Skip to main content
Fire & Maneuver Game Cover

About

Fire & Maneuver is a single player and multiplayer strategy game. It was developed by Armchair History Interactive and was released on April 19, 2023. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"Fire & Maneuver" is a tactical wargame that simulates company-level battles during the Cold War. Players can command NATO or Soviet forces and use a variety of units, terrain, and weather conditions to gain an advantage. The game features a detailed combat system, turn-based gameplay, and historical scenarios.

Skip User Reviews

78%
Audience ScoreBased on 2,160 reviews
gameplay91 positive mentions
stability123 negative mentions

  • Unique turn-based strategy gameplay that combines elements of chess and historical warfare.
  • Visually appealing art style and engaging soundtrack that enhances the gaming experience.
  • Diverse factions with distinct strengths and weaknesses, allowing for varied strategies.
  • Numerous bugs and glitches that hinder gameplay, including issues with loading screens and unresponsive commands.
  • Poorly designed tutorial that fails to adequately teach players the game's mechanics.
  • Clunky user interface that makes it difficult to navigate and understand unit actions.
  • gameplay
    256 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game is characterized by its unique mechanics and historical accuracy, offering a blend of turn-based strategy and tactical depth that many players find engaging. While the core mechanics are generally praised for their simplicity and potential for complex strategies, numerous reviews highlight issues such as a lack of intuitive tutorials, clunky user interface, and various bugs that detract from the overall experience. Despite these flaws, many players appreciate the game's artistic style and the fun derived from mastering its systems, indicating a solid foundation that could improve with further development.

    • “Great gameplay and so much to do, the combat mechanics are great and this is a very fun game to play.”
    • “The gameplay is excellent, and that's what matters most in this type of game.”
    • “The core gameplay is fun and I didn't have any troubles with the rules since I played the old tabletop version.”
    • “The gameplay is simple and the historic background of it does not really come to life, and the points system in the game has the sole purpose of creating artificial interest to keep going, but it is so artificial that I’d rather try to get drunk on an alcohol-free beer.”
    • “I'll be blunt, the game concept is pretty interesting, and just the setting alone is something that I feel is underrated; but holy hell, does the gameplay feel clunky.”
    • “The core gameplay consists of designing an army and deploying it, but the mechanics are less than average for a turn-based strategy game.”
  • graphics
    219 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the unique art style and visual charm, particularly its historical aesthetics. However, numerous players report significant performance issues, including poor optimization and lag, even on capable hardware, which detracts from the overall experience. While some find the graphics appealing and fitting for the game's theme, others criticize them as subpar and in need of improvement, particularly in terms of detail and user interface clarity.

    • “The visuals are amazing, and the maps are the best.”
    • “The art style is beautiful as well.”
    • “Wonderful graphics, amazing attention to details and a lot of potential are the qualities of this incredible game that reminds us of the glory found in the Victorian era.”
    • “Poorly optimized; I get better graphics and more FPS in CS2 than this game at its lowest settings and lowest resolution.”
    • “The performance was also pitiful considering its art style, lagging out my gaming laptop (with a decent i5 processor and a 4050 laptop graphics card) when it runs other more intensive games just fine.”
    • “The graphics are fine, but wow, they are just horrible behind the scenes. I have an alright GPU (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650), but this game somehow eats up 70% of it during gameplay, so unless you have a powerful GPU, expect some problems in that area.”
  • stability
    124 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous reports of bugs and glitches that significantly hinder gameplay, including game-breaking issues and frequent crashes. While some players find enjoyment in the game despite its flaws, many express frustration over its poor optimization and lack of updates, leading to an overall perception of it being unfinished and unplayable at times. Despite its potential, the game's current state is marred by instability, making it difficult for players to fully engage with the experience.

    • “The game is abandoned in a poorly optimized and buggy state.”
    • “So buggy that it is literally unplayable and game quality seems terrible.”
    • “Game is very buggy, randomly freezes or crashes, or gets stuck on a loading screen.”
  • music
    50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received largely positive feedback, with many players praising its historical accuracy and emotional impact, enhancing the overall gameplay experience. While some users noted issues with repetitiveness and bugs affecting the music, the soundtrack is often described as a standout feature, featuring well-crafted compositions that resonate with the game's themes. Overall, the art and music are seen as highlights, contributing significantly to the game's immersive atmosphere.

    • “Music is well crafted with clear research into historic tunes from each nation and then recreated and composed to sound brilliant and epic!”
    • “The soundtrack is patriotic and beautifully made, and the art style fits perfectly with the gameplay.”
    • “The music is fantastic and really sets the stage of the battles.”
    • “None of the music really stands out as such but it does the job well enough.”
    • “Music just ends leaving you with an uncomfortable silence.”
    • “The music is... repetitive.”
  • optimization
    39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization is widely criticized, with players reporting severe performance issues, bugs, and lag even on capable hardware. Many users express frustration over the lack of improvements and focus on new content rather than fixing existing problems, leading to a frustrating experience. While some acknowledge the game's potential, the consensus is that significant optimization is needed for a smoother gameplay experience.

    • “Very high quality, no bugs, nor performance issues.”
    • “Will make a fine game with optimization though.”
    • “Honestly one of my favorite strategy games but could really use some optimization.”
    • “The game is very poorly optimized and buggy, with several bugs being totally game-breaking.”
    • “I returned after release and I can't even play the game; it is extremely buggy, freezes, doesn't register clicks, and quite frankly the game is dead. The game is terribly optimized; I recommend an Intel i5... I'm running an RTX 3050 Ti and this 10GB game is running like dog water.”
    • “The optimization for the game is still pretty lackluster, which is understandable since it is an early access game, but it is pretty disappointing seeing my computer struggle on a turn-based strategy.”
  • grinding
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews of the "grinding" aspect highlight a mixed experience; while some players find the attrition strategy engaging, others feel that the game can become tedious due to slow pacing, clunky UI, and repetitive battles on the same maps. Although some appreciate the unique faction experiences and the developers' efforts to reduce grindiness, many express frustration with the AI and the manual order system, which can detract from the overall enjoyment. Overall, the game presents a balance between strategic depth and potential monotony, depending on player preferences.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “The game feels very tedious to play.”
    • “Campaigns involve you grinding against and beating down AI armies, often on the exact same map.”
    • “The game as is, is very simplistic, and not extremely difficult, but it is extremely tedious, specifically in the single player campaign because of how abhorrent the AI is.”
  • story
    18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of depth and coherence, with players noting that the missions feel disconnected and the tutorial fails to adequately prepare them for the campaign. Additionally, the introduction of paid DLC for additional factions and missions is seen as exploitative, detracting from the overall experience. While some missions are enjoyable and historically accurate, the gameplay mechanics and bugs hinder the narrative flow and player engagement.

    • “If you're getting into the game for the first time, I highly recommend playing the missions first [the ones with the red ribbons, such as 'Blood and Iron'].”
    • “For example, there was a mission where you play as the British against the Russians where they have twice the amount of units. It taught me that even if you are outnumbered, it does not mean you are outgunned.”
    • “It was an enjoyable mission where I wiped out a couple of units, had an organized retreat, and wiped them out.”
    • “Then there's DLCs; I don't know whose idea it is, but putting a $10 DLC to unlock the two American factions and another campaign mission just feels sleazy.”
    • “While I do appreciate the historical accuracy of the battle, I still think it's a little unfair to have a mission that you cannot possibly win.”
    • “I played the tutorial, but the first mission of the campaign seems to have completely different mechanics, and I cannot even find out any information about my units, so I don't know what any of them do.”
  • monetization
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has received significant criticism, with many players labeling it a "cash grab" due to intrusive advertisements and the presence of microtransactions in a paid title. Users express frustration over the expectation to pay additional fees for content that should be included in the initial purchase, and concerns are raised about the potential for exploitative practices as the game approaches full release. Overall, the monetization approach is viewed as detrimental to the game's reputation and player experience.

    • “When I pay a bunch of money for a game, I expect to be able to play all the content in it without having to pay more due to in-game microtransactions.”
    • “Microtransactions are solely cosmetic or unlock some other nations.”
    • “The game has a monetization system.”
    • “Large parts of the selection screens are obscured by obtrusive advertisements for the game's downloadable content.”
    • “When I pay a bunch of money for a game, I expect to be able to play all the contents in it without having to pay more due to in-game microtransactions.”
    • “The game monetization is terrible and the multiplayer lobby is broken and won't start.”
  • humor
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with players finding amusement in absurd historical depictions, quirky animations, and unexpected moments, such as a turkey representing the Ottoman Empire. However, some critiques highlight that the humor can be overshadowed by frustrating gameplay mechanics, particularly in the tutorial's lack of intuitive guidance. Overall, while there are genuinely funny elements, the execution may leave some players wanting more coherence in the comedic aspects.

    • “Surprisingly funny to see artillery guns run at each other constantly.”
    • “Someone posted a screenshot of the Ottoman Empire being represented as a turkey and I thought it was funny.”
    • “The intro is funny.”
    • “The irony in some of the depictions of nations and historical characters is often unfunny to me.”
    • “The jokes feel forced and lack the cleverness that would make them enjoyable.”
    • “Many of the attempts at humor fall flat and seem out of place within the game's context.”
  • replayability
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, players highlight the game's strong replayability due to its diverse factions, customizable options, and unique turn-based gameplay. The introduction of new AI difficulty settings and a variety of troop types further enhances the experience, although some users note that single battles can become monotonous over time. Continuous updates and improvements are seen as essential for maintaining this replay value.

    • “But the new AI difficulty settings have increased the replayability and kept me in the game for longer.”
    • “The variety of troop types and 19th century weapons makes for increasing challenges and great replayability.”
    • “Only single battles are playable, which get extremely boring after a while.”
    • “The campaigns are playable but need work to be challenging and to fix some bugs.”
    • “The factions all look, sound, feel, and play differently, providing a substantial amount of diversity and replayability.”
  • atmosphere
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is enhanced by its effective use of shadows, depth, and terrain, creating a vibrant environment despite its simplistic design. The art style and atmospheric battle sounds significantly contribute to immersion, making for an engaging experience that players appreciate. Overall, the graphics and overall atmosphere are highly praised.

    • “Similarly, adding atmospheric battle sounds helps a lot with immersion.”
    • “The art style is also great and contributes a lot to the atmosphere.”
    • “F&M has a board game atmosphere.”
    • “Even with its simplistic design, the use of shadows, depth, and terrain brings the atmosphere to life.”
  • emotional
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional aspect of the game highlights a sense of urgency and intensity, suggesting that players experience heightened feelings of tension and excitement as they navigate challenges effectively. The phrase "less time you spend touching grass" implies a desire to minimize downtime and maximize engagement, contributing to a thrilling emotional experience.

  • character development
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviewers note that the character development in this game features superior design compared to "Napoleon: Total War," suggesting a more engaging and visually appealing portrayal of characters.

    • “The character development in this game is incredibly deep and engaging, allowing players to truly connect with their characters.”
    • “I love how the characters evolve throughout the story, making each decision feel impactful and meaningful.”
    • “The variety of character arcs and personal growth paths adds a rich layer to the gameplay experience.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Fire & Maneuver

14h Median play time
48h Average play time
9-100h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 7 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Fire & Maneuver

Games Like Fire & Maneuver

Company of Heroes 3 Image
WARMACHINE: Tactics Image
Grand Tactician: The Civil War (1861-1865) Image
Battle of Empires: 1914-1918 Image
Freeman: Guerrilla Warfare Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Fire & Maneuver is a strategy game.

Fire & Maneuver is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 48 hours playing Fire & Maneuver.

Fire & Maneuver was released on April 19, 2023.

Fire & Maneuver was developed by Armchair History Interactive.

Fire & Maneuver has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its stability.

Fire & Maneuver is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Company of Heroes 3, WARMACHINE: Tactics, Grand Tactician: The Civil War (1861-1865), Battle of Empires: 1914-1918, Freeman: Guerrilla Warfare and others.