BitVault

About BitVault

BitVault is a single player puzzle game with a comedy theme. It was developed by Enigma Dragons and was released on March 25, 2020. It received very positive reviews from players.

Become an expert hacker by using your raw brainpower! Learn how to get ahead in your new job at a cybersecurity company. Analyze servers for weaknesses, and hack them using their own subroutines to access the data they protect.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip Games Like BitVault

Looking for games like BitVault? Here are top puzzle recommendations with a comedy focus, selected from player-similarity data — start with Gravity Field, Chip or Brain Break.

80%426reviews

Gravity Field

2023

Simulation

79%378reviews

Chip

2014

Casual Action Adventure

77%200reviews

Brain Break

2020

Tactical Platformer

69%104reviews

Rubek

2016

Casual Puzzle

85%183reviews

SPACE ACCIDENT

2022

Casual Simulation

85%467reviews

Anonymous Hacker Simulator: Prologue

2023

Simulation

69%170reviews

Tavern Cards

2020

Simulation

91%1.9kreviews

Machinika Museum

2021

Casual Puzzle

86%184reviews

Wayout 2: Hex

2017

Casual Puzzle

91%113reviews

Quadrata

2022

Casual Puzzle

More games like BitVault

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

94%Audience ScoreBased on 47 reviews

gameplay9 positive mentions

grinding1 negative mentions

Engaging and clever puzzle gameplay that challenges logical thinking without being overwhelming, suitable for short thoughtful sessions.
Enjoyable hacker/cyberpunk theme with fitting graphics and music that enhance the overall atmosphere.
Good level design with a gradual increase in puzzle difficulty that rewards patience and strategic thinking.

Technical issues with extremely buggy levels in later packs, including broken movement and undo functionality leading to frustrating gameplay.
Story and dialogue presentation are weak and sometimes detract from the experience; story feels unnecessary and poorly written.
User interface and controls are overly simplified and mouse-based only, lacking keyboard support and quality of life features; some restrictive progression and save system frustrations.

gameplay
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
47% positive mentions, 37% neutral mentions, 16% negative mentions
The gameplay is praised for its clever, brain-bending mechanics that provide addictive and thoughtful puzzle-solving experiences, suitable for both short sessions and long engagement. While some find the difficulty curve steep and the story unnecessary, the game's clean design, interactive tutorials, and evolving challenges keep players intrigued. Overall, it offers a satisfying blend of classic puzzle elements with modern twists, though some users mention it could benefit from additional quality-of-life improvements.
- “The gameplay stays brain bending without being overwhelming, perfect for short thoughtful sessions.”
- “The clever mechanics and clean design kept me engaged the whole time, and I kept coming back just to see if I could solve the trickiest challenges.”
- “The gameplay is very addicting, in places very tight and makes you strain your brains.”
- “Could use a bit more quality of life, $12 is crazy, and they might as well not have bothered with the story, but even though I didn't get far, it would be good enough otherwise if you like the core mechanic.”
- “The game mechanics are easy to understand yet not that intuitive when the levels get a bit more complicated, which makes the difficulty curve way steeper than it should be in my opinion.”
- “The puzzles themselves are based on marble solitaire, with additional gameplay elements added every 12 levels.”
graphics
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
46% positive mentions, 31% neutral mentions, 23% negative mentions
The game's graphics are predominantly minimalistic and retro-inspired, featuring sharp, neon visuals that fit its theme well, though some find them simplistic or underdeveloped. While visually appealing to some, others see the low-polygon, untextured style as a sign of limited effort rather than intentional art design. Overall, the graphics complement the gameplay but are not the main focus, with music and level complexity drawing more praise.
- “The graphics are visually appealing, and the gameplay is addictive.”
- “The game has nice graphics and a storyline that you can get immersed in.”
- “The graphics are sharp and the gameplay is addictive.”
- “The interface and the puzzle itself could be made prettier, but the main thing here is not the graphics, but the complexity and variety of levels-puzzles.”
- “The visuals are minimalistic but fit the theme of the game very well, the soundtrack is pretty good, and the story is... well, let's not talk about the story.”
- “The lack of textures is a method that lazy devs often use to disguise their lack of talent or interest in doing the graphics properly, trying to disguise it under the name of 'art' or 'we made it look bad on purpose', which really isn't something gamers should have to put up with.”
story
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25% positive mentions, 50% neutral mentions, 25% negative mentions
The story in the game is generally seen as weak or poorly written, with some reviewers finding it unnecessary or detracting from the experience. While the plot involves hacking and features quirky characters, it often comes across as cheesy or ill-fitting, though a few players appreciate its humor and immersion. Overall, the story is considered secondary to the core puzzle mechanics and may not satisfy those expecting a strong narrative.
- “The game has nice graphics and a storyline that you can get immersed in.”
- “There is a rather elaborate plot with peculiar characters.”
- “Interesting puzzle game with a fun story filled with cheesy jokes.”
- “There's a badly written story mode about hacking or something, but the writing is so bad it makes the game considerably worse than just a faceless mobile app would be.”
- “Can choose story or only puzzles mode and a male or female avatar, but no player profiles; starting a new game erases the save.”
- “Could use a bit more quality of life, $12 is crazy, and they might as well not have bothered with the story, but even though I didn't get far, it would be good enough otherwise if you like the core mechanic.”
music
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
42% positive mentions, 33% neutral mentions, 25% negative mentions
The game's music is generally well-received for being engaging, fitting the electronic and retro vibe, and unobtrusive, though some find it repetitive or mismatched with the game's style. Overall, the soundtrack enhances the puzzle experience and atmosphere.
- “Honestly, I want to go back and spend even more time in this game, not just but because of the music.”
- “The game's neon visuals and electronic soundtrack keep players engaged.”
- “Graphics have retro vibes and soundtracks fit intensive actions perfectly.”
- “Graphics are fine, but the music is pretty good only if repetitive, with a single track for each pack.”
- “We still need to work on the soundtrack!”
- “I did not like the music; it does not fit the style and plot of the game.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The humor in the game is well-received, described as enjoyable and genuinely funny, successfully eliciting smiles and positive reactions from players.
- “Surprisingly, the humor in this game is cool and makes you smile.”
- “The humor in the game is funny and enjoyable.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Users find the grinding aspect tedious and unengaging, often leading to it being ignored altogether due to its repetitive nature and lack of stimulation.
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game's stability is generally acceptable in early stages but becomes problematic in later levels due to significant bugs.
- “Later levels are extremely buggy.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The monetization approach is widely criticized as manipulative and deceptive, with evidence of coordinated fake reviews promoting the game shortly after launch. Users perceive it as a cash grab or scam, reflecting negatively on the game's integrity.