Fat Dude Simulator
- May 20, 2019
- BiscuitGames
In Fat Dude Simulator, play as Jack, a hungry man who loves to eat, as he spends a few days in a forest with no fridge or food sources. But when a terrifying creature starts hunting him, Jack must fight for survival in this third-person indie horror game. Based on a true story, explore the forest and use whatever you can find to defend yourself against the monster.
Reviews
- The game features a humorous and zany story that some players found engaging.
- Many players appreciated the game's graphics and found it funny, providing some laughs.
- Some reviews described the game as a unique experience, with one player claiming it was a masterpiece of media.
- The game is criticized for being a walking simulator with no clear objectives or gameplay, leading to frustration.
- Numerous reviews labeled it as an asset flip, indicating a lack of originality and quality in its design.
- Players reported issues with monster spawning and overall gameplay mechanics, making it unenjoyable for many.
- story4 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The game's story is described as a captivating blend of chaos and emotion, featuring both zany elements and touching moments. Players are drawn in by its intense and vivid storytelling, which evokes strong reactions and keeps them engaged throughout. If based on true events, the narrative adds a layer of horror that enhances the overall experience.
“A wonderful game with a touching story.”
“The way the game presents you with heart-dropping action and vivid storytelling will make you come back for the thrill of a lifetime.”
“If this really is based on a true story, then my god... this is truly horrifying.”
“A riveting story that's basically about how everything's crazy, zany, and wild.”
- humor4 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is hit-or-miss; while some players find it amusing, particularly with quirky character designs, others feel it quickly becomes repetitive and lacks substance. Overall, opinions are divided, with some finding it entertaining and others deeming it poorly executed.
“Made me laugh quite a bit though.”
“Pretty funny but a bit boring after 5 minutes due to not much to do, although it has nice graphics.”
“Although it's very humorous to see a fat dude in the elements for some unknown reason.”
- graphics3 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- -100 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The graphics are praised for their quality and visual appeal, contributing to an enjoyable experience, though some users find the lack of objectives and gameplay depth leads to boredom after a short time. Overall, the visuals are a highlight, but they may not be enough to sustain long-term engagement.
“The audio, the visuals, the gameplay, and the characters are all impressive.”
“The graphics are great, making it amazing for a good laugh.”
“The graphics are nice, adding to the overall experience.”
“The graphics look outdated and lack detail, making the game feel less immersive.”
“Character models are poorly designed and animations are stiff, which detracts from the overall experience.”
“The environments are bland and repetitive, failing to create a visually engaging world.”
- gameplay2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Users praise the gameplay for being excellent and well-integrated with the plot, highlighting it as a key aspect of their positive experience.
“The audio, the visuals, the gameplay, and the characters are all top-notch.”
“Exactly what I was looking for: excellent gameplay and plot.”
- emotional2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Players find the game emotionally impactful, highlighting its touching story and powerful dialogue that evokes strong feelings, often leading to tears.
“The dialogue made me cry.”
“A wonderful game with a touching story.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy has been criticized for being exploitative, with accusations of plagiarism due to a lack of credit for original artists and developers, leading to perceptions of the game as a cash grab.
“The developers didn't credit any of the artists and real game developers who created the assets, which feels like plagiarism and a cash grab.”
“The monetization strategy is overly aggressive, making it difficult to enjoy the game without spending money.”
“It feels like the game is designed to push players towards microtransactions rather than providing a fair gaming experience.”