Assetto Corsa Competizione

About

Assetto Corsa Competizione is a realistic GT World Challenge-based racing simulation, featuring official drivers, teams, cars, and circuits from the 2018 and 2019 seasons. The game boasts exceptional graphics, refined physics, and immersive night races using Unreal Engine 4. Multiplayer and single-player modes offer sprint, endurance, and 24-hour Spa races, while motion capture animation and improved tire and aerodynamic models enhance the overall driving experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+86

91%

Audience ScoreBased on 7,962 reviews

graphics716 positive mentions

optimization115 negative mentions

graphics
1,188 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
37%
3%
The graphics in Assetto Corsa Competizione are widely praised for their stunning realism and attention to detail, particularly in car models, weather effects, and dynamic lighting. However, many users note that the game is demanding on hardware, requiring a powerful PC to achieve optimal performance and visual fidelity, especially in VR. While the visuals are often described as some of the best in sim racing, there are also mentions of optimization issues and the need for extensive tweaking to achieve the desired graphical quality.
- “The graphics are stunning, absolutely stunning.”
- “The graphics, physics, and sound are all top-notch and the level of detail and customization that can be achieved is remarkable.”
- “The graphics are beautiful, car models are perfect right down to the interior.”
- “Had to reduce the graphics to PS2 levels to have a stable decent framerate (far worse performance than pretty much any other VR-capable racing sim).”
- “The in-car graphics are terrible and unless you're in the higher end of the CPU, have fun looking at a total of 56 pixels in the rear mirror and a whopping maybe 35 fps.”
- “The graphics look a little dated, arguably worse than titles 5 years older than this.”
optimization
412 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
53%
28%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many users highlighting significant issues, particularly in VR performance, which is often described as "atrocious" and requiring extensive tweaking to achieve playable frame rates. While some players report satisfactory performance on high-end systems, others struggle with stuttering and low frame rates even on capable hardware, indicating that the game is not well-optimized for VR compared to other racing sims. Overall, while graphical fidelity is praised, the game's performance, especially in VR, remains a major concern for many users.
- “I would love to see more optimizations so I can run VR on my RTX 3080, Intel 10700KF, 32 GB of DDR4, and Reverb G2; but with Crew Chief and the dynamic radar, it's my favorite way to race online.”
- “With updates, the VR performance has gotten better, but I fear with how the game is built, there is a kind of performance ceiling in Unreal Engine and its implementation.”
- “Kunos constantly improve the game by adding features & optimizing performance.”
- “The VR performance is absolutely terrible.”
- “Performance is atrocious, especially in VR.”
- “Don't purchase if you plan to play this with VR, VR optimization is absolutely garbage at the moment.”
gameplay
165 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
32%
67%
2%
The gameplay of this racing simulator is widely praised for its realism, engaging mechanics, and impressive graphics, making it a top choice for sim racing enthusiasts. Players appreciate the depth of the gameplay, including detailed car setups and a variety of racing conditions, although some note issues with AI behavior and multiplayer connectivity. Overall, the game offers a challenging yet rewarding experience, particularly for those willing to invest time in mastering its mechanics.
- “Personal favorite sim title for its phenomenal graphics and polish while still having fantastic gameplay, realism, and competition.”
- “It's the most fun all-around racing sim I've played in terms of being polished and having good visuals, fun races and mechanics, reasonable AI, and good physics.”
- “Awesome game, multiplayer is kind of lacking though and so is mods and lack of selection but the core mechanics are all perfect.”
- “The career mode itself feels a bit lackluster, not having much depth except for the typical championship race weekend style gameplay.”
- “Multiplayer keeps being an issue, but to be honest, every game with public lobbies has this: bad players, connection issues, etc.”
- “I contacted their support and their bot deemed my question/issue 'gameplay related' and answered my email automatically by saying 'gameplay related questions will not be answered'.”
stability
77 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
83%
The game's stability has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and freezes, particularly when using specific hardware setups like steering wheels. While some users have noted improvements and a generally smooth experience on high-end systems, others have experienced significant issues that hinder gameplay, especially in career mode and multiplayer. Overall, the game is seen as a work in progress, with potential for improvement through future updates.
- “Fantastic GT3 sim - looks great, runs great, tightly skill-based, tire model works really well, and setups are very adjustable and satisfying.”
- “I do really enjoy this game; it runs great at 6000x1440 on RX 5700 XT with 3900X.”
- “New tire model is a lot more forgiving but still feels realistic on the limit; easy purchase and runs great in VR.”
- “Playing on PC with G29 wheel, multiple issues and game freezes as you get into the car after loading. Tried all forums with no success.”
- “Almost half the time I launch the game, it freezes my PC (for overnight+) forcing a PC unplug.”
- “This game is buggy as all hell; the lag spikes and crashing make it a pain to play.”
story
58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
69%
17%
The game lacks a traditional story, with most reviews highlighting that it primarily consists of a series of races against AI without any narrative elements, cutscenes, or character development. While some players appreciate the career progression and racing mechanics, many express a desire for a more engaging story mode to enhance the overall experience. Overall, the focus remains heavily on gameplay rather than storytelling.
- “I wish it had a more colorful and engaging story mode.”
- “Great GT3 simulator with a nice selection of cars and tracks. The DLCs are surely worth it; the career mode is nice, though I'd like them to include some story in it next time. Still not bad.”
- “There looks to be a really neat story with you starting as a driver in Super Trofeo and then earning your way into competition.”
- “There's not really a story, just a series of races playable in singleplayer against AI with the vague setting of a racing season.”
- “The career is dull and not very long; you just do practice, qualifying, and race at each track with no cutscenes or storyline.”
- “The story sucks and the characters too.”
atmosphere
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
28%
12%
The atmosphere in the game is widely praised for its immersive and realistic qualities, enhanced by stunning graphics, exceptional sound design, and dynamic environmental effects. Players appreciate the engaging racing ambiance, particularly during competitive play, with detailed audio that captures the essence of real racing experiences. Overall, the game successfully creates a captivating atmosphere that elevates the driving experience, especially in VR and during varied weather conditions.
- “Fantastic realism, and atmosphere.”
- “Driving experience is superb and the atmosphere created by the sounds and graphics make me feel I'm truly sitting in a race car.”
- “Not only are the engine sounds really satisfying and close to what I hear during onboard videos, but the atmospheric sounds like rocks hitting under the cars, background interview over the PA while waiting to start a race parked on the grid, to scrapes and gearbox whines and clunks... just awesome.”
- “The main difference between this and Assetto Corsa is the competitiveness of Competizione, while Assetto is much more of a 'chill with your friends' type of atmosphere; this one is a 'race against other players to win' type of feel.”
- “What the game lacks in atmosphere in the UI (I don't know, but the UI screams 'this is a game' everywhere for me, I would much prefer a very old school UI with real GT pictures in the back as GP2 or GPL), it does more than make up once in game.”
- “This game has an atmosphere (especially in VR) that I haven't felt in other titles (not even AC).”
grinding
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
56%
33%
Players frequently express that grinding in the game is a time-consuming and often tedious process, requiring significant effort to achieve competitive setups and progress. Many suggest that it feels like one would need "a second life" to fully engage with the grinding aspects, highlighting the challenge and commitment involved. While some appreciate the authenticity and rewards of the grind, others find it frustrating and overly demanding.
- “A bit grindy sometimes.”
- “A bit grindy...sometimes.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The game can become tedious to become competitive because to get the cars set up perfectly for every track takes a lot of time and consistent driving.”
- “It is tedious and takes adjustment like any sim, but in terms of feel and authenticity, this is it.”
humor
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is described as hit-or-miss, with some players finding amusement in quirky moments and glitches, while others feel the humor is overshadowed by gameplay frustrations. Many comments highlight funny coincidences and amusing aspects of the game's design, but there are also critiques about the lack of engaging humor during intense gameplay. Overall, the humor seems to be a mixed bag, providing some light-hearted moments amidst a more serious racing experience.
- “That's not a lot, but it's funny that it happened twice.”
- “It still was a funny coincidence if I look back.”
- “Some hilarious glitches but overall exactly what I expected.”
music
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
42%
25%
The music aspect of the game receives mixed reviews; while some players enjoy the raw and visceral engine sounds, they find the in-game soundtrack lacking, often recommending external music like eurobeat mixes to enhance the experience. The menu music is noted as enjoyable, but overall, the absence of a built-in racing soundtrack leaves some players wanting more.
- “While playing, I highly recommend you listen to some eurobeat mixes or some Need for Speed music by Rom Di Prisco; it'll really add to the experience.”
- “It's also a pleasure to listen to the car's soundtrack.”
- “Hardcore, brutal, visceral with an amazing engine soundtrack.”
- “The visuals are good (especially for night racing), it has fair audio, but average music.”
- “☐ what soundtrack?”
- “Sound is impressive too, giving you a very raw, noisy soundtrack throughout.”
emotional
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a strong emotional connection to the game, feeling immersed in the role of a GT driver and appreciating the depth of challenges like endurance racing. However, frustrations arise from technical issues, such as poor physics and a lack of multiplayer engagement, which detract from the overall experience. The emotional highs of racing are often tempered by these shortcomings, leading to a mixed sentiment among users.
- “The 24-hour racing is the most I loved... it tests my skill, endurance, patience, and even tire punctures make for the most emotional racing ever.”
- “I have been racing online with Assetto Corsa from .3 beta and have ridden the emotional roller coaster of development over the next few years. I have over 2800 hours of racing on Assetto and have completed none of the challenges, and I can't ever recall racing against the AI.”
- “It made me feel like I'm a GT driver.”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Reviews indicate a strong dissatisfaction with the monetization strategies of certain racing games, particularly criticizing iRacing for its perceived predatory practices. In contrast, some players appreciate the straightforward approach of Assetto Corsa, which limits purchases to what is available on Steam, though concerns about misleading marketing and in-game advertising persist. Overall, there is a sentiment that monetization often detracts from the core gameplay experience.
- “Simple, no more in-game purchases; just what you buy on Steam, and that's it.”
- “The monetization model is straightforward and fair, allowing players to enjoy the game without constant upselling.”
- “iRacing employs the most ridiculously predatory monetization strategy in gaming.”
- “At the time, it seemed like just another cash grab, akin to all the PCARS titles we now have from Slightly Mad or whomever.”
- “So instead of making the game playable and delivering the core gameplay they promised, they are already investing their time in cash grabbing.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
While the absence of mods in ACC is noted, players feel that the game's overall quality, especially with the base game and all DLC, provides substantial replay value. The addition of racing against real people significantly enhances the experience, making it much more engaging and enjoyable, contributing to its high replayability.
- “Unlike AC1, ACC doesn't support mods, but the overall quality of the game makes up for the lack of mods in my opinion. If you get the base game plus all DLC, there's enough replay value to keep you occupied for a long time.”
- “Racing real people adds so much more depth and complexity to races that it's a night-and-day difference when it comes to replayability and enjoyment.”
- “Cool cars and amazing vibes make this game replayable twenty times over.”
- “Unlike AC1, AC doesn't support mods, which limits its replayability. While the overall quality of the game is high, the lack of mod support makes it feel less engaging over time.”
- “The game offers a decent amount of content, but once you've completed the main story and side quests, there's little incentive to return. The replay value is quite low.”
- “After finishing the game, I found that there wasn't much left to explore or experience. The replayability factor is disappointing, as it feels like a one-and-done experience.”