Fleeting Ages

About

Fleeting Ages is a single player action game. It was developed by R&G Software and was released on May 1, 2016. It received negative reviews from players.

Fleeting Ages is an open world game with strong survival elements and with a constantly changing world and ages. The game features a huge open island and seven time periods that change as the player progresses.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

35%

Audience ScoreBased on 17 reviews

gameplay2 negative mentions

The game shows potential with a solid understanding of Unity and runs smoothly without camera stutter.
The crafting system is straightforward and allows for gradual building, which is appreciated by players.
The developers are actively working on improvements and the game has captivated some players despite its early access state.

The game is considered boring and lacks engaging gameplay, with many reviewers stating it feels unfinished.
Combat mechanics are frustrating, with poor hit detection and quick weapon degradation making it difficult to survive.
The graphics and overall design are criticized as outdated and unpolished, resembling a low-quality asset flip.

gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The gameplay in Fleeting Ages is generally considered lackluster, with uninspired combat and frustrating design choices, making it difficult to recommend unless discounted. However, some players appreciate certain game mechanics that enhance the experience.
- “That's a great game mechanic that I've appreciated in other games, and I'm glad to see it here.”
- “Whilst there is nothing outright broken in Fleeting Ages, the lackluster gameplay and combat, combined with some frustrating gameplay choices, makes it hard to recommend unless on sale.”
- “Whilst there is nothing outright broken in Fleeting Ages, the lackluster gameplay and combat, combined with some frustrating gameplay choices, makes it hard to recommend unless on sale.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics have received mixed reviews, with some users noting poor optimization that leads to low frame rates, even compared to less demanding titles like Ark: Survival Evolved. While performance issues were not universally experienced, the overall visual quality does not meet expectations, especially when compared to higher standards in the genre.
- “I did not have any problems with performance as some people reported, but the graphics are not exactly Far Cry 3 either.”
- “The game is barely playable; optimization is horrible, and for these graphics, it gives you FPS even lower than Ark: Survival Evolved, which isn't perfectly optimized either.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some users reporting no performance issues, while others criticize it as "horrible," noting that it struggles to maintain playable frame rates despite relatively low graphical fidelity. Overall, the game's performance appears inconsistent, with significant room for improvement.
- “The game is barely playable; the optimization is horrible, and for these graphics, it gives you FPS even lower than Ark: Survival Evolved, which isn't perfectly optimized either.”
- “I did not have any problems with performance as some people reported, but then the graphics are not exactly Far Cry 3 either.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is criticized for its lack of stability, with users reporting numerous bugs that suggest it was not ready for release.
- “It's far too buggy for release still.”