D.A.M. Champion

About

D.A.M. Champion is a single player tactical role playing game with a comedy theme. It was developed by Ikari Creative and was released on November 14, 2024. It received positive reviews from players.

D.A.M. Champion is a comedic monster tamer game inspired by video games and TV shows during the age of GBA and GBA SP handheld gaming. The story of D.A.M. Champion is set in a dystopian world where most of the world’s economy is connected to technology that involves creating and managing artificial copies of the wild monsters in their world. Humans have been learning more about the monsters in the…

Skip User Reviews

87%

Audience ScoreBased on 23 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

grinding5 negative mentions

Unique monster capture mechanic with an interesting data collection and exchange system.
Fun and fast-paced 3v3 battles with a variety of monsters and moves, allowing team customization.
Active and passionate solo developer who listens to community feedback; game offers good replayability and convenience features like save-anywhere and battle animation skip.

Visual and design inconsistencies including mismatched art styles, lack of evolutionary visuals, and unclear UI elements.
Simplistic and occasionally unbalanced combat with limited strategic depth; some nonsensical design choices like optional trainer battles and punishing random encounter rates.
Story and dialogue contain awkward dark humor that may not appeal to all players; game can feel like a clone with heavy Pokémon similarities and some pacing issues including grinding requirements and confusing monster unlocking.

gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
The gameplay offers a standard top-down RPG experience with a unique monster-taming mechanic and comedic elements, but lacks a standout battle system. While the mechanics are interesting and the presentation decent, issues like mismatched visuals, repetitive maps, and unbalanced difficulty diminish the overall experience. Additionally, some mechanics, such as farming, feel simplistic and uninspired.
- “M Champions is a solid monster tamer with a unique capture mechanic and a comedic spin on the usual monster formula.”
- “It has a unique mechanic to tame monsters.”
- “The mechanics are interesting and the presentation is nice.”
- “First of all, it severely lacks polish: the sprites and tilesets are mismatched, the maps make no sense, the towns and different areas all look samey and like they exist solely to pad out the gameplay by putting dozens of random encounters on your way.”
- “The first thing I did in the game was try to get a full party of monsters, which due to the mechanics of the game required me to go out and beat at least 10 of each monster I wanted to get, which wasn't the best beginning.”
- “In my random wandering, after being curbstomped by endgame-level monsters in an area literally next door to one of the starting fields, I reached a 'farming town' where I 'engaged' with the farming mechanic... which only consists of buying high-priced seeds and water (a night at an inn costs 10 coins, but a bottle of water costs 650... what) and selecting 'yes' on three prompts in a row: one to sow, one to water, one to pick.”
grinding
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding in the game is tedious and somewhat unbalanced, with early progress slowed by the recruitment system and high costs for farming materials. While battles can be sped up, the overall challenge is minimal and largely overcome through repetitive grinding rather than strategic depth.
- “Even at the highest level, the challenge is almost nonexistent as it can be overcome purely by grinding.”
- “In my random wandering, after being curbstomped by endgame-level monsters in an area literally next door to one of the starting fields, I reached a "farming town" where I "engaged" with the farming mechanic... which only consists of buying high-priced seeds and water (a night at an inn costs 10 coins, but a bottle of water costs 650... what) and selecting "yes" on three prompts in a row: one to sow, one to water, one to pick.”
- “I originally thought it would be an RPG with some depth like Digimon or Medabots, but most of it is mindlessly grinding.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story is generally lighthearted and humorous, with some adult themes and entertaining monster designs, though it may not deeply engage all players. Some find the darker elements off-putting but consider them easy to overlook since the story isn't central to the gameplay.
- “This game also has an interesting and hilarious storyline.”
- “The monster designs are cool, the music is actually pretty nice and the story can definitely get a laugh out of you and can get into the more adult side of life topics.”
- “The story here is really awful, but luckily it's not relevant and can be skipped entirely.”
- “The story didn't really get me that invested, but it doesn't have to.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The game's humor attempts a dark, edgy style that some find outdated or uncomfortable, with certain scenes coming across as cringe-worthy rather than funny. While the storyline contains moments of humor, the overall comedic tone may not appeal to everyone.
- “This game also has an interesting and hilarious storyline.”
- “I wouldn't consider it part of the 'dark humor' either, just a product of its time.”
- “The one map I experienced was a linear path with lots of random encounters that ended in a dead end with a (seemingly) racist 'dark humor' scene that was not funny, then required me to backtrack through the linear path back to town.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is consistently praised as good and enjoyable, complementing the monster designs and overall atmosphere. It enhances the experience without overshadowing other elements like dialogue and gameplay freedom.
- “The music is actually pretty nice and the story can definitely get a laugh out of you and can get into the more adult side of life topics.”
- “Good music and monster designs as well.”
- “The music is good, and I also feel like the game gives me more freedom as a player compared to other creature collector RPG games.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The graphics receive criticism for lacking polish, featuring clashing styles, and missing visual notifications like evolution pop-ups. Overall, the visuals are considered basic and may not appeal to players seeking high-quality or detailed graphics.
- “This game definitely needs to address its severe lack of polish, clashing graphical styles, and pacing issues before it can be worth the price of admission.”
- “I would definitely recommend this to players that don't focus too much on expensive visuals.”