Automobilista 2

About

Automobilista 2 is a single player and multiplayer racing game. It was developed by Reiza Studios and was released on June 30, 2020. It received very positive reviews from players.

"Automobilista 2" is a racing simulation game that offers a wide range of cars and tracks, with a focus on Brazilian motorsport. The game features advanced physics and graphics, as well as dynamic weather and track conditions. Players can compete in various racing disciplines, including stock cars, open-wheel, and endurance racing, with a career mode and multiplayer options available.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+38

Skip User Reviews

90%

Audience ScoreBased on 6,344 reviews

graphics587 positive mentions

stability65 negative mentions

Automobilista 2 offers a vast variety of cars and tracks, including unique Brazilian motorsport content, making it a diverse racing experience.
The game features excellent graphics and a strong physics engine, providing an immersive driving experience, especially in VR.
The AI is competitive and engaging, allowing for enjoyable single-player racing against intelligent opponents.

The game lacks a career mode, which many players find disappointing, and the multiplayer experience can be inconsistent with a small player base.
Some players report issues with controller support and wheel setup, making it difficult for casual gamers to enjoy the game fully.
There are concerns about the game's physics feeling floaty or unrealistic at times, particularly with certain car classes.

graphics
934 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
63%
35%
2%
The graphics in Automobilista 2 are widely praised for their stunning visuals and optimization, often described as among the best in the sim racing genre, particularly in VR. Many users appreciate the detailed car models, dynamic weather effects, and the game's ability to run smoothly on lower-end hardware. However, some critiques mention that while the graphics are impressive, they may not reach the level of the latest titles like Assetto Corsa Competizione, and there are occasional issues with texture quality and performance under certain conditions. Overall, the game strikes a good balance between visual fidelity and performance, making it a strong contender in the racing sim market.
- “The graphics are stunning, with realistic cars, tracks, and dynamic weather that make every race feel alive.”
- “The graphics are easily on par if not better than any more modern titles; the cars look and sound truly amazing.”
- “The graphics are beautiful, with jaw-dropping weather effects and a great attention to detail.”
- “The graphics are reasonably good, not great, worse than Le Mans Ultimate and Forza Motorsport, and much worse than Forza Horizon 5.”
- “Awkward, floaty, unresponsive steering on all configs, 2005-tier graphics even at max settings, really limited set of cars and liveries without DLC, idiotic AI for opponents in singleplayer, overall: garbage.”
- “The graphics are ugly, but that wouldn't matter if the gameplay was good; I'd rather play Toca Touring Car than this thing.”
optimization
325 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
64%
34%
2%
Overall, the optimization of Automobilista 2 is highly praised, with many users noting its excellent performance across a range of hardware, including older systems. The game is particularly lauded for its VR capabilities, delivering smooth frame rates and impressive graphics without significant performance drops, even in demanding scenarios. However, some players have reported issues with multiplayer performance and occasional frame rate drops during specific conditions, such as night racing or heavy rain.
- “Great visuals, well optimized and a nice array of tracks and cars to choose from.”
- “The optimization is another level and the graphics are one of the best and the overall textures very clear and sharp and has super long draw distance too.”
- “The game is very well optimized and tyre model is decent, but a little floaty.”
- “Ever since the latest major update, the multiplayer performance of the game has gotten so drastically bad with micro-stuttering that it renders it unplayable.”
- “The v1.6 update feels better than before, but is slightly less optimized.”
- “Beware the poor performance; even at minimum settings, the framerate is jumpy.”
gameplay
132 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
64%
3%
The gameplay of the game is widely praised for its realism, engaging mechanics, and depth, allowing players to experience distinct driving characteristics across various cars. Users appreciate the detailed physics, customizable race settings, and the immersive feel of racing, although some express concerns about certain quality-of-life issues and the need for further development in gameplay modes. Overall, it is considered a top-tier racing simulator that offers a rewarding experience for both casual and hardcore racing fans.
- “Now talking about the game, it is currently my favorite sim, a lot of cars with unique features apart from sound and visuals, which are also pretty nailed, but the best part is how two cars from the same category and basically the same stats are way too different when it comes to driving them. You can notice steering, suspension weight distribution, engine power, braking capabilities, and aero of each car, so there is a lot to explore about mechanics in this game.”
- “The experience of driving a car in this game is just extremely visceral. The cacophony of sounds, the feel of the car itself, the mechanical and physical damage models, and probably the best AI of any current racing game all contribute to a religious experience for any racing fan.”
- “Was very impressed with the gameplay, felt really smooth and easy to control. The selection of cars was also very impressive, and I could see myself spending hours on end experimenting with all the cars, tracks, and weather.”
- “If this game is to thrive, the gameplay and game modes need to be addressed.”
- “So many game-breaking bugs, incomplete basic interface and gameplay elements, very patchy car models, etc., the list of issues for a full release game was just inexcusable.”
- “Driving mechanics are so bad.”
stability
94 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
69%
The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent bugs, freezes, and glitches that disrupt gameplay. While it runs well on various hardware configurations, including VR and lower-end PCs, the persistent issues with multiplayer lobbies, UI navigation, and control mapping detract from the overall experience. Despite its potential and enjoyable core racing mechanics, the game's current state is described as a "buggy mess," leading to frustration for players.
- “Runs great in VR, very smooth even on mid settings for mid graphics cards.”
- “Awesome selection of cars and tracks, and with the new LFM integration, for me it's the most fun racing sim at the moment. It runs great on lower to mid-end PCs.”
- “This sim looks great, runs great, has really good AI to race against, modern and historic content, multi-class racing, day-night cycles, wet weather, seasons, real weather, and a ton of other features that make it really hard to beat.”
- “The game is a buggy mess.”
- “Unfortunately, the game is extremely buggy.”
- “Worst game I've ever played, incredibly buggy and unplayable; I can't get through one session without a game-breaking bug.”
story
73 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
69%
12%
The game currently lacks a single-player story mode or career progression, which many players find disappointing, especially those who enjoyed similar features in previous titles. While the gameplay and VR experience are praised, the absence of a narrative element is noted as a significant drawback, with hopes that developers will introduce a story mode in future updates. Overall, the focus remains heavily on racing mechanics rather than storytelling.
- “It is here that the game has its sins, because unlike PC2, it hasn't any story or career mode... yet... to be honest, I miss that aspect of PC2, of being able to create a pilot and ascend into the various racing categories... it felt like I was a motorsport driver. When I performed well, the team congratulated me; when I performed poorly, the team scolded me. This aspect, although not essential, is a very nice part of PC2 that Reiza is capable of implementing in the future.”
- “Good game if you like sim racing or you just started your race story.”
- “If it had a more organized multiplayer, as well as some kind of campaign or story, or progression mode... damn near perfect.”
- “☑ no story”
- “Keep in mind though, this game is (at the day of this review, devs plan to add one at a later date) not for someone who looks for a career mode or even a storyline.”
- “It is here that the game has its sins, because unlike PC2, it hasn't any story or career mode... yet... I miss that aspect of PC2, of being able to create a pilot and ascend into the various racing categories... it felt like I was a motorsport driver. When I performed well, the team congratulated me; when I performed poorly, the team scolded me. This aspect, although not essential, is a very nice part of PC2 that Reiza is capable of implementing in the future.”
humor
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
94%
6%
The humor in Automobilista 2 is derived from its chaotic crash physics and the often absurd behavior of AI drivers, leading to moments of unexpected hilarity during gameplay. Players find amusement in the game's inconsistencies, such as unrealistic car handling and the exaggerated effects of collisions, which can turn frustrating situations into comedic experiences. While some bugs can detract from the fun, the overall experience is marked by a lighthearted approach to racing mishaps, making it enjoyable for players who appreciate a humorous take on simulation racing.
- “Game is funny because the crash physics are awesome and you can ram into people and watch their car explode into a million pieces in public lobbies.”
- “Hilarious to observe the AI 'race' each other - just side bumping each other the whole race without either crashing due to the ridiculous weight of their cars.”
- “Especially collisions and flips cause the engine to completely freak out and produce hilarious and unrealistic crashes.”
- “It is the most inconsistent racing game when it comes to braking the cars, so developers need to fix that bug because it's not funny.”
grinding
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
53%
35%
Reviews indicate that grinding in the game can be excessively tedious, often requiring significant time investment without substantial rewards. While some players appreciate the physics and driving mechanics, many find the lack of engaging progression systems and the repetitive nature of tasks detracts from the overall experience. Overall, the grinding aspect is seen as a major hurdle, with some players humorously suggesting it demands a "second life" to manage.
- “There's no winner's podium shot, no 'career' mode or managing a team, no spilling champagne while a voluptuous blonde hugs you, etc. but the physics and the responsive driving overcome any such shortcoming in my opinion, and there are no unlocks and no grinding; you get access to everything from the start.”
- “A bit grindy... sometimes.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Having to hover over one selection for a few seconds doesn't sound horrible, but lends itself to being rather tedious.”
- “It has no career mode and setting up the championship is tedious and has no rewards in the way of interviews, post-match summary/celebration/cutscenes of any kind, radio chat, etc.”
music
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
54%
23%
The music in the game is praised for its immersive quality, enhancing the racing atmosphere with cheering crowds and a dynamic soundtrack. While the main menu music has received positive feedback, some players feel that the overall selection could be improved, particularly by incorporating more catchy tracks reminiscent of previous titles like Project CARS 2. Overall, the developers are commended for their attention to detail in the audio experience, though there is a desire for a broader and more engaging musical variety.
- “The sounds are amazing and the atmosphere really gives that immersion that you're in an actual race with all the crowds cheering, the music playing in the background, and the overall environment of the track feels immersive.”
- “I play this game along with rFactor 2, Assetto Corsa, and Assetto Corsa Competizione, and you can see the love the developers are putting into this game; everything from the music, graphics, and physics are top notch.”
- “The soundtrack of that V10 (Formula V10) along with the view when I started my first practice session gave me goosebumps.”
- “However: 1) opening screen/music uninspiring.”
- “Kmart keyboard synthesizer level music.”
- “We need more music there, preferably something catchy like the Spa theme PC2 has... I don't know if they'll manage to top PC2 in regards to this topic, because the music of that game is sublime... but they can get close, if they contract a good musician for it.”
monetization
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
31%
46%
The monetization practices in the game have drawn mixed reviews, with many players criticizing the reliance on microtransactions and the rebranding of previously purchased content as a cash grab. While some appreciate the absence of subscriptions and find value in the game's updates, others feel that the pricing for additional tracks and content is excessive and anti-consumer. Overall, the monetization approach has led to frustration among players who feel it detracts from the game's quality and experience.
- “No subscriptions or microtransactions.”
- “It's a monetization system that I am okay with.”
- “And coming from rFactor 2, the physics still leave much to be desired, but the overall quality of life changes and free additions coming every month, the care and value that Reiza places in their customers are, in my opinion, much more worth it than the absolute nothingness regarding customer friendliness of other sims like iRacing, rFactor 2, and RaceRoom, whose respective companies milk this niche market with ancient products and monetizations that make even AAA companies sweat like there's no tomorrow.”
- “An okay game, or should I say a good game, but spoiled by increasingly terrible monetization practices.”
- “Their new monetization low is trying to re-sell the Nurburgring pack, rebranding it as '2025', not even blushing or giving a discount to the suckers who bought the original pack under the season pass or standalone.”
- “First, the monetization scheme is 'I give you the game almost free, but it costs to get any new track.' Not even bundles; having 3 layouts does not justify buying a track at 5 euros. I do not care that it is the 'old' layout so you can pretend to play classic cars.”
emotional
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a range of emotional responses to the game, from joy and nostalgia triggered by the engine sounds to frustration and trauma caused by unrealistic car physics and AI behavior. While some appreciate the realistic feel of the cars on the road, others are left feeling overwhelmed by the game's mechanics and the emotional toll of competitive racing. Overall, the emotional experience is a mix of happiness and disappointment, highlighting the game's potential for both connection and frustration.
- “The sound of the engine while in third person mode made me cry of happiness.”
- “All the cars finally feel like cars, and like they are actually touching the road.”
- “I will be talking to my lawyers regarding emotional damages and trauma.”
atmosphere
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
25%
25%
The atmosphere in the game is highly praised for its immersive qualities, featuring realistic sound design, detailed weather effects, and vibrant crowd interactions that enhance the racing experience. Players appreciate the attention to detail, such as the lighting and visual effects around the track, which contribute to a sense of being part of a significant racing event. However, some users noted that the menu sounds can be disruptive, detracting from the overall atmosphere.
- “The sounds are amazing and the atmosphere really gives that immersion that you're in an actual race with all the crowds cheering, the music playing in the background, and the overall environment of the track feels immersive.”
- “Weather visuals, effects, and long-term track degradation is stellar, and adds a ton of atmosphere.”
- “The genre's most annoying menu atmosphere sounds; every minute or so you'll get ear-blasted with a passing car that's louder than anything else in the game and doesn't seem to match volume control.”
- “When you came along the pits, grandstands, or the start/finish line, everything was realistically lit up. You could see the flashes of spectators taking photos, etc. These little details accumulate into an immersive atmosphere that can really make you feel like you're racing in a great event that matters.”
replayability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
Overall, players highlight a significant increase in replayability due to improved UI and a diverse selection of cars and tracks, making the driving simulation enjoyable to revisit. However, some users express a contrasting opinion, citing a lack of replayability in certain aspects of the game.
- “Endless replayability and a nice change from AC.”
- “There is just endless replayability in this driving simulation!”
- “- zero replayability”
- “Most cars are fantastic to drive, and that combined with the variety of quality cars and tracks leads to a lot of replayability.”