B-17 Flying Fortress : The Mighty 8th Redux

Starting at €14.79Buy now

"B-17 Flying Fortress: The Mighty 8th Redux" is a WWII air combat simulator that puts you in the role of a B-17 bomber crew member. Experience the intensity of flying through anti-aircraft fire and fending off enemy fighters on dangerous bombing missions. This redux version enhances the original game's engine to support DX 12 functionality, providing a remastered experience for fans of the classic title. Take control of different crew roles and lead your team to victory or defeat in fierce aerial combat.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Reviews

61%

Audience ScoreBased on 380 reviews

story6 positive mentions

stability47 negative mentions

The game brings back fond memories of the original, providing a nostalgic experience for long-time fans.
The updated interiors and crew models are visually appealing, enhancing the overall immersion of the game.
The developers are actively working on patches and updates, showing commitment to improving the game over time.

The game is plagued with bugs, including crashes and issues with AI behavior, making it frustrating to play.
The user interface and controls are clunky and outdated, leading to a steep learning curve and difficulty in navigation.
Many features from the original game remain unfixed, and the exterior graphics have not been significantly improved, leaving the game feeling incomplete.

story
207 mentions
3 % positive mentions
95 % neutral mentions
2 % negative mentions
The story aspect of "B-17: The Mighty 8th" immerses players in the harrowing experiences of WWII bomber crews, allowing them to manage missions and navigate through enemy territory while facing the constant threat of flak and enemy fighters. Players report feeling a deep connection to the historical context, as they honor the sacrifices of real-life aviators through their gameplay. However, many also express frustration with numerous bugs and glitches that detract from the overall experience, making it difficult to fully engage with the narrative.
- “With each mission, I found myself transported back in time, flying alongside fellow aviators, navigating through enemy territory, and braving the relentless onslaught of enemy fighters and anti-aircraft fire.”
- “As I guided my B-17 Flying Fortress through the tumultuous skies of war-torn Europe, I couldn't help but feel a profound sense of admiration and respect for the real-life heroes who flew these missions, knowing that their courage and sacrifice paved the way for freedom and victory.”
- “And as I completed each mission and honored the memory of those who came before me, I felt a profound sense of gratitude for the opportunity to pay homage to the heroes of the Eighth Air Force.”
- “There's nothing more frustrating than spending an hour on a mission, fighting your way to the target, nailing it dead center, fighting your way out, taking damage, barely making it back to the English coast... and then the game crashes. There are still a lot of glitches and bugs to work out.”
- “The training missions, same as the original, are broken in redux. I couldn't get past the training missions as they were bugged.”
- “The game isn't cooked enough to be sold; training missions bugged for me five times, then on a real mission my crew just disappeared for no reason.”
graphics
116 mentions
19 % positive mentions
71 % neutral mentions
10 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many players noting that while the interior graphics and some textures have been improved, the external visuals remain outdated and reminiscent of the original game's 2000 release. Users express hope for future updates to enhance the overall graphical quality, particularly for terrain and aircraft models, as the current state detracts from the immersive experience. Overall, while some appreciate the nostalgic elements, others find the graphics lacking compared to modern standards, indicating a need for further development.
- “They just released a graphic overhaul of the exterior models, and that in itself is a game changer.”
- “The interior graphics rework is lovely, and the much higher resolution looks great. I'm looking forward to seeing the other updates.”
- “So far, I've found this game to be a very promising remaster of the original, and from what we've seen already of the new graphics, I'm very excited to see what's coming in the future.”
- “The graphics in this game are terrible and that makes all the difference during a bombing run.”
- “Outdated external graphics - planes, land, sky - everything looks the same as in the year 2000.”
- “Unfortunately, at this stage, we receive the same game, with the same 24-year-old bugs, the same 24-year-old graphics, with a few polished elements like crew model textures, interior backgrounds (plane and base), and widescreen.”
stability
47 mentions
0 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
The game's stability has been widely criticized, with many players reporting frequent crashes, unresponsive controls, and various glitches that hinder gameplay. While some acknowledge improvements since its initial buggy release, the consensus is that it remains too unstable and unfinished for a full recommendation, especially in its current early access state. Overall, players express frustration over the game's unreliability, suggesting significant work is still needed to enhance stability and fix persistent issues.
- “Was looking forward to this game; however, it either crashes on startup, the controls don't respond, or the game freezes up.”
- “There's nothing more frustrating than spending an hour on a mission, fighting your way to the target, nailing it dead center, fighting your way out, taking damage, barely making it back to the English coast...aaaaaand the game crashes. There are still a lot of glitches and bugs to work out.”
- “It's extremely buggy and missing features from the original release, such as the ability to check the weather and attack alternate targets. Bugs are everywhere; I have no ability to use the look left or right when in gun positions, my joystick's hat switch isn't recognized, and fires and explosions from aircraft or bombs hitting the ground are missing most of the effect.”
gameplay
32 mentions
38 % positive mentions
53 % neutral mentions
9 % negative mentions
The gameplay of the redux version has received mixed reviews, with players appreciating the realistic mechanics and clever features, but also criticizing persistent bugs and outdated mechanics reminiscent of the original game. While some users find the core gameplay engaging and immersive, others express frustration over new issues that detract from the experience, suggesting that the developers should prioritize gameplay improvements over graphics updates. Overall, the game shows potential but is not yet polished enough for a seamless experience.
- “Now the team at MicroProse have brought this back with a number of updates to the graphics and core gameplay functions.”
- “It still has older graphics; however, the gameplay is really good and realistic.”
- “Finally, a timeline system trying to outlast the duration of the war with new technologies being introduced and incorporated, changing gameplay/features along the way.”
- “They introduced new bugs that tarnish the entire gameplay experience.”
- “Not ready for prime time yet still too buggy and stupid mechanics that need to be addressed from the original release, like enemy aircraft smashing into you in head-on collisions that are way over the top, and also crashes in time skips and changing stations quite a bit too.”
- “It is one thing to want to remake a classic game, it is quite another to ignore 30 years of interaction design improvements to create an absolute disaster of cumbersome game mechanics out of nostalgia.”
optimization
7 mentions
0 % positive mentions
57 % neutral mentions
43 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has received largely negative feedback, with users reporting significant performance issues and stuttering, particularly when switching views. However, some improvements have been noted, such as better control binding and reduced joystick sensitivity, leading to a more competent AI. Overall, while there are some enhancements, the optimization remains a major concern for players.
- “Optimization is horrid.”
- “Performance issues.”
- “The only stuttering that I have experienced has been when I've switched from the cabin view to the action view.”
replayability
4 mentions
50 % positive mentions
50 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
Reviewers highlight the game's significant improvement in replayability compared to its predecessor, noting its potential for fun and engaging experiences. While not flawless, many believe it offers ample opportunities for repeated play.
- “I can see the potential, and while not perfect, I think the promise is there for lots of fun and replayability.”
- “The game is infinitely more playable than the original ever was.”
monetization
2 mentions
0 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game is perceived as a quick cash grab, lacking depth and long-term engagement, which raises concerns about its sustainability and player value.
- “Starting to look more and more like a quick cash grab with no follow through.”
emotional
2 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
Players report a profound emotional impact from the game, experiencing intense feelings of horror and panic despite knowing the characters are fictional. This emotional engagement highlights the game's ability to evoke genuine reactions and immerse players in its narrative.
- “I know it's just a game and these aren't real people, but holy crap the horror of watching that in a game and the heart-wrenching panic I felt willing those guys to bail out sure felt real.”
humor
2 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is often derived from its retro graphics, with many players finding it amusing that the visuals resemble outdated 16-bit styles. This nostalgic element adds a layer of comedic charm to the overall experience.
- “It's hilarious because most of them are like 16-bit at best.”
music
2 mentions
0 % positive mentions
50 % neutral mentions
50 % negative mentions
The menu music is criticized for its poor audio quality, as it features a noticeable loud click each time it loops and alternates between the left and right speakers, detracting from the overall experience.
- “The menu music flops back and forth between the left and right speaker with a loud click every time it loops.”
grinding
1 mentions
0 % positive mentions
-200 % neutral mentions
300 % negative mentions
Users express a strong sentiment towards grinding, often describing it as a tedious and exhausting process that can detract from the overall enjoyment of the game.
- “Grinding feels like a never-ending chore that takes away from the enjoyment of the game.”
- “The repetitive nature of grinding makes it feel more like a job than a fun gaming experience.”
- “I find myself spending hours grinding for minimal rewards, which is incredibly frustrating.”