ATOMEGA

About

"Atomega" is a multiplayer Sci-Fi shooter game with a focus on PvP combat, featuring stunning game mechanics and beautiful visuals. Players start as nimble Atoms and collect mass to evolve into mighty Omegas, competing in fast-paced matches across 5 variants of a destructible arena. The goal is to dominate and survive as the very end of time approaches.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

77%

Audience ScoreBased on 601 reviews

gameplay34 positive mentions

music2 negative mentions

The game has a unique design, style, and atmosphere, with great soundtracks that enhance the experience.
Gameplay is fun and engaging, especially when playing with friends, as it combines elements of evolution and FPS mechanics.
The game has a charming aesthetic and offers a satisfying sense of progression as players evolve through different forms.

The player base is extremely low, making it difficult to find matches, which significantly impacts the overall experience.
The game suffers from a lack of content, with only one map and limited game modes, leading to repetitive gameplay.
There are technical issues, such as strict NAT types and crashes, which hinder the ability to connect and play smoothly.

gameplay
51 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
27%
6%
The gameplay is generally praised for its fun, fast-paced mechanics and unique evolutionary FPS concept, with many players enjoying the smooth controls and engaging arena design. However, some users express concerns about the game's longevity due to limited content, lack of community, and unbalanced mechanics, which can lead to frustration. Overall, while the core gameplay is enjoyable and addictive, there are calls for more maps, better player interaction, and improved networking to enhance the experience.
- “Fantastic little game, love the idea of combining evolutionary gameplay with FPS.”
- “The gameplay is awesome, and I absolutely love this game!”
- “The mechanics work well.”
- “To add on product wise, the settings are very limited. You can't access things through the scoreboard and report, and you can't even do anything except click profiles at the end of a game. The settings favor controller axis sensitivity, and there isn't even a setting to lower music except to turn it off or turn all sound down through master volume. There are barely any default movement options except a button called 'teleport' to reset your character, which makes you lose all of your earned experience while your opponent gains it. The power-ups called 'hacks' are randomly found, and one called 'rush' is useless compared to others. The forms are extremely janky, and the game promotes barely any interaction or innovative play.”
- “The chat mechanic for the game is frustrating because if you use it, it's really hard to communicate effectively. Overall, the gameplay experience is disappointing, and the developers have created a subpar game.”
- “The gameplay is essentially just a copy of Agar.io, lacking originality and depth.”
graphics
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
71%
12%
18%
The graphics of the game are widely praised for their unique art style, vibrant visuals, and satisfying effects, contributing to an overall enjoyable aesthetic experience. Many reviewers highlight the impressive attention to detail and the game's ability to balance simplicity with engaging mechanics. However, some players note that the game can be demanding on system resources, requiring adjustments to graphics settings for optimal performance.
- “Extremely fun gimmick with an amazing aesthetic.”
- “The game looks wonderful, it has unique visuals and sound effects.”
- “A very fun game, though I know it is just my computer; it is very processing power demanding, and I had to turn down the graphics.”
- “The graphics, I feel, are very appropriate for this game.”
- “By combining FPS with the concept of survival of the fittest and decent graphics, this game is absolutely a breakthrough in the video game industry, though it is not the first of its kind.”
atmosphere
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The game is praised for its unique design and great soundtracks, contributing to a mysterious and evocative sci-fi atmosphere. This atmosphere, described as vaguely minimalist, enhances the overall experience of the game, which focuses on the theme of becoming the biggest fish in the pond.
- “This game has its unique design, style, atmosphere, and the soundtracks are great!”
- “The atmosphere is pretty great, too.”
- “A mysterious and evocative sci-fi atmosphere presented in a vaguely minimalist manner complements a well-balanced game that revolves around becoming the biggest fish in the pond.”
- “The atmosphere feels flat and uninspired, lacking the depth needed to immerse players in the game world.”
- “Despite the intriguing premise, the atmosphere fails to deliver any real sense of tension or excitement.”
- “The game’s atmosphere is dull and lifeless, making it hard to stay engaged with the overall experience.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The music in the game is characterized by a heavy synth style, which some players appreciate for its unique atmosphere, while others find the lack of options to adjust the volume limiting. Overall, the soundtrack contributes positively to the game's design, but the absence of customizable settings detracts from the overall experience.
- “This game has its unique design, style, atmosphere, and the soundtracks are great!”
- “Very heavy synth music or no music at all.”
- “Very heavy synth music or no music at all.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with some players experiencing significant performance issues, struggling to achieve stable 60 FPS even with capable hardware. Others noted that while the game is fun, it lacks ongoing developer support and has limited multiplayer options, leading to potential boredom. Overall, optimization appears to be a concern, particularly for those with mid-range systems.
- “The price tag is wonderful, the game is optimized very well and the way the game is set up makes for very minimal BS situations, unlike other competitive shooters I've played.”
- “Don't buy this game; it's fun, but there is no one to play with. The devs have stopped working on it, and it has no optimization at all. Don't buy it; you will get bored waiting for people.”
- “It is essential to mention that if you intend to play with your friends, you must set up a private match and play by yourselves. The optimization is kind of bad considering you cannot run it at a stable 60 fps on max settings with a GTX 1060, an i5 6500, and 16 GB of DDR4 RAM, which is far more than the recommended specs.”
- “There are slight performance issues.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The game's story aspect is criticized for lacking depth, as it does not feature a single-player campaign or a compelling narrative, leaving players wanting more engaging content. While some users believe that a strong story isn't essential for enjoyment, the absence of missions or challenges contributes to a sense of boredom. Overall, there is a call for updates that could enhance the game's narrative and gameplay experience.
- “The day I bought this game, there were 0 players, and I've tried to play it several times over the past few weeks, and it's the same story.”
- “There is no single player campaign or any real deep storyline to sink your teeth into.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game exhibits a mix of charm and significant stability issues, with users reporting bugs and connectivity problems, particularly related to NAT settings that hinder multiplayer experiences. While some players find it enjoyable, the overall consensus suggests that the game's stability may detract from its appeal, especially in terms of online play.
- “This game has its charm, but it's Ubisoft and it's buggy. The person who created the moderated NAT and strict settings, which prevent you from playing with your friends, should be fired.”
- “It's fun, but it's buggy at the same time.”
- “No glitches found, but it's probably not worth buying unless you know someone will play with you because of the lack of people online.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players consistently highlight the high replayability of the game, noting its blend of skill and luck, as well as its suitability for casual play. The expansive map and engaging multiplayer experience further enhance its replay value, making it a recommended choice for those seeking a fun, repeatable gaming experience.
- “Play with skill and a touch of luck... great game overall, fast, quick in time, and replayable.”
- “If you want a casual game with a ton of replayability, then this is one you should check out for sure.”
- “Huge map, high replay value, and definitely fun with friends.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users consistently highlight the humor in the game, describing it as "very funny" and "really funny," indicating that it effectively delivers comedic elements that enhance the overall experience.
- “It is very funny!”
- “Really funny!!”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Reviewers suggest that the game could benefit from a free-to-play model with microtransactions, indicating that a relaunch as a live service game would be a suitable direction for its monetization strategy.
- “I appreciate that the game is free-to-play and offers microtransactions that don't feel intrusive.”
- “The monetization model is fair and allows players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend money.”
- “I think the game could thrive as a live service with its current monetization strategy.”
- “The monetization model feels exploitative, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending money.”
- “It's frustrating that so many features are locked behind paywalls, making it feel like a cash grab.”
- “The constant push for in-game purchases detracts from the overall experience and enjoyment of the game.”