Full Mojo Rampage

About

Full Mojo Rampage is a single player and multiplayer strategy game with warfare and historical themes. It was developed by Nival and was released on September 16, 2014. It received positive reviews from players.

"Full Mojo Rampage is a thrilling Warfare Strategy game that offers both multi-player and single-player options. Immerse yourself in a fantastic gameplay experience that allows you to command the Allies, Germans, or Soviets in the decisive battles of WWII. Customize your strategy with the unique and flexible campaign structure, choosing from pre-defined or randomly generated side missions, and unlock promotions, weapons upgrades, and experience points as you progress."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

87%

Audience ScoreBased on 401 reviews

story11 positive mentions

stability11 negative mentions

A classic WWII RTS that remains enjoyable and engaging even after many years.
Offers a deep tactical experience with a variety of units and strategies, rewarding careful planning and execution.
Nostalgic value for many players, with a strong community and modding support enhancing replayability.

Frequent crashes and technical issues, particularly on modern systems, can hinder gameplay.
Pathfinding and AI behavior can be frustrating, leading to unresponsive units and poor tactical decisions.
Some missions can feel repetitive, and the game may not scale well with modern graphics expectations.

story
102 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
84%
5%
The game's story is primarily conveyed through a series of historical and random missions, with players engaging in tactical challenges that require careful planning and execution. While the historical missions are praised for their immersive and engaging scenarios, many players find the random missions repetitive and lacking in depth. Overall, the gameplay experience is driven by the tactical nature of the missions rather than a cohesive narrative, making it appealing for strategy enthusiasts despite some criticisms of repetitiveness and lack of a strong plot.
- “This is followed by the Battle of the Bulge (the two hardest missions of the game) where you must evacuate infantry and equipment from the frontline back to the base while being harassed by German infantry behind your lines, followed by your counterattack on a mission where you need to position your anti-tank, artillery, and tanks to repel German incursions.”
- “After that, you liberate a concentration camp in a very audacious mission behind enemy lines, and the final mission lets you fight in Czechoslovakia.”
- “The historical missions are great and will make you think.”
- “The randomly generated missions between the historical missions start to feel very same and boring very fast.”
- “The downside to the game is that the missions do get repetitive.”
- “Without fail, I have hit a point in every campaign where I need a break - every time I have played through it (more than two dozen times for each side) I will find that the missions get too repetitive and I need to play something else.”
graphics
42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
54%
17%
The graphics of the game are widely regarded as dated, reflecting its early 2000s release, yet many players appreciate their charm and atmospheric quality. While some find the pixel art and 2.5D visuals to be a nostalgic highlight, others note that the graphics may hinder gameplay due to pathfinding issues. Overall, despite their age, the visuals are considered decent and still contribute positively to the game's engaging strategy experience.
- “I love the fact that it is easy to play, and the graphics make it look as realistic as it could be.”
- “The graphics aged like a fine wine, a true classic and a must-have.”
- “The tight pixel art style blended with 3D tanks has allowed the game to age well.”
- “The graphics are outdated and there's no actual plot, but the gameplay drives you forward with this game.”
- “Compared to similar RTS games of the early 2000s era, it's pretty barebones in graphics, and the UI doesn't scale particularly well on modern computers.”
- “Don't expect the graphics to blow you away, but I wasn't really concerned with that.”
gameplay
38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
60%
8%
The gameplay is a standout feature, offering a challenging and strategic experience that rewards careful unit management and tactical decision-making. While the graphics may be dated, the mechanics are engaging and provide a significant amount of content, with some players reporting over 100 hours of gameplay. However, newcomers may find the learning curve steep due to the lack of tutorials and hidden mechanics.
- “The gameplay is difficult and punishes your mistakes, but in a good way.”
- “If you like old strategy games and realistic gameplay, Blitzkrieg is a must-buy.”
- “However, the realistic gameplay always pulls me back to play another mission because it's so much fun to level an entire town with heavy artillery or when I pull off a masterful attack that annihilates the enemy.”
- “Mistakes are punished hard, not much is explained and most mechanics are hidden; bonkeys cannot be consulted or changed.”
- “While the 'realism' is there and the atmosphere is okay-ish, the gameplay is utter sh*t.”
- “The others add a 'timed reinforcements' mechanic that sends you additional units every x minutes, which breaks one of the essential gameplay elements of this game, which is using your units carefully.”
stability
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with users reporting frequent crashes, freezing issues, and various bugs that hinder gameplay, such as a specific bug preventing reinforcements from being called. Many players experience significant performance problems, including sound glitches and system lock-ups, making the game nearly unplayable on some systems. Overall, the stability issues detract significantly from the gaming experience.
- “Buggy, crashes a lot, has a particular bug that refuses to let you call for reinforcements when it's a requirement for winning.”
- “It freezes Steam account and forces a system restart each time and never launches the game.”
- “I love this game from way back but this version is so buggy starting with the sound and eventually just crashed :( not happy.”
replayability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The game is praised for its high replayability, offering numerous mods and diverse strategies for completing missions, which keeps the experience fresh and engaging. Players highlight its classic WWII tactical gameplay as a significant factor contributing to its infinite replay value.
- “For 5 bucks, you get mods galore and tons of replay value.”
- “This game has infinite replayability.”
- “There is a large replayability factor as there are many ways to complete each mission.”
- “A classic WWII tactical game with a lot of replayability!”
- “Large replayability factor as there are many ways to do each mission.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
The game's music and sound design receive high praise, with users highlighting the extraordinary soundtrack and effective sound effects that enhance the overall experience. The background music complements the game's tone and atmosphere, making it engaging and immersive, particularly during the campaigns. Players recommend pairing the game with their favorite WWII film music for an even more captivating experience.
- “The tone of the game (music and overall look) is great.”
- “Three very good campaigns and great background music with multiple tactics and strategies for winning the war!”
- “Love this game with its extraordinary soundtrack.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and frustrating, with some feeling it detracts from the overall experience. The need for excessive grinding can lead to a sense of annoyance, particularly when mechanics like vehicle movement become cumbersome.
- “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding, as it allows you to unlock powerful abilities and gear.”
- “The grind is satisfying, with each level-up feeling like a significant achievement.”
- “I love how the grinding mechanics are balanced; it never feels tedious and always keeps me engaged.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “I remember this being amazing, but when I went back to play it, I found it to be incredibly tedious.”
- “It is very frustrating to ask a vehicle to back away and then have it sit grinding its gears until its armor is all blown away.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
67%
Overall, the game's optimization is mixed; while it generally performs well, players report significant slowdowns on certain maps, particularly in Africa, where infantry movement is sluggish and supply trucks may not respond effectively to commands. Despite these issues, many still find the game enjoyable and worth the price, especially for nostalgic players.
- “During your campaign, you will be given medals based on your performance, all based on real ribbons and awards issued to combat personnel, each with their own hidden requirements.”
- “I'd say if you're into this kind of thing, it's still worth the very reasonable price. It has no performance issues apart from the Africa maps, which caused my infantry to move at a snail's pace and my supply trucks didn't go where I wanted them to, but otherwise, it's alright.”
- “Despite the sometimes shaky performance due to the game being old, and the AI not always listening to your commands, it's one of my childhood games.”
- “I'd say if you're into this kind of thing it's still worth the very reasonable price, but it has performance issues, particularly on the Africa maps, where infantry moves at a snail's pace and my supply trucks didn't go where I wanted them to.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
150%
The atmosphere is generally perceived as decent, with some users appreciating the earthy graphics that enhance the experience, while others find it lacking in realism and overall quality.
- “This is the best of the blitzkriegs as the graphics are earthy and atmospheric.”
- “While the realism is there and the atmosphere is okay, the gameplay is utterly disappointing.”
- “The atmosphere feels lifeless and fails to immerse me in the game world.”
- “Despite the potential, the atmosphere lacks depth and fails to evoke any real emotion.”