Skip to main content

eFootball

eFootball Game Cover
48%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
optimization, stability
48% User Score Based on 27,188 reviews

Platforms

Xbox Series X|SPCTabletAndroidPlaystation 5PhonePlaystation 4Xbox OneXboxMobile PlatformWindowsPlayStation
eFootball Game Cover

About

eFootball is a single player and multiplayer sport game. It was developed by KONAMI and was released on September 29, 2021. It received neutral reviews from players.

Play eFootball™ with users around the world!

Skip User Reviews

48%
Audience ScoreBased on 27,188 reviews
gameplay668 positive mentions
optimization92 negative mentions

  • Gameplay is praised for realistic, tactical, and smooth mechanics offering a grounded alternative to arcade-style football games.
  • Graphics feature next-gen worthy visuals with detailed player models, improved lighting, and realistic animations enhancing the football atmosphere.
  • The game offers decent replayability with a diverse range of teams and online modes, supported by ongoing updates improving playability.
  • Gameplay suffers from sluggish, unresponsive controls, inconsistent AI, numerous bugs, and problematic online lag disrupting the experience.
  • The game lacks a coherent story or master league mode, providing limited single-player content and repetitive objectives.
  • Heavy monetization with pay-to-win elements, excessive grinding, and intrusive microtransactions detract from fair competition and enjoyment.
  • gameplay
    2,932 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay in this football simulator is highly divisive, with many praising its realistic, tactical, and smoother mechanics reminiscent of older PES titles, offering a more grounded alternative to FIFA’s arcade style. However, numerous players criticize it for being sluggish, clunky, often unresponsive, and plagued by bugs, with inconsistent AI behavior, scripted moments, and problematic online lag detracting from the experience. While improvements have been made since launch, the lack of game modes, pay-to-win elements, and ongoing technical issues maintain frustration among fans who feel the game has regressed compared to previous PES iterations.

    • “The graphics are next-gen worthy, the mechanics are borderline flawless, and after 25 hours, I’m still discovering new layers of depth.”
    • “The gameplay is so smooth and realistic (something that FIFA lacks a lot).”
    • “Efootball isn’t just an alternative to FIFA — it’s arguably a better football simulator for those who value realism, smooth gameplay, and tactical depth.”
    • “The lowest game I have ever seen, the gameplay is pre-anticipated, you cannot move your players straight to the ball, even through passes if you use minimum or maximum power it's the same, you cannot control the direction... a total disaster.”
    • “Gameplay is absolute ass mechanically (everything feels wrong: the passing, the shooting, even just running around) and the fut-like format sucks (the fact that you have to upgrade your players doesn't help it).”
    • “The gameplay is absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥: players move like they’re skating on soap, passes go anywhere but where you aim, and shooting feels like kicking a balloon.”
  • graphics
    1,515 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews of this game's graphics are highly mixed, with many users criticizing its outdated, low-resolution, and mobile-like visuals that are often considered a downgrade from previous titles like PES 2021. While some praise improvements over earlier versions and find the player models and animations decent or even impressive for a free game, a significant portion points out poor optimization, lack of graphical detail, and jarring visual glitches that detract from the experience. Overall, the graphics are seen as subpar compared to competitors, needing further refinement and enhanced visual fidelity to meet modern standards.

    • “The graphics and animations add a nice layer of realism, and the different modes give you plenty to do — whether you just want quick matches or a full career grind.”
    • “The graphics are next-gen worthy, the mechanics are borderline flawless, and after 25 hours, I’m still discovering new layers of depth.”
    • “The graphics: nets have improved physics and rendering, the turf looks much better, lighting is improved, player hairs look great, facial expressions way less uncanny (dare I say, good), overall graphics seem sharper and make efootball the best looking football game I've played.”
    • “The graphics were awful (at least on the console/PC), you couldn't even think that's "a newer game" than PES 21.”
    • “Graphically, the game took a time machine — backward.”
    • “The graphics are sub-standard and horribly optimised.”
  • optimization
    216 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Optimization for this game is widely criticized, with frequent reports of poor performance, stuttering, lag, and unstable frame rates even on mid to high-end systems, particularly affecting online play and laptops. While some users note occasional smooth gameplay and good optimization, the majority highlight severe issues such as inconsistent player movement, server lag, and lack of optimization for various hardware, indicating a need for significant performance improvements and better resource management. Overall, optimization problems substantially hinder the gaming experience.

    • “The game runs smoothly and performance is stable, which helps a lot.”
    • “This game has good optimization, it can run on any potato out there.”
    • “It is able to run smoothly on low end PCs at 60fps (capped) during gameplay and 30fps during cutscenes.”
    • “What used to be a promising football game is now a mess full of bugs and poor optimization.”
    • “So badly optimized for AMD, it doesn't let you play even though your VRAM is within the approved/recommended range.”
    • “You're gonna lag 9 games out of 10 even if you have NASA connection and just have to face that the game basically plays at 5 FPS; it's stuttering so much and you're constantly 1 second behind while your opponent seems completely unaffected, plus the controls won't respond and you're just gonna have to watch your team get destroyed because you're basically AFK at this point.”
  • stability
    197 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game suffers from widespread stability issues, including frequent bugs, glitches, freezes, and crashes that significantly hinder gameplay and frustrate users. Despite some improvements over time, many players report persistent problems with AI behavior, lag, unresponsive controls, and graphical inconsistencies. Overall, the game is considered unstable and incomplete at launch, with ongoing concerns about patch effectiveness and optimization.

    • “Surprisingly fun and runs great on the Deck!”
    • “Not buggy (but as good as I expect a football game to be)”
    • “The game is riddled with bugs, glitches, and server issues, making it almost unplayable at times.”
    • “It was a buggy mess on release, and however many updates Konami release, this game seems beyond repair for me, and for most other players, who have deservedly contributed to the overwhelmingly negative rating.”
    • “Just an awful product so far, the entire game (if you can even call it that) is buggy as hell, the passes are either too weak or too strong with no middle ground, players don’t run to recover the ball after missed passes, defending is abysmal with no pressure on the ball, and fouls are often wrongly called.”
  • monetization
    140 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Monetization in this football game is overwhelmingly criticized as a heavy-handed cash grab, dominated by pervasive microtransactions, loot boxes, and pay-to-win mechanics that undermine fair competition and gameplay enjoyment. While the game is free-to-play and allows building a decent team without spending, many players feel the focus on monetization detracts significantly from the core football experience, making it feel more like a gambling simulator than a sports title.

    • “Though the game includes pay-to-win elements and microtransactions, free players can still access the gacha system and have a chance to obtain good and great players without paying.”
    • “Monetization is quite liberal; the game gives you lots of great players for free, and you don't actually need to pay for anything. It's easy to build a squad of 90+ rated players.”
    • “Although it has a good amount of loot boxes and microtransactions, the game itself is free and worth a try.”
    • “The gameplay had potential, but it’s completely wasted on an ultimate-team style cash grab.”
    • “Meanwhile, instead of fixing the core gameplay, Konami keeps pushing packs and monetization.”
    • “This is nothing but a free to play pay to win cash grab, basically a gambling simulator.”
  • humor
    116 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in this game is largely unintentional, stemming from frequent glitches, broken AI, and bizarre gameplay mechanics that lead to hilariously bad and frustrating moments. Many players find it funny when playing with friends due to its absurd errors, while others see it as a source of disappointment masked by comedic failure. Overall, the humor arises from the game's flaws rather than deliberate comedy, creating a mixed experience of laughter and frustration.

    • “Honestly, this game is like the virtual equivalent of a soccer match where the referee has been replaced with a house cat—unexpected, chaotic, and full of hilarious moments.”
    • “Plus, the game has a delightful sense of humor that keeps you chuckling, especially when your teammate scores an own goal and your virtual coach turns into an angry meme right before your eyes!”
    • “The player AI is hilariously broken; at one point I set off on my own down the wing, was closed down by four opposition players and had nobody to pass to because all my own players were standing in their own half making hilarious faces at each other.”
    • “It is hard to make a game that's worse than catching an STD but here you have it: this is just a simulation of football if it was played by people with Parkinson's disease, and it's not funny, it's depressing.”
    • “It's a laggy game, not enjoyable and pay-to-win system. Not funny, not recommended.”
    • “It is hard to make a game that's worse than catching an STD but here you have it: this is just a simulation of football if it was played by people with Parkinson's disease, especially those who use scripts whenever they are bad at the game and disconnect from the session. It's not funny, it's depressing.”
  • story
    73 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game largely lacks a coherent or engaging story mode, with most users highlighting the absence of depth, narrative content, or a master league comparable to other football titles. While some mention the presence of missions or objectives, these are seen as repetitive and insufficient to compensate for the missing story elements. Overall, the story aspect is generally criticized or dismissed, with a few exceptions noting brief or minimal narrative attempts.

    • “Player stats are just cosmetics in this 'football' game, it's all about the story plot.”
    • “The graphics used in the story scenes in between gameplay are so perfectly done.”
    • “'Galactic Odyssey' offers a vast open world to explore, side quests to complete, and multiple branching story paths.”
    • “Best football game right now but there is no story mode or the master league.”
    • “There is nothing to keep you playing it is only dream team and exhibition games no story mode and no fun.”
    • “Overall the story is terrible and the lack of a more detailed lore is making this game very hard for me to enjoy not to mention the total lack of gameplay.”
  • music
    71 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music received mixed feedback, with some users praising the soundtrack as a standout feature and calling it great or even sublime, while others criticized it as repetitive, annoying, or terrible. Overall, the soundtrack is often described as decent to good but limited in variety, with occasional complaints about menu music and lack of better audio options.

    • “If anything really stands out, it is quite good music, audio and the atmosphere all in all.”
    • “Nominated this game for best soundtrack.”
    • “The commentary is lively and informative, and the music is catchy and upbeat.”
    • “The soundtrack is also terrible, had to turn music off completely.”
    • “The music aside from a few tracks is bombastic and annoying.”
    • “The menu music sounds like someone doing an Ariana Grande impersonation and it gets old after about 5 minutes.”
  • grinding
    52 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding in the game is widely considered excessive and time-consuming, often feeling like a chore with low rewards and heavy reliance on luck or monetary spending. While some players find it motivating or manageable, many criticize the grind as discouraging, especially given the advantage paid players have and the random nature of player upgrades. Overall, the grind detracts from the enjoyment for those seeking a balanced or casual experience.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “A bit grindy... sometimes.”
    • “Man, it's a disgrace from Konami to put this build in a game with no grinding to do until November.”
    • “Man, I just want to play single player master league/career mode instead of grinding in PvP events pointlessly with people who have bought a decent chunk of paid players.”
    • “The rewards you get by opening packs through grinding the game are a joke... everybody since division 5/6 has a stacked team with boosts and 100+ overall.”
    • “Position training and player skill training are randomized and not selectable by the player and can result in nothing after all your hours grinding them; this is deflating as you actually have wasted your time.”
  • emotional
    32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional responses to the game are deeply polarized, with some players feeling nostalgic and impressed by moments of gameplay and scoring, while the majority express frustration, heartbreak, and regret due to poor mechanics, lag, unrealistic AI, and disappointing controls. Many describe the experience as emotionally painful and a betrayal of past beloved football titles, causing genuine emotional distress and disillusionment.

    • “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized exactly what was at stake.”
    • “The orchestral score enhances the emotional impact of key story moments and adds a layer of grandeur to epic space battles.”
    • “It's a heartwarming nod to the past that evokes nostalgia and sparks fond memories.”
  • atmosphere
    29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere in the game receives mixed feedback, with praise for immersive lighting, detailed stadiums, and authentic pre/post-match presentation, yet criticism targets the crowd animation, audio quality, and overall stadium vibe as lacking or unrealistic. Many players reminisce about the "old" atmosphere from previous editions, expressing a desire for Konami to restore that classic feel. While the game shows improvements in graphics and some atmospheric elements, it still falls short in creating a consistently engaging and lively football environment.

    • “The stadiums look stunning, the player models are detailed, and the crowd atmosphere adds to the excitement.”
    • “The pre and post match atmosphere is really good!”
    • “Through colorful menus and a completely authentic atmosphere you will dive into the efootball world!”
    • “I wish Konami gave us a more polished standard PES with smoother animations, better atmosphere, neat effects on grass, etc. Definitely not this.”
    • “Stadium atmosphere: 3/10 – the fans look like bots.”
    • “Even the atmosphere inside the stadium sounds more like a funeral; the fans seem to be equally excited.”
  • replayability
    28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Replayability has notably improved from the game's initial release, with ongoing updates enhancing playability and enjoyment, especially online. However, limitations such as restricted team selections and limited modes hinder long-term engagement, though the diversity of teams and settings offers some replay value. Overall, while not perfect, the game provides decent to infinite replayability, particularly considering it is free.

    • “There is limitless replayability with the diversity of teams and settings available, whether you play alone or with friends online.”
    • “This would increase replayability and give more flexibility to players.”
    • “Limiting us to one team for this period really kills replayability straight off the bat.”
    • “The game would also be much more playable with league or standard tournament formats being available all-year round and not in lottery-like rotations.”
    • “ Replayability: limited modes reduce long-term engagement.”
  • character development
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development received criticism for poor design quality, but this flaw was noted as minor since players rarely focus on character visuals during gameplay.

Skip Game Offers

Buy eFootball

63h Median play time
375h Average play time
4h Main story
4h Completionist
7-500h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 41 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like eFootball
Skip Game News
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

eFootball is a sport game.

eFootball is available on Xbox Series X|S, PC, PlayStation 5, Phone and others.

The main story can be completed in around 4 hours, while the entire game is estimated to take about 4 hours to finish. On average players spend around 375 hours playing eFootball.

eFootball was released on September 29, 2021.

eFootball was developed by KONAMI.

eFootball has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its optimization.

eFootball is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Dream League Soccer 2025, EA SPORTS FC™ Mobile Soccer, Football League 2024, Total Football - Soccer Game, Score! Match - PvP Soccer and others.