AXE:SURVIVAL
- January 14, 2019
- DCELL GAME STUDIO
Get on SteamAXE:SURVIVAL is an open-world survival game where players must build their own shelter and gather resources to survive. Each day presents new challenges as players fight against hunger, thirst, and cold. The game's mechanics become increasingly difficult over time, requiring players to constantly adapt and improve their survival skills.
PC
Windows
Reviews
- Open world environment allows for exploration.
- Basic crafting and base building mechanics are present.
- Multiple weapon types can be found throughout the map.
- Game is plagued by poor graphics and animations, resembling a low-effort asset flip.
- Lacks objectives, tutorials, and meaningful gameplay, leading to a monotonous experience.
- Technical issues make the game unplayable, with frequent lag and broken mechanics.
- graphics3 mentions
- 67 % positive mentions
- -67 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Reviews on the graphics are mixed; while some praise them as impressive and reminiscent of high-quality titles like Crysis from 2014, others criticize them as subpar. Overall, the graphics receive a decent rating of 7/10, indicating a level of satisfaction but not without notable flaws.
“Although the graphics are amazing (like 2014 Crysis amazing!), I cannot find myself returning to this game after one gameplay session.”
“The graphics are terrible, making it hard to immerse myself in the game.”
“The visuals look outdated and lack detail, which really detracts from the overall experience.”
“The graphics are subpar, and it feels like the game was rushed without proper attention to visual quality.”
- gameplay2 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The gameplay is visually impressive, reminiscent of high-quality graphics from 2014, but it lacks the engagement to encourage repeated play sessions. Overall, it receives a score of 7/10, indicating that while it can provide hours of entertainment, it may not be compelling enough for long-term enjoyment.
“Gameplay: 7/10 can entertain for hours”
“Although the graphics are amazing (like 2014 Crysis amazing!), I cannot find myself returning to this game after one gameplay session.”
- story1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The story received a mixed reception, with a score of 6/10 indicating that it is not very well developed, leaving players wanting more depth and complexity.
“The story is rated 6/10; it feels underdeveloped.”
“The narrative lacks depth and fails to engage the player.”
“Character motivations are unclear, making it hard to connect with the story.”
- music1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The music in the game received a mixed response, with an average rating of 6/10, indicating that while it is decent, there is significant room for improvement.
“The music is decent, but it feels repetitive and lacks variety.”
“While the soundtrack has some good tracks, overall it doesn't leave a lasting impression.”
“The background music is often drowned out by sound effects, making it hard to appreciate.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Reviews indicate that the monetization strategy is perceived as exploitative, with some users criticizing the game for being a cash grab disguised as an "early access" title, suggesting a lack of genuine content or value.
“Hiding behind 'early access' is the biggest joke there is, when your game is nothing more than a worthless cash grab.”
“The monetization strategy feels exploitative, as it prioritizes profit over player experience.”
“It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind paywalls, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending extra money.”
- replayability1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Reviewers suggest that the game's replayability is currently hindered by playability issues, indicating that improvements from the developer could enhance the overall experience and encourage players to return.
“The game lacks meaningful choices, making replayability feel pointless.”
“Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to play again.”
“The limited variety in gameplay mechanics means that replaying feels more like a chore than a fun experience.”
- humor1 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is perceived as lacking, with users finding it more of a waste of time than entertaining, and they also criticize its pricing as absurdly high.
