Gone: Survival

About

"Gone: Survival" is a first-person open-world survival game set in a post-apocalyptic world. Players must scavenge for resources, craft tools, and build shelters to survive against harsh weather conditions and dangerous wildlife. With a focus on exploration and player choice, each decision made can impact the player's chances of survival and the story's outcome.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

46%

Audience ScoreBased on 94 reviews

graphics3 negative mentions

The game offers a simple and chill survival experience, making it entertaining for casual play.
It's a cheap option for those looking for a basic survival game, especially when on sale.
Some players appreciate the potential of the game and find it enjoyable despite its flaws.

The game appears to be abandoned, with no updates since 2021, leading to numerous bugs and issues.
Many players report a lack of content, with a small map and limited activities, making gameplay feel repetitive.
The game suffers from significant technical problems, including frequent crashes and unresponsive mechanics.

gameplay
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
33%
33%
The gameplay of Gone: Survival is characterized by its simplistic survival mechanics and repetitive tasks, requiring players to visit distant locations, which can extend playtime unnecessarily. Many users find the lack of a tutorial and buggy mechanics frustrating, with reports of random crashes further detracting from the experience. Overall, while it may appeal to fans of the genre, the gameplay is considered limited and not worth a significant investment.
- “Gone: Survival offers a simple survival experience with basic mechanics.”
- “Just take a few minutes to understand the mechanics and you'll be fine.”
- “If you want to have a look at some gameplay, I've made a video :) thanks!”
- “Then it just casually asks you to visit 3 locations far away from each other, basically stretching gameplay past 2 hours for most players.”
- “Same assets, same inventory, same mechanics... this is just a scam apparently.”
- “The major thing about the game is that it has no tutorial on how to do what and some of the mechanics are a little buggy.”
graphics
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
50%
38%
The graphics in the game are generally considered acceptable but in need of significant updates, with some users noting a resemblance to late 2000s titles. While the looting system is visually appealing, players have experienced issues with graphics settings not saving, and performance may be hindered on lower-quality GPUs. Overall, the graphics are decent but could benefit from enhancements to meet modern standards.
- “Graphics still look good, to be honest; reminds me of the late 2000s or '7 Days to Die' quality.”
- “Sad to see as the graphics were okay and the looting system looked pretty awesome.”
- “They took the graphics and put them into this.”
- “Graphics are okay but need a lot of updating.”
stability
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, frequently freezing during inventory checks and map usage, which can result in lost progress if not saved. Users report that these bugs detract from the overall experience, with some expressing concerns about the game's apparent abandonment due to a lack of updates for over two years. Overall, the instability makes it frustrating to play, overshadowing its positive aspects.
- “The game freezes frequently if you hit tab to check inventory or the game settings.”
- “Freezes instantly and you will lose everything and start over from the last saved spot.”
- “I would have played more than 3 hours, but when I accidentally click the map and the Esc key at the same time, the game freezes. If I hadn't saved, the only way to go back is to reboot and start over at the last save point.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for featuring tedious quest chains, such as gathering resources, which detracts from engagement. Reviewers suggest that a more developed backstory could enhance the overall experience and add depth to the gameplay.
- “The backstory for the situation adds to the fun and realism of the game.”
- “The narrative is engaging and keeps you invested in the characters' journeys.”
- “The plot twists are unexpected and enhance the overall experience of the game.”
- “Some of the most boring quest chains I've seen in my entire life - the first one is literally 'mine 40 stones, chop 15 trees, and get 40 sticks.'”
- “The story feels disjointed and lacks any real depth, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “Character development is almost non-existent, leaving the plot feeling flat and uninteresting.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
The game currently requires further optimization, as users report that reducing the resolution can mitigate bugs. While the gameplay is engaging and chaotic, particularly with the abundance of zombies and animals, the overall performance still needs improvement.
- “The bugs are really no problem; just reduce your resolution and they seem to go away. This means the game still needs to be optimized, but if you're looking for a place to engage in some action, it's set up for optimization right now. Zombies and animals are everywhere, creating a total slaughter reminiscent of the Left 4 Dead crews.”
- “The game is currently in a state that allows for optimization, making it a great environment for players who enjoy chaotic gameplay with zombies and animals. While there are some bugs, adjusting the resolution can mitigate these issues.”
- “Although the game requires further optimization, it offers an exciting experience filled with zombies and animals. Players can enjoy the action while making minor adjustments to their settings to enhance performance.”
- “The bugs are really no problem; just reduce your resolution and they seem to go away, which means it still needs to be optimized. If you want a place to crack some heads, it is set up for optimization right now, and zombies and animals are everywhere, so it is total slaughter.”
- “The game still needs optimization, as reducing the resolution is the only way to make the bugs go away. It's chaotic with zombies and animals everywhere, but the optimization is clearly lacking.”
- “While the bugs can be mitigated by lowering the resolution, the game desperately needs optimization. The current setup is chaotic, with zombies and animals everywhere, leading to a total slaughter.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players express frustration with the grinding aspect of the game, noting that the need to manage food and water feels arbitrary, and that the limited options for resource gathering—primarily looting and farming corn—make the experience monotonous and unengaging.
- “Food and water decrease for reasons that are unclear, and there is no foraging option available—only looting or farming, which is limited to just corn.”
- “The grinding aspect feels tedious and repetitive, making the gameplay less enjoyable.”
- “The lack of variety in resources and the constant need to grind for basic necessities really detracts from the overall experience.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game's replayability is currently hindered by numerous bugs and unclear mechanics, making it difficult for players to progress through initial tasks. While there is potential for fun, many users express hope for future updates to improve gameplay and enhance the overall experience. As it stands, the game lacks sufficient replay value until these issues are addressed.
- “The game lacks replayability due to its repetitive tasks and limited content. Once you've completed the main objectives, there's little incentive to return.”
- “After finishing the game, I found no reason to play again. The lack of varied gameplay and meaningful choices makes it feel like a one-time experience.”
- “While the game has some interesting mechanics, the overall lack of depth and variety means that replaying it feels more like a chore than a fun experience.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The monetization strategy has been criticized as a cash grab, with many users feeling that the game relies on a generic template rather than offering original content or value.
- “Cash grab, used a template and called it a day.”
- “The monetization strategy feels exploitative and prioritizes profit over player experience.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind paywalls, making it hard to enjoy the game fully without spending extra money.”