Dimensity

About

Dimensity is a single player and multiplayer role playing game. It was developed by Dagger Games and was released on July 21, 2010. It received negative reviews from players.

"Dimensity is a single-player and multi-player Role Playing Game set in a 3D fantasy world torn by war. Choose a leader from four races, each with two classes, and embark on a mission to defend the crown or fight for freedom. With an immersive storyline, intense action, and numerous enemies to battle, Dimensity offers a rich and unique gaming experience."

Genres & Tags

Role Playing

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

21%

Audience ScoreBased on 28 reviews

graphics4 negative mentions

The game has a decent storyline that some players found enjoyable.
It can be amusing for a short period, especially for fans of the genre.
Some players appreciate the attempt at a Diablo-style gameplay experience.

The game is plagued by numerous glitches, crashes, and a clunky interface.
Gameplay is often described as tedious, boring, and unpolished, with poor execution overall.
Voice acting and graphics are considered subpar, contributing to a lackluster experience.

graphics
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
30%
40%
The graphics of the game are generally considered dated and unpolished, with comparisons made to earlier titles like Warcraft and Diablo. While some players find the visuals acceptable, they feel that the overall execution detracts from the potential enjoyment of the game. The consensus suggests that improvements in graphics could significantly enhance the gaming experience.
- “Diablo-type play with wow graphics.”
- “The graphics are stunning and really enhance the overall experience.”
- “The visual design is breathtaking, making every moment in the game a feast for the eyes.”
- “You can tell this would have been a potentially fun game, but it's ruined with unpolished mechanics, graphics, and everything, giving the ultimate feeling that it feels like Warcraft 0.5.”
- “Not a bad game, but the graphics are a bit dated.”
- “Graphics - 3/5.”
gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
37%
38%
The gameplay has been widely criticized for being unpolished and lacking depth, with many reviewers feeling it detracts significantly from the overall experience. Despite potential, the mechanics and execution are described as subpar, leading to a frustrating and unsatisfying gaming experience. Overall, it has received low ratings, with some likening it to an inferior version of established titles like Warcraft.
- “Once you get it somewhat working, you realize it was a waste of time because the gameplay is trash too.”
- “You can tell this would have been a potentially fun game, but it's ruined with unpolished mechanics, graphics, and everything, giving the ultimate feeling that it feels like Warcraft 0.5.”
- “Gameplay - 2/5”
story
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The story is described as a decent but generic narrative reminiscent of classic Warcraft scenarios, featuring a conflict between orcs and humans and a knight undertaking quests for a king. While the execution may feel dated, the storyline provides a familiar fantasy experience, albeit lacking in originality.
- “Not a bad game; the graphics are a bit dated, but it has a decent storyline.”
- “You know those Warcraft 3 scenarios where you controlled the Minotaur King and did mini quests and explored around?”
- “The story seemed rather generic, with a Warcraft clone style featuring orcs (firbolgs) and humans at war, playing a knight doing errands for the king.”
- “Story seemed rather generic, Warcraft clone style thing with orcs (firbolgs) and humans being at war, playing a knight doing errands for the king.”
- “Just imagine if the story, execution, gameplay, graphics, and everything else appealing were shifted all the way to the left of the slider bar.”
- “You know those Warcraft 3 scenarios where you controlled the minotaur king and did mini quests and explored around?”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players consistently find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and repetitive, leading to a frustrating experience.
- “Grindy.”
- “Tedious.”
- “Tedious.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is notably problematic, with users reporting frequent game-breaking glitches that hinder gameplay, making it difficult to play for extended periods. While some players recall a more stable experience in the past, current reviews highlight significant bugs that disrupt the overall experience.
- “I tried to play for more than an hour, but the game itself just wouldn't allow me due to game-breaking glitches.”
- “It's been years since I played it, so my memory might be hazy, but I did play it to completion and remember it being serviceable, if a bit buggy (i.e., one map required me to defend a building with my hero unit and a few basic infantrymen, and all of the infantrymen died, except for one that somehow got 20 levels ahead of everybody else and became death personified).”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game is largely forgettable, with players indicating that it was neither particularly good nor bad, suggesting it did not leave a significant impression amidst other shortcomings.
- “Honestly don't remember the music, so it probably was only just okay instead of awful; everything else is bad.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game has been criticized for its low replayability, with multiple users rating it just 1 out of 5, indicating a lack of incentive to play again after the initial experience.
- “Replay value - 1/5”
- “Replay value - 1/5”