DRAKERZ-Confrontation

About

Most other TCG play either with "virtual" cards or with "real" cards ( paper ). With DRAKERZ-Confrontation, you will enjoy the best of both gaming experiences in playing with your "real" premium cards , you will experience new sensations , halfway between the board game and tactical game cards. The calculation points and the cost of cards, entirely managed by the computer allows you to stay focuse…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

47%

Audience ScoreBased on 133 reviews

gameplay7 positive mentions

monetization3 negative mentions

The game features a unique concept that combines augmented reality with trading card gameplay, allowing for a fresh experience in the genre.
The artwork and graphics are praised for their quality, contributing to an engaging visual experience.
The gameplay mechanics encourage strategic positioning and decision-making, making battles more dynamic and interesting.

The game is heavily criticized for its pay-to-win model, where players must spend money to access better cards and features, limiting the experience for free players.
Many users report technical issues, including problems with the launcher, bugs, and difficulty in creating accounts, which hinder the overall gameplay experience.
The game has been described as lacking in content and community engagement, with many players finding it difficult to find matches or feeling that the game is essentially dead.

gameplay
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
39%
44%
17%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating its unique mechanics and strategic depth, particularly in positioning and card interactions. However, many criticize it for being slow-paced, repetitive, and unbalanced, with a reliance on luck and insufficient explanations of mechanics. Additionally, technical issues and monetization practices have detracted from the overall experience for some users.
- “The gameplay is interesting and different enough, though there is a large element of luck as with most CCGs.”
- “I'm extremely impressed by the artwork, gameplay mechanics, and the augmentation.”
- “Now gameplay is really amazing strategy-wise; it does not only matter with the cards, but how you will position your drako too.”
- “The gameplay is made extra slow by attack animations that get longer rather than more intense when you do more damage, and a focus on nudging your character's card until it's exactly in the perfect position.”
- “The mechanics just seem too simple and seem to be entirely without variety.”
- “A lot of mechanics aren't explained properly too.”
graphics
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
13%
20%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many praising the high-quality artwork and visual design as "top notch" and "amazing." However, some players feel that despite the appealing visuals, the overall gameplay experience is lacking, leading to disappointment. While the graphics stand out positively, they are not enough to compensate for other gameplay issues, leaving some players feeling unfulfilled.
- “I'm extremely impressed by the artwork, gameplay mechanics, and the augmentation.”
- “I haven't received my physical cards yet, but from what I've seen and heard, the artwork has been done very beautifully.”
- “Great graphical appearance.”
- “The game has pretty graphics, but at least for me, the pretty models and UI were not enough for me to keep playing.”
- “I think I'll give this game a try when it's translated properly. Fix your launcher and have a proper translation/speed for English-speaking countries. The artwork, however, looks pretty nice, though sadly unplayable.”
- “Graphics: 5 of 10”
story
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
60%
20%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for being heavily tied to a pay-to-win model, where players must purchase premium content to access the full storyline and unlock additional cards. While the initial story missions provide some free cards, the limited availability and reliance on randomization can lead to imbalanced gameplay, making progress difficult without spending real money. Overall, the narrative experience is seen as constrained and frustrating due to these monetization strategies.
- “The playable story parts give you cards when winning, 1 for each completion, and actually only like 10 free, but it's a good start.”
- “The game is free to play and you can get many virtual cards with the story mode.”
- “Doing the story missions (which I did to get every unlock possible in the demo) was somewhat okay.”
- “Can't get the full storyline without the premium version.”
- “Yes, you may have to pay if you want to unlock the full story mode (doesn't interest me) or have cards a bit faster, and I agree with people complaining about that; it's a kind of shady part.”
- “In order to get other creatures and other cards, you have to buy the packs; otherwise, you won't get very far in the story mode or when versing other people online.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The game's stability is inconsistent, with reports of bugs, crashes, and translation issues affecting the user experience. While some players have experienced smooth gameplay without glitches, others have encountered significant errors that detract from the overall enjoyment.
- “I downloaded the game, switched the language to English, and created an account without any problems. I played for about an hour with no glitches.”
- “The game runs smoothly on my device, and I haven't encountered any crashes or bugs during my gameplay.”
- “I appreciate how stable the game is; it loads quickly and maintains a consistent frame rate throughout.”
- “However, the game is poorly translated from French, is kind of buggy under its clean interface, and the card text isn't easy to read at higher resolutions.”
- “- Buggy client (my game crashed after I lost a match) >_>”
- “So many errors, bugs, glitches...”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game is heavily criticized for its reliance on pervasive microtransactions and ads, detracting from the overall experience. Players feel that the game is not as enjoyable as advertised, and the amateur coding further exacerbates the frustration with its monetization approach.
- “Boring basic card game with microtransactions, ads everywhere, and incredibly amateur coding.”
- “Not really as fun as its advertisement.”
- “Once you have done all this stuff, republish the game with the advertising you decide; in this way, you will get things that give you profits, and players will spend.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game has received positive feedback for its quality, particularly the menu theme, which remains enjoyable even after extended listening. However, some users noted that the overall sound and music content is limited.
- “Now that I've listened to the music in the menu for so long, I just want to say that it holds up; it hasn't gotten annoying yet. Give that producer a raise!”
- “- not much sounds/music”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
200%
300%
Players indicate that grinding in the game can be quite demanding, often requiring significant time investment or additional lives to progress effectively.
- “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
- “The grind is satisfying and offers a real sense of progression.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
- “I spent hours grinding, and it felt like I made no progress.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the humor in the game to be effective and enjoyable, contributing positively to the overall experience.