Gone: Survival

About

Gone: Survival is a single player survival simulation game. It was developed by Coden Studio and was released on October 20, 2020. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Gone: Survival" is a first-person open-world survival game set in a post-apocalyptic world. Players must scavenge for resources, craft tools, and build shelters to survive against harsh weather conditions and dangerous wildlife. With a focus on exploration and player choice, each decision made can impact the player's chances of survival and the story's outcome.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

48%

Audience ScoreBased on 154 reviews

story2 positive mentions

stability14 negative mentions

The game has potential and can be fun if developed further, with some players enjoying the basic survival mechanics.
Graphics are decent, and the game runs smoothly for some players, providing a playable experience despite its flaws.
The crafting and looting systems have been noted as interesting, with some players finding enjoyment in the gameplay.

The game is plagued by bugs, including frequent freezes, crashes, and issues with saving progress, making it frustrating to play.
Many players feel the game is unfinished and abandoned, with no updates for over two years, leading to a lack of content and polish.
Crafting mechanics are criticized for being unbalanced and illogical, with resource gathering being tedious and not rewarding.

stability
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, frequently freezing when accessing the inventory or map, which can result in lost progress if not saved. Users report that these bugs have persisted for over two years, leading to frustration and a sense of abandonment regarding updates. Overall, while the game has potential, its stability problems severely hinder the gameplay experience.
- “The game freezes frequently if you hit tab to check inventory or the game settings.”
- “Freezes instantly and you will lose everything and start over from the last saved spot.”
- “I would have played more than 3 hours, but when I accidentally click the map and the esc key at the same time, the game freezes... and if I hadn't saved, the only way to go back is to reboot and start over at the last save point.”
graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
58%
25%
The graphics of the game are generally considered acceptable but in need of significant updates, with some users noting a resemblance to late 2000s titles. Players have experienced issues with graphics settings not saving, and performance seems to be heavily influenced by the quality of the GPU used. Overall, while the graphics are not groundbreaking, they are serviceable, particularly at lower settings.
- “Graphics still look good, to be honest. It reminds me of the late 2000s, or '7 Days to Die' quality.”
- “I'm running a Ryzen 7 with an RTX 2060 KO graphics card and 32 GB of memory.”
- “Graphics are okay but need a lot of updating.”
- “I found that when setting up the graphics, they did not remain set and had to be reset every time.”
- “I played with it on a few machines and realized it's caused by a low-quality GPU trying to run the game. If you set the game's graphics quality to very low, it will fix it.”
gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
50%
30%
The gameplay is described as lacking a tutorial, which makes it challenging for new players to grasp the mechanics, some of which are buggy. Users report frequent crashes, ranging from occasional to every ten minutes, but note that with a little time, players can learn to navigate the game effectively. Overall, while it offers a unique survival gathering experience, many feel it does not justify its value.
- “Just take a few minutes to understand the mechanics and you'll be fine.”
- “If you want to have a look at some gameplay, I've made a video :) thanks!”
- “The major thing about the game is that it has no tutorial on how to do what, and some of the mechanics are a little buggy.”
- “Randomly crashes (can crash once every few days or every ~10 minutes of gameplay).”
- “I would judge the game to be worth $2 if you like survival gathering game experiences; it's worth another new perspective but not worth the gameplay.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
The game currently requires further optimization, as players report that reducing the resolution can mitigate bugs. Despite these issues, the gameplay environment is engaging and chaotic, reminiscent of "Left 4 Dead," making it a fun experience for those looking for action. However, it lacks MMO features at this stage.
- “The bugs are really no problem; just reduce your resolution and they seem to go away, which means it still needs to be optimized. If you want a place to crack some heads, it is set up for optimization right now, and zombies and animals are everywhere, so it is total slaughter like the Left 4 Dead crews, but no MMO yet.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers feel that the game's story lacks depth, suggesting that a more developed backstory would enhance both the enjoyment and realism of the experience.
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The game's replayability is currently hindered by numerous bugs and unclear crafting mechanics, making it difficult for players to progress through initial tasks. While it shows potential, many users express hope for future updates to enhance gameplay and make it more enjoyable. As it stands, the early access status leaves players uncertain about recommending it for replay value.
- “The game lacks replayability due to its repetitive tasks and limited content, making it feel like a chore rather than an enjoyable experience.”
- “After completing the main objectives, there isn't much incentive to return, as the gameplay doesn't offer new challenges or experiences.”
- “The early access status is evident in the lack of variety and depth, which severely impacts the game's replayability.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized as a cash grab, with reviewers noting a lack of originality and effort, suggesting that it relies on a generic template rather than offering a unique experience.
- “Cash grab, used a template and called it a day”