Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon

About

Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon is a single player action game with a horror theme. It was developed by Microids and was released on April 17, 2014. It received mostly positive reviews from critics and negative reviews from players.

In Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon, players assume the role of a priest-detective investigating a series of strange occurrences in a small Romanian village. The game combines elements of adventure and puzzle-solving with a deep, philosophical narrative that explores themes of faith, morality, and the nature of good and evil. Players will uncover dark secrets, confront supernatural creatures, and ultimately face off against the legendary Count Dracula himself.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon screenshot

Skip User Reviews

34%

Audience ScoreBased on 100 reviews

story13 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game features improved graphics and visual effects compared to the previous titles in the series.
The storyline is interesting and thrilling, providing a different narrative experience within the Dracula series.
Some players found the game enjoyable despite its limitations, appreciating the atmosphere and character development.

This version is heavily watered down from the original, with 95% of the puzzles removed, making it almost unplayable without a walkthrough.
Many critical in-game items and animations are missing, leading to confusion and frustration during gameplay.
The game has been criticized for its misleading marketing, as it does not represent the full experience of the original PC version.

story
39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
59%
8%
The story in the third game of the Dracula series is described as short yet intriguing, with a shift from romantic adventure to supernatural investigation, which some players found refreshing. However, many reviewers criticized the narrative for being convoluted, filled with plot holes, and lacking coherence due to significant cuts in content, leading to confusion and frustration. While some appreciated the improvements in voice acting and visual effects, the overall execution left many feeling disappointed compared to the earlier installments.
- “At its core, a pretty good game and a notable improvement over the previous two games in every way, especially the story and the voice overs which manage to keep things serious this time, even if not every actor hits the right tone.”
- “This shift from a romantic and adventure story in the first two games to an investigation of the supernatural seemed to be a good change for the series.”
- “It has a pretty decent story, much more interesting and twisty than the one in 'Dracula Origins' that I recently played, which flowed like a charm.”
- “The already hokey and convoluted story is reduced to bizarre time shifts and plot holes galore.”
- “I first started with a lot of hype, but by the middle of the game, I was already burnt out. The game was heavily cut, I was lost so many times, confused, and the story didn't make sense. The original game was way better; I'm sad because I liked the first two, which were already shortened. What a shame...”
- “First of all, it is not the full version -- parts of the story as well as the character animations are missing.”
graphics
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
37%
47%
16%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with some praising the visual upgrades that maintain the retro aesthetic, while others criticize the mobile port for being glitchy and less impressive than the original. Overall, the third installment is noted as the best in the trilogy in terms of graphics and playability, despite some players feeling that the improvements are not enough to satisfy those accustomed to modern visuals. Retro gamers appreciate the challenge over graphics, but the game's visual quality has still garnered a score of 7 from some reviewers.
- “Then, I saw there was a third that was released in better times with much better graphics... and holy crap did it blow!”
- “Though this is also a bit circumcised version of the original game, this is the best game in the trilogy in terms of graphics and playability.”
- “[puzzles hurt so good, gorgeous 3D artwork, engaging storyline]”
- “Well for me this version was even more glitchy, the graphics would stop while the voice parts would continue.”
- “At first, playing the first and second games, I was skeptical because of the graphics.”
- “Improved graphics to the previous 2 games in the series but after almost 5 hours, playing the game by referring to a walkthrough every 2 seconds that makes no sense because this version is watered down, I have no idea what this was about other than vampires.”
gameplay
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
58%
25%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it difficult to adapt due to changes that have made puzzles more confusing and mechanics less intuitive. While the game boasts beautiful visuals, the removal of key features and unclear event triggers have led to frustrations, often requiring players to rely on walkthroughs. Overall, the gameplay experience is described as cumbersome and less engaging compared to the original version.
- “The game is beautiful despite an old gameplay that can be a little difficult at the beginning.”
- “Gameplay: 9”
- “While this streamlines the gameplay, most puzzles end up even more obtuse than before.”
- “Menus like inventory and whole mechanics are removed and/or changed.”
- “Reiterating that this isn't the original version of the game - it's been watered down and rendered pretty much unplayable without following a walkthrough, as the gameplay is jumbled and event triggers are unclear.”
atmosphere
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere of the game has received mixed reviews; some players appreciate its uniqueness, while others feel it lacks the charm of the original. Critiques highlight low-resolution character models and repetitive sound design, which detracts from the overall experience. Despite decent backgrounds and good voice performances, the sound quality and lack of immersive elements leave much to be desired.
- “I honestly found it different and I liked the atmosphere.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game is described as repetitive and lacking in quality, with a short atmospheric loop that fails to enhance the experience. While voice performances are noted as decent, they suffer from poor sound quality, contributing to an overall underwhelming audio experience.
- “The gameplay was a real pain to get used to and not get dizzy, the backgrounds were pretty decent but the characters were extremely low-res with no lip movement. Voice performances were pretty good, but they lacked sound quality and the sound was like a 5-second atmospheric music that looped again and again.”
- “(The archaeologist talks like he's having trouble getting his Siri to play his house cleaning music list. The others are fine enough.) Since so much has been deleted from the game, it's somewhat short, but better than overstaying its welcome.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect tedious due to the removal of puzzles, which allows them to retain nearly all items they collect, leading to an overwhelming accumulation of unnecessary items. This design choice detracts from the overall experience by making inventory management feel burdensome.
- “Since the puzzle removal allows you to keep mostly everything you pick up, this becomes tedious, as many items that should have been removed previously remain.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's optimization has been criticized for its low-resolution character models and lack of lip movement, which detracts from the overall experience. While the backgrounds are decent and voice performances are commendable, the sound quality is poor, featuring repetitive atmospheric music that fails to enhance gameplay. Additionally, players have reported difficulties in adjusting to the gameplay mechanics, leading to discomfort.

Skip Critic Reviews

80%Critics’ scoreBased on 1 critic reviews

Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon review
Gamesradar.com
80%

Skip Game Offers

Buy Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon

47%266reviews

Dracula: Resurrection

2014

Action

22%94reviews

Dracula 2: The Last Sanctuary

2014

Casual Puzzle

50%1.9kreviews

Syberia 3

2017

Casual Puzzle

+13

85%1.1kreviews

Syberia II

2011

Puzzle

+15

28%128reviews

Necronomicon: The Gateway to Beyond

2014

Casual Puzzle

More games like Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon is a action game with horror theme.

Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon is available on PC, Mac OS and Windows.

Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon was released on April 17, 2014.

Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon was developed by Microids.

Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon has received mostly positive reviews from players and mostly positive reviews from critics. Most players liked this game for its story but disliked it for its gameplay.

Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon is a single player game.

Similar games include Dracula: Resurrection, Dracula 2: The Last Sanctuary, Syberia 3, Syberia II, Necronomicon: The Gateway to Beyond and others.

Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon

Platforms