Skip to main content

DogFighter

This fast paced, arcade flight combat game created by Dark Water Studios hopes to encroach on already-firmly held territory- but will it succeed?
DogFighter Game Cover
58%Game Brain Score
music, humor
graphics, gameplay
60% User Score Based on 289 reviews
Critic Score 50%Based on 1 reviews

Platforms

PCWindows
DogFighter Game Cover

About

DogFighter is a single player and multiplayer arcade simulation game. It was developed by Dark Water Studios Ltd and was released on June 14, 2010. It received neutral reviews from both critics and players.

"DogFighter is an arcade-style aerial combat game with support for up to 16 players in multiplayer modes, including Deathmatch, Team Deathmatch, and Capture the Flag. It also features a co-op mode called Wolf Pack. Players can choose from 8 unique biplanes and over 20 weapons, with easy-to-use flight controls for advanced maneuvers. The game boasts beautiful environments and several advanced server options for varied gameplay."

Skip User Reviews

60%
Audience ScoreBased on 289 reviews
music7 positive mentions
graphics8 negative mentions

  • The game offers a fun arcade-style dogfighting experience, especially enjoyable with friends.
  • It's easy to pick up and play, making it accessible for casual gamers.
  • The graphics and overall presentation, while dated, still hold some charm and can provide a few hours of entertainment.
  • The multiplayer community is virtually non-existent, making it difficult to find matches against real players.
  • Controls are often described as clunky and unresponsive, leading to a frustrating gameplay experience.
  • The game lacks depth and variety, with repetitive gameplay and limited maps that can quickly become boring.
  • graphics
    27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews for the game's graphics are highly polarized, with some praising them as "next-gen" and visually impressive, while others criticize them as outdated and poorly optimized. Many users note that the graphics feel dated, reminiscent of earlier gaming eras, and are accompanied by issues like jerky animations and blocky shadows. Overall, while there are some positive remarks about the visuals, the consensus leans towards disappointment, particularly in relation to the game's overall experience.

    • “The graphics are next gen, even next century man.”
    • “It has the best graphics, it's true honestly 10/10.”
    • “The only place where this game shines is in the graphics department.”
    • “Bad graphics, boring music, and rather lazy even for 2010.”
    • “Graphics are very dated, gameplay is slow, and you can only play solo because multiplayer is dead.”
    • “Floaty controls, boring gameplay, graphics that belong in 2004 and a soundtrack that consists of maybe 4 rock loops.”
  • music
    22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players finding it catchy and enjoyable at first, particularly praising the soundtrack's rock elements. However, many users criticize it for becoming repetitive and generic, leading to frustration over its limited variety and overall blandness. While a few appreciate the intensity of the metal tracks, the consensus leans towards the music being a significant drawback due to its lack of depth and repetitiveness.

    • “Already when you start the game you get blasted with classic rock music.”
    • “Soundtrack - absolutely on point.”
    • “Great music, don't know the band's name but it's amazing 10/10.”
    • “Bad graphics, boring music, and rather lazy even for 2010.”
    • “While that's the number 1 thing that annoys me, the soundtrack, consisting of only a couple of incredibly generic rock tracks, drove me insane.”
    • “Floaty controls, boring gameplay, graphics that belong in 2004, and a soundtrack that consists of maybe 4 rock loops.”
  • gameplay
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing the weak arcade flying mechanics, floaty controls, and repetitive gameplay that lacks depth. While some appreciate the variety of game modes and the simplicity that makes it accessible for casual players, others find the experience dull and unengaging, particularly due to dated graphics and a lack of multiplayer activity. Overall, the game offers a basic flying experience that may appeal to those seeking a straightforward approach, but it fails to deliver a compelling or immersive gameplay experience.

    • “The game offers some different game modes, but they don't really change the core gameplay which is to fly your plane, shoot other planes, and don't get shot down.”
    • “If you really enjoy airplanes but you don't feel comfortable with the complex gameplay of flight simulators, this game was made for you.”
    • “Easy to get into, simple flight model, and gameplay aspects that encourage you to take advantage of the simplistic model and fly like you're in a Hollywood flick about air pirates in the early 20th century.”
    • “Weak arcade flying mechanics, wonky controls, and a death match-based game mode with no players.”
    • “Floaty controls, boring gameplay, graphics that belong in 2004, and a soundtrack that consists of maybe 4 rock loops.”
    • “Did not like the horrible controls, did not like the repetitive gameplay, did not like the game mechanics.”
  • story
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is largely criticized, with users noting a lack of depth and a repetitive structure in single-player missions, leading to a low rating of 1/10. While some appreciate the effort put into the narrative, particularly its basis on a true story about Michael Vick, many feel it lacks a substantial campaign and is overshadowed by the gameplay mechanics. Overall, players should not expect a compelling story experience.

    • “Game mechanics are great and the storyline is okay.”
    • “It could have had a more in-depth and longer storyline, but for its budget, they definitely deserve a thumbs up for the effort.”
    • “This is based on a true story about Michael Vick.”
    • “Story: 1/10”
    • “Single player is a bunch of identical, repetitive missions with increasing difficulty.”
    • “No story mode as far as I can tell; only 'arena style' deathmatch dogfighting variations, which includes a number of singleplayer tournaments.”
  • optimization
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization is inconsistent, with some users reporting smooth performance on lower-end hardware, while others criticize it for being poorly optimized despite minimal visual demands. Many players experience issues with controls and overall performance, indicating a need for further optimization and simplification for better compatibility with slower PCs.

    • “The game is optimized and can run on most modern hardware; Intel HD 4000 gives me about 60 FPS all the time at 1600x900 @ 60Hz.”
    • “This game needs simplification and should also be optimized for slower PCs.”
    • “Getting the game to look and run smoothly is a real pain.”
    • “Poorly optimized despite not having much in visuals.”
    • “This game needs simplification and also should be optimized for slower PCs.”
    • “Dodgy controls, poorly optimized code.”
  • humor
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is generally considered funny, with users appreciating its humor, though some express frustration with the controls, which can be cumbersome and limit the experience. The joystick support is particularly criticized, although players using an Xbox 360 controller seem to have a better experience.

    • “This game is hilarious and keeps me laughing throughout!”
    • “The humor in this game is top-notch; it never fails to make me smile.”
    • “The quirky controls add to the humor, making every gameplay session a fun experience.”
  • replayability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's replayability is rated low, with a score of 3 out of 10, indicating that players find limited incentive to revisit the game after completing it.

    • “The replay value is only 3 out of 10.”
    • “I found the game lacks any real incentive to play again.”
    • “Once you finish the game, there's little reason to return.”
  • grinding
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be slow and tedious, particularly due to cumbersome menu choices that hinder the overall experience.

    • “The way they work makes menu choices slow and tedious.”
    • “Grinding feels like a never-ending chore rather than an enjoyable part of the game.”
    • “The repetitive nature of grinding takes away from the overall experience and makes it feel like a slog.”
  • stability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users report that the online experience is plagued by bugs, leading to a lack of stability and minimal social interaction.

    • “I tried online, but it was quite buggy and there was zero social interaction.”
    • “The game crashes frequently, making it nearly unplayable.”
    • “I experienced constant lag and disconnections, which ruined the overall experience.”
Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy DogFighter

1h Median play time
1h Average play time
1-1h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like DogFighter

Games Like DogFighter

Strike Vector Image
Air Brawl Image
SkyDrift Image
Star Wars Squadrons Image
Dogfight 1942 Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

DogFighter is a arcade simulation game.

DogFighter is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 1 hours playing DogFighter.

DogFighter was released on June 14, 2010.

DogFighter was developed by Dark Water Studios Ltd.

DogFighter has received neutral reviews from both players and critics. Most players liked this game for its music but disliked it for its graphics.

DogFighter is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Strike Vector, Air Brawl, SkyDrift, Star Wars Squadrons, Dogfight 1942 and others.