Skip to main content
Battlefield REDSEC Game Cover

About

Battlefield REDSEC is a single player and multiplayer shooter game. It was developed by Battlefield Studios and was released on October 28, 2025. It received neutral reviews from players.

Battlefield REDSEC delivers intense squad-based combat across massive, destructible environments with modes like Battle Royale, Gauntlet elimination, and Portal for endless customization. Set in Southern California's classified military zones, it offers dynamic gameplay featuring cutting-edge weapons, vehicles, and evolving seasonal content. Engage in high-stakes battles where strategic survival and rapid adaptability are key.

Skip User Reviews

44%
Audience ScoreBased on 8,747 reviews
gameplay146 positive mentions
monetization116 negative mentions

  • The game features impressive graphics and destruction mechanics, enhancing the overall gameplay experience.
  • The Gauntlet mode is a fun and engaging addition, offering a unique competitive experience with various objectives.
  • The Battle Royale mode provides a fresh take on the genre, combining Battlefield elements with traditional BR gameplay.
  • The game suffers from significant bugs, including hit registration issues and audio problems, making gameplay frustrating.
  • The inclusion of tanks in the Battle Royale mode disrupts balance and gameplay, leading to unfun experiences.
  • Players are forced to engage with the Battle Royale mode to complete challenges for the main game, which many find unwelcome.
  • gameplay
    498 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of "Redsec" has received mixed reviews, with many praising its integration of classic Battlefield mechanics like destruction and vehicle gameplay, while others criticize it for feeling too similar to Call of Duty's Warzone. Players appreciate the smooth movement and gunplay, but express frustration over issues like clunky mechanics, inconsistent hit registration, and a lack of polish. Overall, while the game offers a fun and chaotic experience, it struggles with bugs and design choices that detract from the traditional Battlefield experience.

    • “Excited tone this game totally redefines action with its epic graphics and smooth gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay is enjoyable.”
    • “The gameplay feels great and fairly realistic.”
    • “Battlefield 6 Redsec isn’t worth playing because the gameplay feels rushed and broken.”
    • “There’s rarely a sense of momentum or flow during matches—just sporadic fights scattered across oversized arenas that often feel like they were designed around vehicles first and infantry gameplay second.”
    • “The gameplay itself is a shallow clone of Warzone, lacking the tactical weight of PUBG or any unique identity.”
  • story
    299 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of the game is largely criticized for being weak and uninspired, with many players finding the missions repetitive and lacking depth. While some appreciate the addition of missions for loot and engagement, they often feel disconnected from a compelling narrative, leading to a perception of a disjointed experience. Overall, the storyline is seen as minimal, with players expressing a desire for more fleshed-out characters and meaningful plot elements.

    • “The missions are much more interesting than in similar games — it’s not just 'kill players,' 'open a crate,' 'stay alive for 5 minutes,' and other repetitive stuff.”
    • “Redsec is awesome, unique, fun so far, easy to understand, missions make sense because obviously you want to get better gear, it hits much different than most and that's fine with me, and has lots of realistic destruction that you simply won't get in many other games.”
    • “The combat is chaotic, unbalanced, and way too focused on constant missions and objectives that don’t really add anything meaningful to the gameplay.”
    • “Finally, the game has boring missions and weak story elements.”
    • “Many players say the storyline doesn’t make sense and the missions all feel the same.”
    • “The missions are uninspired and the performance is pretty bad compared to the main game.”
  • graphics
    186 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the stunning visuals, impressive destructibility, and cinematic quality, while others criticize performance issues and outdated aesthetics reminiscent of older titles. Some players report smooth gameplay on mid-range hardware, but others experience significant lag and graphical glitches, leading to frustration. Overall, while the graphics are often described as beautiful and immersive, optimization and consistency remain points of contention among users.

    • “Battlefield 6 looks insane! The graphics, sound, and physics are super accurate and make everything feel real.”
    • “The graphics are phenomenal paired with great optimization!”
    • “The destruction mechanics and graphics are just crazy.”
    • “The graphics look like they were stolen from a 2005 mobile game, and somehow the frame rate still drops below 30.”
    • “The graphics are terrible - 2010s level, the interface is also outdated, not optimized at all, which causes constant freezes regardless of the graphics settings.”
    • “The map lacks detail and some interiors look like Roblox level of graphics (no shaders, furniture straight from poly haven or something etc.).”
  • monetization
    170 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization model of the game has drawn significant criticism for being overly aggressive and intrusive, with players reporting constant pop-up ads, a costly battle pass, and numerous microtransactions that detract from the overall experience. Many feel that the game, which already carries a hefty price tag, is being treated as a cash grab, prioritizing profit over player satisfaction and diluting the core gameplay with excessive advertisements and cosmetic purchases. Overall, the monetization strategy is seen as a major flaw, overshadowing the game's potential and alienating its dedicated fanbase.

    • “The monetization is very in your face though.”
    • “Microtransactions will always be in these types of games, but here's the cool part: you don't need to buy them.”
    • “As for monetization – since that’s drawn quite a bit of criticism – overall, I think the skins are well-designed, though of course that’s subjective.”
    • “The rest of the game is essentially pay-locked if you purchase Battlefield 6, which went from being BF's ultimate comeback to a pay-to-play game mostly when you download Redsec, with this game now having an expensive battle pass on a game that's already nearly $70, an in-game currency/microtransactions, and a shop.”
    • “Imagine buying a Battlefield game expecting a Battlefield game for $70.00 only to realize more effort went into a discount Warzone battle royale, removing portal XP, and shoving an advertisement for a $35.00 terrible battle pass every time you boot up the game.”
    • “It's a cynical cash grab design to hijack the success of Warzone.”
  • optimization
    148 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its solid performance on high-end hardware and smooth gameplay, while others report significant issues such as frame drops, lag, and poor performance on mid-range systems. Many users express frustration over the game's inconsistent optimization, particularly in demanding scenarios, leading to a frustrating experience for those with lower-end setups. Overall, while there are commendable aspects of optimization, substantial improvements are still needed to enhance the experience for a broader range of players.

    • “The optimization is surprisingly solid and the game holds up well even during intense action.”
    • “The game is well optimized and runs like a charm on ultra settings, though you can go lower to high without any significant visual impact.”
    • “Destruction and stuff as in any battlefield, is as good as always, and performance-wise it runs insanely smooth too, especially for how the game looks, running at 100fps stable most of the time.”
    • “The performance is an absolute nightmare.”
    • “Possibly the most unoptimized game I have ever played.”
    • “Absolutely horrible optimization.”
  • stability
    137 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is heavily criticized, with players reporting numerous bugs and glitches that significantly detract from the experience, including issues with sound, hit detection, and character movement. Many users describe the game as a "buggy mess," with frequent crashes, unresponsive controls, and poor optimization leading to frustrating gameplay. While some acknowledge that the game has potential, the overwhelming consensus is that it feels unfinished and requires substantial fixes before it can be considered stable or enjoyable.

    • “Plays well, lots of fun, looks stunning and runs great.”
    • “I'm playing on a decent system (4070) and it runs great for me and looks great.”
    • “It's fun, free, runs great, looks good.”
    • “Instead of enjoying battles, you spend most of your time dealing with glitches and bugs.”
    • “This game feels like it was released in early alpha, it’s packed with more bugs and glitches than Cyberpunk 2077 at launch.”
    • “In general, this game just feels extremely buggy and unpolished.”
  • humor
    39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is often described as chaotic and absurd, with players finding amusement in its numerous bugs, glitches, and the reactions of the community, particularly from those comparing it to other titles like Call of Duty. Many reviews highlight the hilarity of unexpected moments during gameplay, as well as the irony in negative feedback from players who seem overly invested in the game's shortcomings. Overall, the game's comedic elements stem from both its technical issues and the lively interactions among players.

    • “A hilarious, chaotic, beautiful mess.”
    • “If you have a decent squad, prepare for some hilarious, destructive moments.”
    • “You must secure and hold a point to bring teammates back, which creates tense and often hilarious clutch moments.”
    • “The video game crash is so insanely long overdue, it's not funny.”
  • grinding
    31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players express significant frustration with the grinding aspect of the game, describing it as excessively time-consuming and often tied to monetization strategies like battle passes. Many feel that the progression system is tedious and lacks meaningful rewards, with some suggesting that it forces players into a grind reminiscent of free-to-play models. While the core gameplay remains enjoyable, the overwhelming grind for unlocks and upgrades detracts from the overall experience.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “But those moments are rare, buried under long stretches of empty running, questionable design choices, and a progression system that lost all meaning the moment bot XP farming became the norm.”
    • “My biggest complaint from this game is probably how time-consuming grinding the attachment upgrades are.”
    • “Clearly they released BF6 thinking more about farming money with the battle royale season pass than about the game itself.”
  • atmosphere
    22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere in Battlefield 6 is generally praised for its cinematic quality, immersive environments, and attention to detail, evoking nostalgia for the series' iconic moments. Players appreciate the scale of the maps, solid gunplay, and the overall excitement of matches, although some express a desire for improved weather dynamics and less cluttered visuals. While there are minor flaws, the game successfully captures the essence of the Battlefield experience, making it enjoyable for both new and returning players.

    • “The atmosphere is amazing, gameplay is brilliant; yeah, there are bugs here and there, but the overall experience is a lot better than we'd expect!”
    • “The environments are full of detail, lighting and effects are atmospheric, and the scale of the map gives you that 'wow' moment on drop-in.”
    • “I feel like they did a good job creating a captivating atmosphere that really feels like Battlefield.”
    • “Nothing fits the atmosphere of the Battlefield series.”
    • “The new skins directly conflict with the marketed tone of the game and ruin the 'grounded' atmosphere.”
    • “Mechanics perfected in past titles, from BFV’s building and customization to BF1’s atmosphere and breakthrough, have been forgotten.”
  • replayability
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers significant replayability through a variety of modes, including battle royale, gauntlet, and portal, which allow for diverse gameplay experiences and strategic depth. Players appreciate the dynamic nature of matches, where no two games feel the same due to varying player interactions and weapon availability. While some feel that certain features could enhance replayability further, the overall consensus is that the game provides a solid foundation for repeated play.

    • “The variety of modes: battle royale delivers the classic 100-player survival chaos, gauntlet adds a cutthroat elimination twist, and portal lets you remix maps, weapons, and rules for endless replayability.”
    • “That level of destruction gives it way more replayability because no match ever plays the same.”
    • “The overall gameplay has attracted me to some degree, and I do appreciate that no games feel the same as you do not get the same guns, the same players, and it's never the same actions that are taken from one game to another... replayability is the term for that, if I recall correctly.”
    • “It adds a layer of strategy and replayability depending on team composition, and that’s something most battle royales completely miss.”
    • “If you enjoy Battlefield’s sandbox combat but want something with higher stakes and more replayability, give Redsec a fair try; it’s way better than the reviews make it seem.”
  • emotional
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews highlight a stark contrast in emotional experiences with the game; while some players express frustration and disappointment, particularly when playing solo, others find joy and nostalgia when playing with friends. The emotional impact seems heavily dependent on the social aspect of gameplay, with cooperative play enhancing enjoyment and mitigating negative feelings. Overall, the game elicits a mix of emotions, from joy and nostalgia to frustration and disappointment, particularly among solo players.

    • “Don't listen to mixed reviews, they're noobs xd I don't play PC games because they don't feel the same as when I was a child, but this game made me feel great again. If you have a friend, it will be fun as hell. Just install it with your friend. The first 2-3 matches will be hard and confusing, as well as the menu, but it is simple. Just install it, you won't regret it!”
    • “Meanwhile, some hardcore Battlefield veterans are in the corner having a full emotional meltdown.”
    • “Most negative reviews are not about the game but rather a targeted emotional sentiment about having a battle royale, so don't listen to them.”
  • music
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is described as feeling out of place, resembling a battlefield soundtrack that lacks the necessary action elements. Additionally, players express frustration over the inability to adjust the music volume until after an extended loading sequence, contributing to an overall negative impression of the game's audio experience.

    • “The only thing I feel missing is a perfect action music.”
    • “Music playing while half dead.”
    • “Something about this whole game just doesn't feel right; it feels like a battlefield soundtrack.”
    • “Well, to start off, this game is bad from the moment it loads up. It doesn't allow you to turn the music down/off until you go through 5 minutes of shaders and cinematic slop.”
    • “The way it doesn't have solos or trios, or the way it feels like you're Quasimodo with your leg cut off while you try to traverse the map.”
  • character development
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews indicate that character development is hindered by excessive battle pass content, which detracts from meaningful character progression. Additionally, the character design is noted to be visually appealing but lacks depth in backstory and growth, leaving players wanting more substantial development.

    • “The character development feels shallow and uninspired, making it hard to connect with any of the characters.”
    • “I was disappointed by the lack of meaningful choices in character progression; it feels like a grind without any real impact.”
    • “The characters lack depth and their backstories are poorly fleshed out, leaving me feeling disconnected from the narrative.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Battlefield REDSEC

74h Median play time
787h Average play time
10-100h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 12 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Battlefield REDSEC

Games Like Battlefield REDSEC

Battlefield 6 Image
Splitgate 2 Image
Delta Force Image
Battlefield 2042 Image
Highguard Image
Skip Game News
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Battlefield REDSEC is a shooter game.

Battlefield REDSEC is available on Xbox Series X|S, PC, PlayStation 5 and Windows.

On average players spend around 787 hours playing Battlefield REDSEC.

Battlefield REDSEC was released on October 28, 2025.

Battlefield REDSEC was developed by Battlefield Studios.

Battlefield REDSEC has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its monetization.

Battlefield REDSEC is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Battlefield 6, Splitgate 2, Delta Force, Battlefield 2042, Highguard and others.