoy the cooperative missions and the variety of gameplay experiences, others find the repetitive nature of the missions and the absence of a compelling storyline to be drawbacks. Overall, the focus seems to be more on gameplay mechanics and cooperative play rather than a rich, engaging story.

    • “The matchmaking was fun and I really enjoyed the storyline.”
    • “Overall, very good game, story is separated into maps, much like Left 4 Dead and Killing Floor.”
    • “These are experiences built around a story presented with voice-over.”
    • “Almost no storyline, underdeveloped, demands that players spend a load of money to have a decent playing experience.”
    • “Brilliant game with mechanics like another brilliant game called Gears of War, very interesting missions but lacks a story.”
    • “Alright, so there's no story to really speak of but forget story!”
  • gameplay
    84 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Gameplay reviews highlight a mix of enjoyment and frustration, with many players appreciating the Gears of War-inspired mechanics and fast-paced action, especially in cooperative play. However, issues such as lag, clunky mechanics, and a pay-to-win model detract from the overall experience, leading to a polarized reception. While some find the gameplay fun and engaging, others criticize it for being repetitive or plagued by bugs that hinder progress.

    • “The gameplay is very good and the longevity is pretty high too.”
    • “The variety of gameplay is fantastic, ranging from deathmatches, robots, zombies, and many others!”
    • “The gameplay is smooth, the character customization, if not a bit pricey (both in and out of game currency), is detailed enough for a free-to-play game.”
    • “Laggy servers get on my nerves; also, the gameplay is terrible.”
    • “Clumsy gameplay mechanics and annoying in-game lag that makes you warp more than run (note that I have a good connection without the slightest lag in other games).”
    • “For one, the bugs in this game can at times ruin the gameplay. If you're playing a mission in which you must kill all enemies and one enemy glitches out/gets stuck, you can't continue unless you quit out and start a new game.”
  • graphics
    44 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players finding them outdated and below average, while others appreciate their design and smoothness, especially for a free-to-play title. Many comments highlight that the visuals are decent but not groundbreaking, with some praising the game's aesthetic choices and others criticizing the lack of customization options. Overall, the graphics are seen as serviceable, appealing to those who may not have high expectations from modern games.

    • “The graphics are good for a free-to-play game and the enemies and bosses are varied.”
    • “Graphics are great thanks to the Unreal Engine, very smooth, and I love the 'Gears of War' style reload mechanic; ahhh, takes me back!”
    • “Graphics are nice, nothing fancy but excellent design choice and pleasant to the eyes.”
    • “The graphics look so outdated.”
    • “The graphics are downright horrible and the controls are so unresponsive, it's unbearable.”
    • “I wanted to change the graphics settings and see what options I have, but hey, there is no option menu anywhere.”
  • monetization
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization model of the game has received significant criticism for being heavily focused on microtransactions, particularly in PvP modes, which many players feel leads to a pay-to-win environment. While some appreciate the option to earn in-game purchases through gameplay and enjoy the co-op PvE experience, the overall sentiment leans towards viewing the pricing as excessive and exploitative, with many labeling it a "cash grab."

    • “I would rather pay $20 up front and have access to all the items in the game than deal with microtransactions.”
    • “In-game purchases are very expensive, and if you want to do PvP, it becomes very pay-to-win.”
    • “Extremely expensive in-game purchases.”
    • “And immediately after launching the game for the first time, I was bombarded by pay-to-win messages advertising microtransactions.”
    • “However, I'm still giving this thumbs down mainly for two reasons: 1) in-game purchases are very expensive and if you want to do PvP it becomes very pay-to-win.”
    • “The real money prices are also so absurd to the point that the community screams 'cash grab'.”
  • stability
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is a mixed bag, with some players experiencing frequent glitches and bugs that can disrupt gameplay, particularly during critical missions. While many users report stable servers and smooth performance most of the time, issues such as long loading times, connection problems, and bugs when entering cover can lead to frustrating experiences. Overall, while the game has potential, its stability issues significantly detract from the enjoyment for some players.

    • “Best game I played so far, many players, stable servers, no glitches, endless customization... you can play against players, zombies, robots, dinosaurs, combinations of those, and many more.”
    • “I barely play it, but when I do, it's always glitchy/buggy.”
    • “Another mildly annoying thing is how buggy the game can be when entering cover; you can die when clearly you weren't supposed to, and various other things can occur, which is just pretty damn annoying.”
    • “For one, the bugs in this game can at times ruin the gameplay. If you're playing a mission in which you must kill all enemies and one enemy glitches out or gets stuck, you can't continue unless you quit out and start a new game.”
  • humor
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players finding it funny and entertaining, particularly in the context of fast-paced gameplay and interactions with other players. However, some users note that the humor can wear thin quickly, especially when combined with frustrations like pay-to-win mechanics. Overall, it appeals to those looking for a lighthearted experience in a third-person shooter.

    • “If you want a good, funny fast-paced third-person shooter, this is your game.”
    • “Yes, the game was funny and I thought it would be great.”
    • “I find it hilarious that people are hacking, and mostly when I take them down I just BM them.”
  • grinding
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game is heavily criticized, with players noting that it involves tedious and repetitive gameplay against uninspired enemies, leading to a lack of meaningful rewards. Many feel that the grind for unlocking permanent weapons is excessively long and unfulfilling, especially given the low cash rewards for completing missions. While it may appeal to those who enjoy time-wasting in various modes, the overall sentiment is that the grinding detracts significantly from the experience.

    • “Sadly, that's where most of the game takes place: grinding through endlessly boring levels of super dumb enemies to face a one-hit-killing boss where you can only choose to use a resource from the cash shop to revive or get kicked, with absolutely no rewards whatsoever (thus ignoring the 30 minutes of grinding before that).”
    • “The grind for permanent weapons is long and unlocking new weapons is tedious when the game gets repetitive after you've completed the missions twice or more already, and the cash rewards for completing missions are low.”
    • “It is the perfect little time waster for everyone who likes third-person shooters, coop games, zombies, dinosaurs, vampires, etc., for each person who has no further problem grinding more than one time across a multitude of different maps and modes.”
  • music
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally well-received, with players appreciating the balance of audio that avoids being overwhelming or irritating. Notably, a level featuring game-inspired music pays homage to the NES classic Contra, which has garnered enthusiastic reactions from players. Overall, the soundtrack enhances the gaming experience, evolving from decent to impressive as players progress.

    • “The audio is fine: not too much music or any annoying sound effects that would drive you crazy.”
    • “After playing it another day and +9 hours more, the levels are awesome. It went from decent to amazing. There's a level with game-inspired music and a big tribute to the NES game Contra; I lost my mind when I realized.”
  • emotional
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players overwhelmingly express that the game evokes strong emotions, with many stating that it brought them to tears, highlighting its profound impact on their emotional experience.

    • “I cried.”
    • “I cried.”
  • optimization
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users note that lowering the frames per second (fps) can enhance overall game performance, suggesting that optimization may involve adjusting graphical settings for smoother gameplay.

Buy Hazard Ops

5h Median play time
4h Average play time
1-5h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 6 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Hazard Ops

Warface: Clutch Image
Blacklight: Retribution ImageBlacklight: Retribution ImageBlacklight: Retribution Image
Killing Floor 2 Image
This game contains adult content
Black Squad Image
War Trigger 3 Image
S.K.I.L.L.: Special Force 2 Image
Counter-Strike Nexon Image
This game contains adult content
Ironsight Image
Line of Sight Image
Survarium Image
This game contains adult content