Blaster Simulator

About

Blaster Simulator is a single player casual simulation game. It was developed by United Independent Entertainment and was released on April 28, 2016. It received negative reviews from players.

The player assumes the role of a blaster, who works his way up from small jobs to big ones. A level is considered to be solved, if the predetermined demolition rate has been reached and all set targets have been met. The buildings are made of in real-time calculated walls, pillars and carriers which explode or collapse back upon themselves according to the used explosive. Every single action can …

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

32%

Audience ScoreBased on 24 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

graphics4 negative mentions

Some players find the game somewhat fun, especially if they have nostalgia for it.
The game offers a unique niche in demolition simulation that some may appreciate.
It can provide a few moments of enjoyment, particularly if played in a lighthearted context.

The graphics and controls are outdated and poorly implemented, making the game difficult to enjoy.
The physics engine is flawed, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences.
Many players find the game unplayable and not worth the price, with some even suggesting it would be better as an uninstall simulator.

graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
16%
67%
The graphics of the game are widely criticized for being outdated and of poor quality, with issues such as illegible text and buttons on larger screens. Reviewers also note that the overall visual presentation detracts from the gameplay experience, which is further hampered by awkward controls and unsatisfactory physics. Overall, the graphics are seen as a significant drawback, contributing to a lackluster gaming experience.
- “Its age is apparent in its outdated graphics, and it lacks support for larger screens, resulting in illegible text and buttons.”
- “Unfortunately, the graphics and controls are of very poor quality, as is the crucial element for such a game, the physics.”
- “Bought this game expecting a fun sandbox game, but I got a game with poor graphics, awkward controls (sensitivity is very high, unable to change), and just boring gameplay.”
gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay has received largely negative feedback, with users citing poorly implemented controls, high sensitivity that cannot be adjusted, and overall boring mechanics. Many players feel that the game fails to deliver on its promise of an engaging sandbox experience, compounded by subpar graphics.
- “Additionally, the controls are poorly implemented, detracting from the gameplay.”
- “Bought this game expecting a fun sandbox game, but I got a game with poor graphics, awkward controls (sensitivity is very high, unable to change), and just boring gameplay.”
- “Bad gameplay, bad graphics; everything is not good here.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized as "funny bad," with players finding amusement in its shortcomings rather than intentional comedic elements. The juxtaposition of its performance against other games, like GTA 4, adds to the humor, highlighting the absurdity of its existence in a niche market. Overall, while the game may not excel, its flaws provide a source of unintentional entertainment.
- “It's bad, but it's kind of funny bad.”
- “It's funny that in an obscure market segment like demolition games, there could be such a bad attempt that doesn't compare with the already bad market leaders.”
- “One thing would be great: to be able to change key bindings. Funny thing: this game runs well on Windows 10, while GTA 4 does not.”