BLOCKADE 3D

About

BLOCKADE 3D is a multiplayer open world shooter game. It was developed by Novalink and was released on December 19, 2014. It received neutral reviews from players.

First Person Shooter! Dynamic cubic world where you can build and destroy things and ones. Modern, real prototype of weapons and other liquidating your different-colored enemies will vary your in-game possibilities. A lots of cool game-modes, where you can shoot, destroy, build your own map, be the last-man-standing against zombies in Zombie-Mode, or to arrange a massive tank battle in Tanks Mode.…

Skip User Reviews

52%

Audience ScoreBased on 6,759 reviews

graphics69 positive mentions

stability73 negative mentions

Fun and fast-paced gameplay combining building mechanics with FPS action
Runs smoothly on low-end PCs and is free to play
Various game modes and the ability to build/destroy provide unique tactical gameplay

Nearly all good weapons and armor are locked behind paywalls, making the game pay-to-win
Game is plagued by hackers and cheating players on most servers
The player base is extremely low with many servers empty or only Russia-based causing high ping and lag for others

graphics
270 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
56%
18%
Blockade 3D features simplistic, low-poly, blocky graphics reminiscent of Minecraft, which some players find charming and suitable for lower-end PCs, while others criticize them as dull, outdated, or even worse than Minecraft's visuals. A major graphics update improved visuals but introduced performance issues and alienated fans of the original "potato" style; overall, the game struggles with optimization and lag despite its colorful and vibrant aesthetic. The graphics are generally seen as functional rather than impressive, fitting the game's casual FPS nature but lacking refinement and polish expected by many players.
- “The 3D graphics bring a wholly realistic experience that can fool you into thinking you are amongst the action.”
- “Simple cardboard sticks have been turned into detailed 3D weapons; skins now serve a purpose as you can edit your character how you want with each item per category having their own stats and appearance, and a graphic overhaul makes the game look like another world.”
- “The graphics make games such as Battlefield 4 and Far Cry 4 look outdated, and the gameplay is second to none.”
- “The graphics are terrible and most of the games you won't get a good experience since there are no players or they are pay2win tryhards or hackers.”
- “This game was the best I played but after the new update it's just ruined, the menus are awful, fps drops so low you can't play, graphics are 'improved' but not really, I would recommend not playing it until they fix these problems.”
- “Please bring back the old graphics, just maybe put it in as an option in the settings because it's laggy for me and I've already spent some weapons in this game and I don't want my money to be wasted... so please, bring back the simple graphics because it's so laggy.”
gameplay
270 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
47%
17%
The gameplay is a mix of fast-paced, fluid shooting combined with unique building mechanics, providing an engaging and fun experience for many, especially with friends. However, it is often criticized for pay-to-win elements, unbalanced weapon progression, lag issues, repetitive and simplistic mechanics, and poor server distribution, which diminish enjoyment for some players. Overall, it appeals to casual FPS fans but suffers from balance and monetization problems that affect long-term appeal.
- “This game is actually really fun, and has phenomenal gameplay with friends.”
- “The gameplay, like I said, is great and extremely fun.”
- “The gameplay is literal perfection. Shooting is responsive, the controls are immersive and effortless, and the block mechanic is extremely innovative and creative, something I have never before experienced, and is well implemented into the gameplay.”
- “It used to be amazing; I played it with friends for the zombies modes, but now since they changed the whole game to be focused on CoD-like gameplay, it sucks. Don't recommend anymore.”
- “The gameplay felt completely different: slow movement, heavy feeling, laggy on budget computers.”
- “The gameplay is redundant, the graphics are somewhat worse than Minecraft, lag is highly present, the maps are boring and not creative, the game modes bring nothing new and are boring as hell, and the guns feel somewhat the same.”
humor
84 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
99%
1%
Reviews note that the game's humor is often derived from its quirky, blocky graphics, silly gameplay moments, and player interactions, making it funny especially when playing with friends. However, many find the humor less enjoyable due to pay-to-win elements, hackers, and frustrating gameplay, which diminish the game's original comedic charm. Overall, the humor is appreciated but often overshadowed by gameplay and community issues.
- “Although they made graphic and gameplay improvements in the game, we lost the feel of the old classic Blockade 3D with potato graphics and hilarious gameplay.”
- “I love making small sniper hideouts in buildings and sniping people who are unaware. Spawn killing is a major issue too but I guarantee if you kill one of them back it will be hilarious seeing chat with little children cursing not knowing what they are saying and saying hacks because they think they are invincible. Just don't respond; it's hilarious they keep blabbing in their spawn lifting pressure off your base and making you happy. As I said, just for fun.”
- “The best part about the game is how hilarious it is when you see someone actually taking themselves seriously while playing it.”
stability
74 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
1%
99%
The game suffers from frequent bugs, glitches, crashes, lag, and stability issues, often disrupting gameplay with freezes, random deaths, and server disconnections. While designated as early access and showing some potential, its pay-to-win mechanics and numerous technical problems result in a frustrating and unfinished experience for many players.
- “The game has some bugs and glitches; sometimes it throws you out of the game or disconnects.”
- “FPS randomly spikes from 220 to 6, the game freezes every time I join a server, and there is literally no way to play without buying items.”
- “I would like this game if I wasn't lagging out every five seconds... about 67% of the time, you're at the mercy that the damn lag doesn't screw you over and freezes your character.”
monetization
65 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
60%
31%
The game's monetization is heavily criticized for pervasive and overpriced microtransactions that create a pay-to-win environment, limiting access to decent weapons and content for free players. Many users view it as a cash grab with aggressive in-app purchases that undermine gameplay balance and overall enjoyment. While some acknowledge occasional fun without spending, the overwhelming consensus is frustration and disappointment with the monetization model.
- “It is ok as f2p shooters go, something that stands out is the fact there is no advertisement of products that disturbs gameplay neither does the paid items give a higher advantage.”
- “Pretty sure you unlock the body armor at a certain level too.. anyways, they pretty much screwed up the microtransactions but for me not having spent any money on it I had quite a bit of fun with it.”
- “My opinion quickly became invalid or I thought it was invalid if you play this game with some buddies it can be a really fun game and I said it was pay 2 win but after playing it some more you get free weapons and items so, even though the shop kind of packed with microtransactions but overall I had a lot of fun with this game keep up the good work guys.”
- “On pricing and value for gamers, this isn't really free as the game is infested with mobile app store-like microtransactions.”
- “Once they add game money and not in-game purchases I will change this review.”
- “Players that are just starting can be effective on the battlefield, but will be pwned by anyone that has made five dollars worth of in-game purchases.”
story
42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
74%
12%
The story aspect of the game is highly divisive, with many users stating that the game essentially has no story or only a minimal one, while some praise a surprisingly deep and engaging narrative with meaningful plot twists and character development. Overall, the storytelling is either non-existent or a secondary focus compared to the gameplay, though a few players find personal connection and unique thematic elements within it.
- “The story of Blockade 3D is definitely one of the best stories I've ever connected to (since the dialogue is almost always matched with the gameplay because your teammates are spot on), and especially near the end you gain a deep understanding of the story.”
- “The story line is very heart-warming and quickly evolves into a plot-twist filled feel trip.”
- “The story line is just perfect and don’t get me started on the gameplay, it’s just amazing.”
- “This game has no story.”
- “There is no story.”
- “No story.”
music
35 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
63%
17%
The game's music received mixed reviews, ranging from being described as motivating, fitting, and even outstanding, to being seen as repetitive, mediocre, or painful to listen to. Some users appreciate the title screen and menu music, while others criticize the limited and low-quality soundtrack. Additionally, the mute function often fails to stop the music, leading to further frustration.
- “The music of the game is very nice and motivates you while fighting.”
- “Finding a beautiful, lush, tropical planet is a great reminder of how amazing this game can look, not to mention that the music system is very well done.”
- “The music at the title screen is amazing, so you may just want to install it for that. The music really is awesome, at least in my opinion.”
- “Music is mediocre and the in-game sounds are painful to hear.”
- “There is very little music and what music there is, is actually pretty bad.”
- “- terrible menu music, omg my ears bled.”
- “The music is very jumpy and repetitive as the gameplay is also.”
optimization
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
46%
29%
Optimization reviews are mixed, with several users praising smooth performance on low-end PCs, while many others report significant lag, freezing, and poor GPU utilization, especially in crowded or underground areas. Complaints about pay-to-win mechanics and server issues also contribute to a negative impact on gameplay experience. Overall, the game needs substantial optimization improvements and better server distribution to enhance performance globally.
- “High-quality optimization, beautiful graphics, kind players.”
- “With its low performance gameplay, even my computer that is absolutely appalling can run it.”
- “It's easy, which means anyone can pick it up and play, and it runs smoothly on really any computer you have.”
- “Performance wise, I'm getting 70% GPU usage in the menu with a GTX 1060 in a game this simple.”
- “I do not recommend playing this game, it freezes, optimization sucks, big problems with firing and entering the server.”
- “There are still lots of problems that need to be fixed and the overall optimization of the game needs some improvement.”
grinding
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
86%
Grinding in the game is widely seen as tedious and repetitive, often requiring significant time or monetary investment to progress. While it allows players to obtain rewards without paying, the process can quickly become boring and monotonous over extended play sessions.
- “Early on, the game is very grindy, and exploration can be annoying until you learn how to manage your inventory, along with learning what is and is not important.”
- “As you level up you gain more stuff, but the leveling up process is tedious.”
- “You can still get guns by grinding out levels, but it's much slower.”
emotional
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game evokes strong emotional responses, with players frequently sharing tearful and heartfelt reactions to its impactful storyline and immersive gameplay. Many praise its depth and emotional weight, describing it as life-changing and deeply moving, often causing players to both laugh and cry.
- “Wow, this game changed my life. It is so good. I am proud of myself for playing it. I spent 1000 on it. This is good. I cried at the end of the campaign.”
- “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
- “A very heart-warming storyline which quickly evolves into a plot twist filled feel trip.”
replayability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
28%
43%
The game's replayability is divisive, with some praising its extensive customization and playability, while others find it lacking creativity and lasting appeal, resulting in little to no incentive for repeated play.
- “Infinitely replayable (or almost).”
- “Less pay2win, more playable and a lot of customization for the weapons and for the character!”
- “After the first play, the game offers zero replay value.”
- “Why would someone pay cash in a game that has zero replay value?”
- “It has zero creativity, zero replay value, it's boring as all hell... it just comes by and goes as fast as it came.”
atmosphere
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
Users generally appreciate the game's atmosphere, highlighting its fitting music and immersive seasonal themes, though some feel that certain disruptive elements or characters can detract from the overall experience.
- “I really like the game—the weapons, atmosphere, gameplay, etc.”
- “I generally like everything about the game so far, and the music currently used for the home screen is very fitting to the entire Christmas-related atmosphere!”
- “Can't do that when you have people bloody-well flying, tanks driving through buildings, and this style of atmosphere.”
- “Do you just love running into that loud mouthed child who randomly appears in every game and ruining it?”
- “I really like the game the weapons, atmosphere, gameplays etc.”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The character development in the game is noted for its unique and provocative design choices, including a gender-neutral approach that implies strong female characters. Some users appreciate the depth and historical references embedded in the story, while others criticize the overall character design. Overall, the development is seen as complex and unconventional, eliciting mixed reactions.