Fiends of Imprisonment

About

Fiends of Imprisonment is a single player action game. It was developed by Zonitron Productions and was released on October 19, 2015. It received negative reviews from players.

Randy's country went to war with the world's nuclear super power. Their enemies have captured a group of over 900 soldiers and are threatening to kill them all... They've put them in to a military imprisonment... a heavily guarded one... sounds familiar? The government asked Randy... They begged him... It was obvious that he was their only hope! Will you save their souls? Will you follow Randy one…

Genres & Tags

Casual

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

24%

Audience ScoreBased on 112 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

gameplay4 negative mentions

Easy to achieve 100% completion in a short amount of time.
Can be used to collect Steam trading cards.
Some players find humor in the game's poor execution.

Controls are clunky and unresponsive, making gameplay frustrating.
Graphics and overall design are of very low quality, resembling a poorly made flash game.
The game is filled with bugs and glitches, leading to a generally unenjoyable experience.

gameplay
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
46%
31%
The gameplay has been widely criticized for its lack of innovation, poor controls, and numerous bugs, leading many to describe it as frustrating and unenjoyable. While some users noted a few positive aspects, such as immersive visuals, the overall consensus is that the gameplay feels repetitive and derivative, failing to stand out in a crowded genre.
- “Awesome gameplay, nice visuals and an overall immersive world.”
- “Gameplay is a clone of absconding zatwor.”
- “Gameplay is pretty typical.”
- “The developers didn't bother to include either innovative gameplay, visuals, or story.”
- “The controls are bad, the music is bad, buggy as hell, and just bad gameplay.”
- “The controls are funky as hell, don't even think about using the keyboard, and the gameplay is repetitive.”
graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
25%
58%
The graphics of the game have been overwhelmingly criticized, with many users describing them as poorly designed, crude, and reminiscent of low-quality amateur work. Complaints include low resolution, clunky visuals, and significant technical issues like clipping through walls, leading to an overall negative impression. In stark contrast, a few users noted that the graphics were better than those in GTA V, highlighting a significant divide in opinions.
- “Awesome gameplay, nice visuals and an overall immersive world.”
- “The graphics are better than GTA V.”
- “Poorly done, badly programmed, poorly designed, the controls are horrible, the graphics are horrendous (the title screen looks like something a 10-year-old would do in 5 minutes in Macromedia Fireworks or Photoshop).”
- “The developers didn't bother to include either innovative gameplay, visuals, or story either.”
- “It might have been an interesting concept that could have been fun, but for the clunky controls, crude graphics, and overall poor design - sorry guys - this one is a thumbs down 2/10 - cheers.”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
57%
The music in the game has been widely criticized, with users describing it as annoying, poorly produced, and lacking creativity. Many reviewers feel that the soundtrack detracts from the overall experience, contributing to a sense of frustration alongside other gameplay issues. Overall, the music is considered a significant negative aspect of the game.
- “The controls are bad, the music is bad, buggy as hell, and just bad gameplay.”
- “Terrible game, the controls are really bad, the soundtrack is annoying, and the gameplay is bad overall.”
- “Controls are absolutely awful, music was probably made with a freeware product in 1 hour, and levels are boring as hell; no creativity, and those 2 hours you'll spend there are definitely not worth it.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
33%
50%
The story has been criticized for being uninteresting and poorly executed, with many reviewers noting that it fails to improve upon previous installments. The narration is described as awful, and the overall narrative experience is marred by frustrating controls and a lack of innovation.
- “The story is dumb, the narrator is awful, and the controls aren't precise.”
- “The developers didn't bother to include either innovative gameplay, visuals, or story.”
- “You should have at least improved based on the feedback from the first games, but every complaint/problem is still there, just a new 'story'.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's humor is derived from its intentional absurdity and poor execution, with users finding the subpar voice acting and overall failure to be amusing. While the game is described as "slightly hilariously" terrible, it may still offer some entertainment value, particularly for those who appreciate its comedic shortcomings.
- “The voice acting is hilarious because of how bad it is.”
- “The humor derived from its utter failure at being a serious game makes it surprisingly entertaining.”
- “It's slightly hilariously terrible, but there's potential for profit with trading cards.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's optimization has received a mixed response, with an overall performance rating of 7.5/10, indicating that while it runs relatively well, there are areas that could be improved for a smoother experience.
- “The game's optimization is impressive, allowing for smooth gameplay even on lower-end systems.”
- “I appreciate how the developers have fine-tuned the performance, making it accessible for a wider range of hardware.”
- “The optimization really shines in busy scenes, maintaining a steady frame rate without sacrificing visual quality.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with users reporting numerous bugs that severely impact gameplay and controls, leading to an overall negative experience.
- “The controls are bad, the music is bad, buggy as hell, and just bad gameplay.”
- “Too buggy.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users indicate that the zatwor games offer a level of replayability, suggesting that they remain engaging enough for multiple playthroughs.