Skip to main content
Galaxy Reavers 2 - Season 3 Game Cover

About

Galaxy Reavers 2 - Season 3 is a single player casual strategy game. It received neutral reviews from players.

Conquer the GALAXY in this RTS space game on a sci-fi theme. PVP & PVE battle.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

56%
Audience ScoreBased on 580 reviews
gameplay24 positive mentions
stability17 negative mentions

  • The game features enjoyable gameplay with a fun sci-fi theme and strategic elements, making it appealing to fans of the genre.
  • It is relatively free-to-play friendly, allowing players to remain competitive without spending excessive amounts of money.
  • The developers have shown responsiveness to player feedback, fixing many bugs and issues over time.
  • The game suffers from frequent crashes and connectivity issues, making it frustrating to play, especially during battles.
  • There are significant pay-to-win elements, with players who spend money gaining substantial advantages over free-to-play users.
  • The tutorial is overly long and restrictive, hindering player engagement and enjoyment from the start.
  • gameplay
    49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Gameplay reviews highlight a mix of positive and negative experiences. Many players appreciate the fun mechanics, customization options, and smooth controls, while others criticize the overwhelming number of currencies, lack of proper tutorials, and issues with pay-to-win elements. Overall, while the core gameplay is engaging and offers strategic depth, it is marred by grindy mechanics, unclear instructions, and network stability problems.

    • “Great gameplay with tons of customization!”
    • “The gameplay is super fun.”
    • “The different ships and weapons make for strategic gameplay while also being quite relaxed when necessary.”
    • “We know by now these don't work, because they don't let the player engage with gameplay elements; they just train the player to tap what they're told.”
    • “Game mechanics are not fully explained, like energy, heat, and CPU.”
    • “Controls are absolutely awful; they make gameplay pointless; you might as well play an idle game.”
  • graphics
    41 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the graphics of the game have received positive feedback, with many users praising their quality, detail, and smooth performance even on low-end devices. However, some players have reported issues with crashes and server connectivity that detract from the overall experience. Despite these concerns, the visual design, including ship and UI aesthetics, is frequently highlighted as a strong point of the game.

    • “The graphics look amazing, and personally I really like the UI.”
    • “Great game, nice graphics and no need to pay money to progress.”
    • “Fantastic game, even better than the first one, great graphics, loads to do.”
    • “Graphics are confusing, very abrupt intro to gameplay.”
    • “Game graphics are amazing but the game is not good.”
    • “Then at first mission another character that has a face like he's having anal surgery without anaesthetic.”
  • story
    38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it challenging to follow due to poor English and unclear narrative elements. While some appreciate the storyline's potential and find it rewarding, others criticize it for being convoluted and lacking depth, often feeling like a grind due to the energy system limiting mission attempts. Overall, the story is seen as an improvement from the previous installment, but it still requires significant refinement in both writing and mechanics.

    • “The storyline and the battle pattern are very enjoyable.”
    • “Very rewarding storyline.”
    • “It's a definite upgrade in terms of story from part 1 but needs some work on the mechanics and leveling up.”
    • “The English is terrible, the story is pointless, but the ship customizability and gameplay make it a good game overall.”
    • “The story is written in terribly broken English that's hard to follow a lot of the time.”
    • “It's a step up from the first game in some ways, but it's a big step back in other ways. Things that got improved include new ships/weapons, but a proper storyline with characters is lacking.”
  • stability
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is significantly compromised, with numerous reports of freezing issues, crashes, and bugs that disrupt gameplay, including during critical moments like tutorials and battles. Players frequently experience forced restarts and loss of progress, leading to frustration and a need for frequent reinstalls. While some improvements have been noted since the previous version, the persistent glitches detract from the overall experience, prompting calls for urgent updates.

    • “Most of the red-colored battle markers on the campaign map are bugged and freeze.”
    • “Sometimes the screen goes black and freezes my phone to the point where I can't even close the app.”
    • “20 minutes of play and I've already encountered two glitches that lock the game and force a restart.”
  • grinding
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players generally find the game to be quite grindy, often feeling that the effort required does not yield sufficient rewards. While many enjoy the gameplay and challenges, the energy system and various currencies contribute to a tedious leveling process that can lead to frustration and boredom, particularly after the initial stages. Despite these issues, some players appreciate the sense of accomplishment that comes from overcoming grinding challenges.

    • “It got very grindy without much payoff.”
    • “A lot of grinding after the first 3 days.”
    • “Fun until level 25, then your grinding slowly; it took me like 2 months to get to level 60.”
  • monetization
    13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the absence of ads and the option to progress without spending money, while others criticize the high costs of in-game purchases and the prevalence of microtransactions, labeling it a "cash grab." Additionally, the introduction of a stamina system and the disparity between promotional materials and actual gameplay have further fueled dissatisfaction among users. Overall, while some players find value in the game, many feel that monetization strategies detract from the experience.

    • “No ads, no need to pay to win if you are prepared to spend the time it takes to level up.”
    • “No ads at all!!!”
    • “Great game, like all mobile game apps, microtransactions are a big part.”
    • “The in-game purchase costs are way too high.”
    • “-3 stars for adding a stamina system, way more microtransactions than the first game.”
    • “This one is pay-to-win and full of microtransactions.”
  • humor
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is characterized by its intentionally poor English and absurdly amusing names, such as "death star fort," which contribute to a lighthearted and comedic experience. Players find the awkward phrasing of in-game awards, like "your side not die," to be particularly entertaining.

    • “Not to mention the terrible English and hilariously bad names like 'Death Star Fort' and end-of-battle awards like 'Your Side Not Die'.”
    • “The humor in the game is top-notch, with witty dialogue and absurd situations that keep you laughing.”
    • “I love how the game doesn't take itself too seriously, with funny character interactions and ridiculous quests.”
  • optimization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players have expressed frustration with the optimization of the second game in the series, noting that it suffers from poor performance, which detracts from the overall experience, especially for those who enjoyed the first game.

    • “It's a pity that I played Galaxy Reavers to death, only to be blocked by the poor performance of the second game.”
    • “The optimization is so lacking that it ruins the overall experience.”
    • “I was really excited for this game, but the constant lag and frame drops make it unplayable.”
  • music
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in "X: Rebirth" has received mixed reviews, with some users appreciating the soundtrack but criticizing the use of content from other creators, such as music from Two Steps from Hell and trailers from EVE Online. This has led to a lower rating, with some reviewers feeling that originality is lacking. Overall, while the soundtrack has its merits, concerns about copyright and originality overshadow its reception.

    • “You have to use a trailer from EVE Online and steal music from Two Steps from Hell?”
  • replayability
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers significant replayability due to extensive customization options, stunning visuals, and a robust PvP system, making it enjoyable for daily play.

    • “The game has tons of customization, is visually stunning, and offers a great deal of replayability. The PvP system is excellent, and the list of features just goes on.”
    • “There is good daily replayability.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Galaxy Reavers 2 - Season 3

40h Median play time
40h Average play time
40-40h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Games Like Galaxy Reavers 2 - Season 3
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Galaxy Reavers 2 - Season 3 is a casual strategy game.

Galaxy Reavers 2 - Season 3 is available on Phone and Tablet.

On average players spend around 40 hours playing Galaxy Reavers 2 - Season 3.

Galaxy Reavers 2 - Season 3 was developed by TBG LIMITED.

Galaxy Reavers 2 - Season 3 has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its story.

Galaxy Reavers 2 - Season 3 is a single player game.

Similar games include Hyper Heroes: Marble-Like RPG, War Dragons, State of Survival: Zombie War, Star Trek Timelines, Warpath: Ace Shooter and others.