Gear Up

About

Gear Up is a multiplayer shooter game with warfare and science fiction themes. It was developed by Doctor Entertainment AB and was released on January 28, 2015. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Feel the adrenaline as you control your unique tank in multiplayer arcade action! Build your ultimate war machine from over a million different combinations. Now, will you go for the rumbling caterpillar tracks or the crawling spider legs?

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Multi-Player

Skip User Reviews

71%

Audience ScoreBased on 4,412 reviews

gameplay134 positive mentions

stability81 negative mentions

Fun and easy to get into after a few matches.
Tank customization is the highlight, allowing for various play styles.
Gameplay is flexible and enjoyable, making it a nice casual experience.

The game has a very low player base, making matches hard to find.
It can feel repetitive and lacks depth in gameplay.
There are issues with balance, often leading to new players being overwhelmed by veterans.

gameplay
309 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
51%
6%
The gameplay is generally described as fast-paced, flexible, and enjoyable, allowing for both casual play and strategic customization of vehicles. However, many players express frustration with issues such as a lack of balance, repetitive mechanics, and a dwindling player base, which can detract from the overall experience. While the game features engaging mechanics and a cartoonish art style, it suffers from bugs and matchmaking problems that hinder long-term enjoyment.
- “The gameplay is fast and simple, with classic shooter modes, but it becomes fun and entertaining with all the different weapons and other parts combinations every player can put on their vehicle.”
- “Gameplay is flexible and enjoyable whether you want to play aggressively or just mess around, making it a nice casual experience.”
- “The gameplay is fun, free to play (mostly all of it is free to play), and the design is addictive.”
- “Sadly, the gameplay itself isn't fun that much.”
- “Add this on top of how buggy the game is, how jerky and uncomfortable the general gameplay is, and the serious lack of players, the game simply isn't enjoyable for any elongated period of time.”
- “This game is honest shit, there is no training mode for new people, no tutorial, and the gameplay is the fucking shittiest I've seen in the years I've been gaming, not fucking worth anyone's time.”
graphics
291 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
52%
43%
5%
The graphics of the game are generally praised for their cartoonish aesthetic and vibrant art style, which many players find charming and fitting for the gameplay. However, there are significant concerns regarding optimization, as numerous users report performance issues, including low frame rates and crashes when adjusting graphic settings. Overall, while the visuals are appealing, the game's performance on various systems can detract from the experience.
- “The graphics are good, the animations great and the controls fantastic!”
- “The graphics are charming and I love the style.”
- “The graphics are very aesthetically pleasing and the game is quite easy!”
- “I have 250-200 fps but after like 10 minutes it goes below 20 fps no matter what graphic settings I use!”
- “This game has bad graphics and low fps; even when I played another game with ultra graphics and high fps, this game runs poorly on low settings.”
- “The game crashes when loading a map, at random times while on the map, while changing graphics options, when you spawn, when you die, when returning to the menu, when clicking through the menu.”
stability
84 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
96%
The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous reports of frequent crashes, freezes, and various bugs that significantly hinder gameplay. While some players note that it runs well on lower-end systems, the overall experience is marred by server issues, graphical glitches, and unresponsive menus, making it difficult to enjoy for extended periods. Despite some positive remarks about its potential and fun elements, the consensus leans towards it being a frustratingly unstable experience.
- “Great little game that runs great on a potato!”
- “It's a small download and it runs great even on my very aged PC, so you can download it and see if people are still playing. It won't take much time to do, and who knows, you might just have fun. If you decide to support the developer, you already know beforehand if that's a good option for you or not.”
- “The game looks great and probably runs well (depending on your PC). Please try this game out and have better luck than I did.”
- “The game is poorly unbalanced and freezes if you right-click in any menu.”
- “The game freezes and crashes consistently for me, and given the graphics, I do not feel that should be an issue.”
- “Crashes almost every game, freezes frequently, and the Steam overlay does not work.”
optimization
70 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
57%
27%
The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues, particularly on lower-end systems and macOS. While some updates have improved stability and reduced lag, others still experience stuttering and crashes, leading to frustration. Overall, the game is seen as needing further optimization to enhance the experience for a broader range of hardware.
- “Performance feels solid after updates, and earning XP and cash doesn’t feel frustrating.”
- “The game has updated significantly in terms of bug fixes and massive performance improvements, so I can definitely say that it's worth playing.”
- “It's easy to get the hang of relatively quickly and it's pretty well optimized.”
- “The macOS version of this game is poorly optimized.”
- “This game is horribly optimized, and seems to lag even with low graphics settings on a decent computer.”
- “While a great game and concept overall, the terrible optimization and lag issues make it unplayable.”
humor
53 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
96%
4%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with many players finding it to be one of the funniest experiences they've had, particularly when playing with friends. The quirky graphics and amusing gameplay elements, such as funny tank designs and chaotic moments, contribute to its charm, despite some players noting technical issues and balance problems. Overall, the game is described as a lighthearted and entertaining option, especially for those looking to enjoy humorous multiplayer interactions.
- “One of the funniest games I have ever played, a lot of competition and funny moments, great for making friends and it has a lot more content than it seems, beautiful indie game.”
- “It's colorful, funny, and stupidly fun.”
- “Amazing game with friends, funny, fast, and fun.”
- “Not funny at all, just like Robocraft.”
- “Bad balance and only Russian cheaters - not funny, no way to survive.”
grinding
45 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
3%
93%
The reviews indicate that grinding in the game is a mixed experience; while some players find it tedious and frustrating, especially at the beginning, others appreciate that it allows for fair progression without excessive time investment. Many note that while grinding is necessary to unlock parts and upgrades, it can be mitigated through gameplay or microtransactions, leading to a perception of it being either manageable or overly demanding depending on the player's approach. Overall, the game offers a balance between grinding and enjoyment, but the experience can vary significantly based on individual preferences and play styles.
- “Obtaining currency is really fast (unless you keep leaving matches), so it's not grindy at all.”
- “Not grindy.”
- “Kinda grindy and senseless.”
- “The currency in this game used to buy anything is so painstaking to earn that it's like the developers are putting you on a treadmill that they are slowly making go faster and faster with a button on the end of it, whilst they say 'for only $19.99, you can push that button and stop the treadmill...'. So if you don't want to put the money down on it, you'll have to expect hours upon hours of farming.”
- “The game is buggy, hard to play for long periods of time, as it's either frustrating, horrifically slow, or flat-out boring from the grinding, and is far too 'pay-to-win' for most people's taste.”
monetization
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
57%
31%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players criticizing the reliance on microtransactions and the perception of a pay-to-win model, while others appreciate the absence of intrusive in-game purchases. Many users express frustration over the grinding required to progress without spending money, although a few highlight that the game offers optional cosmetic purchases and does not heavily impact gameplay balance. Overall, the sentiment reflects a struggle between the desire for fair monetization and the pitfalls of free-to-play models.
- “Great fun, easy leveling system, has in-game purchases but they're not needed at all.”
- “Combine this with a welcome absence of microtransactions and you have a free-to-play game that is a cut above its contemporaries.”
- “It has almost no in-game purchases and the purchases it does offer can either be obtained in about 30 minutes or are purely cosmetic.”
- “It pretty much relies on microtransactions to get good.”
- “You have to grind for hours just to get a few new parts so that you can fail a little less miserably. Otherwise, I would definitely recommend... if you have money to endlessly give away to game developers. This game is what's wrong with the free-to-play genre; microtransactions at every corner.”
- “I also dislike the idea of having to pay to have more than 6 things in my inventory in a 'free-to-play' game... microtransactions are one thing, but that's basically pay-to-win in my book.”
music
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
61%
13%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the small but high-quality electronic-orchestral soundtrack, others find it repetitive and lacking during gameplay. Many noted that the absence of music during key moments detracts from the overall experience, although some tracks are praised for their ability to create a relaxed atmosphere amidst the action. Overall, there is a desire for a more dynamic and engaging musical presence throughout the game.
- “While the soundtrack is small and limited, it's great for what it is.”
- “It took me a while to finally get to hear some of the tracks, as constant gunfire can sometimes get in the way, but I really need to compliment the music, as it makes you feel much more relaxed and keeps you from raging when someone annihilates your craft.”
- “High quality audio, game sounds are great, music is upbeat.”
- “The music, what little there is, quickly becomes repetitive and boring.”
- “Mostly I played this game with both the sound and music turned down pretty far.”
- “And this game severely lacks cool battle music.”
story
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
62%
19%
The game lacks a traditional story, with many users noting the absence of a main campaign or backstory, focusing instead on online multiplayer battles and challenges. While some players appreciate the simplicity and fun of the gameplay, the overall consensus is that the game does not offer a narrative experience.
- “I'll summarize my feelings of this game with a story: once upon a time, there was a boy named Jonathan. He had very few friends and even fewer interests.”
- “Part of that I believe came from the simplicity of it all; it didn't bother with some complex and dramatic story.”
- “Even though it doesn't really have a story, it's still extremely fun.”
- “There is no story, just an online battle game.”
- “The game itself has no real backstory, but I guess not every game does (especially if it's just for fun).”
- “Sadly... it's a dead game now, only a small number of people play this game (roughly less than 10) with 1 person being the kingpin and destroying everyone else constantly.”
replayability
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The game's replayability is generally viewed as strong due to its easy learning curve and variety of weapon types and tank modifications. However, some players feel it lacks depth due to a limited number of maps and game modes, which can lead to a sense of staleness over time. Suggestions for improvement include adding features like a bot system for matchmaking and a beginners league to enhance the experience for new players.
- “ Infinitely replayable.”
- “Easy to learn how to play, great replayability with different weapon types and modifications to your tank.”
- “A great game with good replayability, but it slightly lacks balance (in terms of weaponry); overall, it's an above-decent game.”
- “However, the game doesn't have much replay value, and gets a bit stale due to the limited amount of maps and game modes.”
- “This game is great for killing time, or for a quick adrenaline-filled series of battles, but don't expect the replayability of some classics like Call of Duty at the moment, because the rank system hardly matters from what I've noticed, and if you ever burn out on the game there's nothing to reel you back in aside from the possibility of trying new part combinations.”
- “If there was something that the devs could add, possibly adding a bot similar to a game called Pocket Fleet (if someone joins the server, a bot joins the opposing side until another player enters the server) could make it feel a bit more playable.”
emotional
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a deep emotional connection to the game, often tied to childhood memories, which can evoke feelings of nostalgia and self-reflection. However, the game's impact can also lead to negative emotional experiences, such as self-doubt and fear, resulting in lasting emotional scars that affect players' perceptions of themselves and their interactions in online spaces. Despite its aesthetic brilliance, the game's design flaws contribute to a heartbreaking experience for some, highlighting the complex emotional landscape it creates.
- “The simple act of launching *Gear Up* was no longer a fun escape—it was an emotional minefield, one that I had no control over.”
- “It wasn’t just the game that started to eat at me—it was the way the game made me feel about myself.”
- “I eventually stopped playing the game, but the emotional scars it left behind lingered.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The atmosphere of the game is described as both toxic and immersive, with some players feeling overwhelmed by its darker elements, while others appreciate its whimsical, toy-box quality and engaging variety. Overall, it creates a lasting impression, balancing fun with emotional depth.
- “This game is a small but fun game with a wonderful atmosphere.”
- “My depression deepened as I became consumed by the toxic atmosphere that surrounded me.”
- “The toy-box atmosphere, simple controls, and variety of vehicle combinations create a lasting experience that leaves an impression.”