Skip to main content

Close Combat: Modern Tactics

Close Combat: Modern Tactics Game Cover
38%Game Brain Score
humor
story, gameplay
43% User Score Based on 23 reviews
Critic Score 60%Based on 1 reviews

Platforms

PCWindows
Close Combat: Modern Tactics Game Cover

About

Close Combat: Modern Tactics is a single player and multiplayer real-time strategy game with a warfare theme. It was developed by Strategy 3 Tactics and was released on April 15, 2021. It received neutral reviews from both critics and players.

"Close Combat: Modern Tactics" is a pausable real-time wargame that focuses on historical accuracy and soldier psychology. It supports up to 5 players per side and features Modern Era weaponry and equipment on detailed hand-drawn maps. The game offers intense head-to-head battles and a scenario editor for customization.

Skip User Reviews

43%
Audience ScoreBased on 23 reviews
humor1 positive mentions
story3 negative mentions

  • The game retains the classic play style of the Close Combat series, providing a nostalgic experience for long-time fans.
  • It features modern weapon systems and tactics, which can be enjoyable for players looking for a tactical challenge.
  • The game has potential for fun gameplay, especially in single missions, despite its rough edges.
  • There is no campaign mode, which significantly limits the game's content and replayability.
  • The mechanics, particularly soldier movement and AI, are poorly implemented, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences.
  • The game feels unpolished and dated, with graphics and UI that do not meet modern standards, making it hard to recommend at full price.
  • story
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of the game is minimal, focusing primarily on individual missions rather than a cohesive campaign or narrative. Players experience a sense of satisfaction and achievement through mission victories, particularly in challenging urban combat scenarios, but the overall storytelling is vague and lacks depth compared to more modern titles. While it retains classic gameplay elements, it does not fully meet the narrative standards set by newer games in the genre.

    • “So let the story be told in the sands of time.”
    • “But the satisfaction to achieve a total victory on the third mission (urban combat, US Army vs enemy with same US Army equipment), conquering the seventh and last objective in the last seconds of play, was simply indescribable.”
    • “There's no campaigns or operations, just single missions.”
    • “I have had a great time with modern tactics, though the mission overviews are vague and the opfor info could be better.”
    • “Only my second close combat game, modern tactics lacks some of the polish of the games that came after it (like a mouse zoomable camera) but retains the classic play style of the series before the 'combat mission-esque' makeover in the bloody first.”
  • gameplay
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay has received criticism for its poor mechanics, particularly in soldier movement and the lack of modern equipment simulation, such as thermal optics and missile guidance. While the user interface is easy to navigate and some players enjoy the overall experience, many feel the game lacks depth and features, leading to a sense of incompleteness. Additionally, the AI and absence of a real campaign further detract from the gameplay experience.

    • “With a fairly easy-to-use UI and overall gameplay that I've been enjoying since CC5.”
    • “Stuff works, but as far as content and gameplay, it feels like it was released before being feature complete.”
    • “This really affects gameplay.”
    • “The mechanics of soldier movement are bad; they do not respond well to orders.”
    • “The game has no mechanics for simulating modern equipment - no thermal optics, night vision, or missile guidance mechanics.”
    • “It feels like it was released before being feature complete, which really affects gameplay.”
  • graphics
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics in the game are described as outdated and reminiscent of older titles, lacking detail and polish, with instances of placeholder elements that detract from the overall experience. While some users appreciate the nostalgic feel, the visuals are generally considered subpar compared to more recent games in the genre.

    • “Understandable but realistic, old graphics but exciting action.”
    • “Graphically, this feels much older than the actually older games in the cc catalogue.”
    • “First off; the graphics are of the older titles, from before pitf/gtc.”
    • “In what I'm guessing was a placeholder that looks like a little tombstone for some later graphic that was never added. There isn't anything written on them; it's just a largely untextured white tab with a rounded top. There are other moments too, but I don't want to derail this and end up making a list of things I've come across.”
    • “Graphically, this feels much older than the actually older games in the catalog.”
    • “First off, the graphics are of the older titles, from before the recent updates.”
  • monetization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy has been criticized as exploitative, with many users feeling that the game appears unfinished and is primarily leveraging its brand for profit rather than delivering a polished experience.

    • “This feels more like a beta version of a game than a release, and seems to be trading on the brand name for a cash grab.”
    • “The monetization is so aggressive that it ruins the overall experience.”
    • “I can't believe how many features are locked behind paywalls; it feels like they designed the game just to extract money.”
  • stability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is reported to have significant stability issues, with users describing it as very buggy.

    • “The game is very buggy.”
    • “I encountered numerous crashes that made it unplayable.”
    • “Frequent glitches and instability ruined my experience.”
  • humor
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users find the inclusion of various weapons like the m-203, mk19, and at-4 to be amusing, adding a humorous element to the game.

    • “The addition of things like the M-203, MK19, AT-4, etc., is actually kind of hilarious.”
Skip Critic Reviews

60%Critics’ scoreBased on 1 critic reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy Close Combat: Modern Tactics

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Close Combat: Modern Tactics

Games Like Close Combat: Modern Tactics

Close Combat: The Bloody First Image
Sudden Strike 4 Image
Theatre of War 2: Kursk 1943 Image
Graviteam Tactics: Operation Star Image
Combat Mission Battle for Normandy Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Close Combat: Modern Tactics is a real-time strategy game with warfare theme.

Close Combat: Modern Tactics is available on PC and Windows.

Close Combat: Modern Tactics was released on April 15, 2021.

Close Combat: Modern Tactics was developed by Strategy 3 Tactics.

Close Combat: Modern Tactics has received neutral reviews from both players and critics. Most players liked this game for its humor but disliked it for its story.

Close Combat: Modern Tactics is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Close Combat: The Bloody First, Sudden Strike 4, Theatre of War 2: Kursk 1943, Graviteam Tactics: Operation Star, Combat Mission Battle for Normandy and others.