Autocraft
- September 20, 2017
- Alientrap
- 2h median play time
Get on Steam"Autocraft" is a single-player simulation game with stunning visuals, offering around 2 hours of playtime. Create and customize your own vehicles using over 100 parts, from rocket thrusters to buzzsaws, and test them in 37 challenge levels or a sandbox mode. The game also allows you to collect mineral ore and unlock new parts while exploring unique worlds. Additionally, a wiring system lets you tweak each individual part of your vehicle for precise control.
Mac OS
PC
Windows
Reviews
- The game offers a lot of creativity and allows players to build various vehicles, which can be fun and engaging.
- It has a nostalgic value for some players, evoking fond memories of their childhood and creativity.
- The sandbox mode provides a space for players to experiment and create without strict limitations.
- The game has been largely abandoned by developers, leading to a lack of updates and support, which diminishes its potential.
- Many players find the gameplay repetitive and boring after a short time, with limited content and objectives.
- The physics and controls are often criticized as being poorly implemented, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences.
- gameplay22 mentions
- 18 % positive mentions
- 45 % neutral mentions
- 36 % negative mentions
Gameplay reviews are mixed, with some players praising the addictive nature and impressive physics, while others criticize mechanical flaws, lag, and a lack of multiplayer options. Many comparisons are made to games like Scrap Mechanic and Kerbal Space Program, highlighting both the potential and frustrations of the mechanics. Overall, the game seems to appeal to younger audiences but may leave more experienced players feeling disappointed.
“Amazing physics, and addictive gameplay and graphics make you constantly come back to search for more ways to master this wondrous game.”
“If that happens too often, I call it 'guess the dev's solution!!!' gameplay - luckily this game largely avoids it.”
“This game is great for all who loved the gameplay from Banjo, Nuts and Bolts; simple and fun, can't wait for multiplayer.”
“This game is the worst, the game lags and gameplay sucks, 1 out of 5 stars.”
“This game has a lot of potential but falls short numerous times on the mechanics which makes me unable to recommend it.”
“Terrible game, the physics are shocking, gameplay is jumpy, for a game that relies on physics as its forefront image it does not feel fun at all, just frustrating as it controls poorly. Don't waste your $10 on this game.”
- graphics20 mentions
- 70 % positive mentions
- 10 % neutral mentions
- 20 % negative mentions
The game's graphics receive mixed reviews, with many praising its unique and minimalist art style, while others criticize the overall quality and optimization, noting issues like slow performance and mediocre visuals. Despite these drawbacks, some players find the graphics complement the addictive gameplay and physics, enhancing their overall experience.
“Amazing physics, and addictive gameplay and graphics make you constantly come back to search for more ways to master this wondrous game.”
“Nice simple art style which suits the game well.”
“Graphics might be simple but the fun is beyond epic.”
“The game's performance is solid, but its graphics are mediocre.”
“Bad graphics.”
“Weird graphics/rendering.”
- stability18 mentions
- 11 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 89 % negative mentions
Overall, the game's stability has improved significantly, with many users noting that it is no longer the "buggy, unplayable mess" it once was. While some glitches still persist, recent updates have reduced their frequency, leading to a more enjoyable experience. Players express optimism for further improvements, indicating that the game is on the right track despite still being in alpha.
“I've been playing this game for about an hour, and honestly, it's pretty good. There is definitely room for improvement and there could be a lot more added, but yes, I would recommend this game. I thought it would be a lot buggier than it was, but it's not that buggy!”
“Was one of my favorite games until it got updated to Unity 5; at that point, I deleted the game almost instantly from my personal library because of all of the glitches.”
“It has a lot of glitches, but if they fix that, this game would be so much fun.”
“Good game, although not without glitches.”
- music16 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 25 % negative mentions
The music in the game is described as peaceful and calming, appealing to those who enjoy serene soundscapes. However, many users find the soundtrack repetitive and lacking originality, with some considering it stock-like. Overall, while the music enhances the experience for some, it may not be engaging enough for others.
“Incredibly peaceful music.”
“Honestly, to anyone who likes calm music, beautiful environment, and hours and hours of fun, action (because yes, a rocket does go fast), and a lot of thinking (these damn stars are hard to get!), this game is for you.”
“Great soundtrack.”
“Very bad game; the vocal stirring is horrible and the music is even worse.”
“The soundtrack and sound effects aren't the best.”
“After one and a half hours, I took a break; the soundtrack gets very repetitive.”
- optimization6 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 33 % neutral mentions
- 67 % negative mentions
The game's optimization is generally criticized, with reports of poor performance, especially during intense moments like artillery fire, which can lead to significant slowdowns. While some players appreciate the minimalist graphics style, they feel the game has not been adequately optimized, resulting in a sluggish experience despite its mediocre visual quality.
“Awful performance; after you fire some artillery, the particle effects will kill your brain.”
“The graphics are minimalist; I like the style, but the game has not been optimized and runs quite slowly for its appearance.”
“The game's performance is solid, but its graphics are mediocre.”
- story6 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The game lacks a substantial story, with users noting that it feels almost non-existent. Instead, the focus appears to be on gameplay mechanics and mission objectives rather than narrative development.
“Well, the story, or rather it doesn't really have one of those.”
“The narrative feels disjointed and lacks depth.”
“There is little to no character development throughout the game.”
- humor4 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Players find the humor in the game to be lighthearted and enjoyable, likening it to the comedic elements of "Besiege." The game's quirky challenges and the ability to create various vehicles add to its fun, making it a delightful experience for those who appreciate a humorous take on physics-based gameplay.
“This funny little space sandbox game is just like Besiege!”
“Autocraft is a funny little challenging game where you need some practice in physics. You can build many vehicles, and I hope there will be bigger maps, multiplayer for some fun with friends, level editor, etc.”
- emotional2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Players express a strong emotional connection to the game, particularly when rediscovering it in their old PC gaming library, highlighting feelings of nostalgia and sentimentality.
“It was honestly a bit emotional coming back to PC gaming and finding this game from my old library.”
- grinding2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Many users find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and repetitive, leading to a sense of frustration over time.
“After a while, the tediousness won.”
- replayability2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Players note that the developer's active engagement in improving game mechanics, particularly wheel physics, enhances the overall experience, contributing to a fun and replayable gameplay.
