Armored Brigade II

About

Armored Brigade II is a single player strategy game. It was developed by Veitikka Studios and was released on April 8, 2025. It received positive reviews from players.

Building on the success of its acclaimed predecessor, Armored Brigade II elevates the wargaming experience by skillfully blending accessibility with tactical depthall within a new, more immersive 3D graphic landscape. This finely-tuned balance makes it an ideal choice for both newcomers and veterans of military wargames. Engage in a simulator that offers both pausable real-time and turn-based game…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

89%

Audience ScoreBased on 149 reviews

story9 positive mentions

optimization3 negative mentions

Armored Brigade II offers a deep and realistic tactical wargaming experience, with a focus on planning and execution that reflects real-world military operations.
The transition to 3D graphics significantly enhances situational awareness and line of sight visualization, making it easier to assess terrain and unit positioning.
The game features a robust scenario editor and mod support, allowing players to create and share custom campaigns and missions, which greatly increases replayability.

The AI can be inconsistent, sometimes failing to react effectively in combat situations, which can lead to frustrating gameplay experiences.
Graphics are considered low-resolution and may not appeal to players looking for high-fidelity visuals, potentially detracting from immersion.
The game lacks multiplayer options, which limits its appeal for players who enjoy competitive or cooperative gameplay with friends.

story
63 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
81%
5%
The story aspect of the game is centered around a Cold War-era wargame experience that combines elements from the Combat Mission series with enhanced accessibility and user-friendly features. Players can engage in a variety of missions, including single-player campaigns and user-generated scenarios, set across expansive maps that allow for strategic maneuvering and tactical depth. While the game may not boast cutting-edge graphics, its robust mission editor and replayability make it a compelling alternative for fans of tactical military strategy games.
- “Whether you're crafting your own what-if scenarios or diving into built-in missions, the replayability here is off the charts.”
- “The game has a lot of premade campaigns and single missions, and on top of that, it has a variety of huge maps that you can generate your own campaigns and missions.”
- “The battlescapes for these areas are huge as well; think of Squad 44 making the entire island of Iwo Jima to scale and then apply it to this game. The area that you can generate missions on is truly insane.”
- “I find myself approaching AB2 as I approach Combat Mission - but that will only lead to frustration and long order delays and other penalties.”
- “I don't even think they changed the mission names and maps.”
- “However, I couldn't figure out how to replicate this in the mission generator, which was a bit disappointing.”
graphics
45 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
76%
11%
The graphics of the game are generally described as low-resolution and simplistic, which may not appeal to everyone, but they serve their purpose in enhancing gameplay and immersion. While some players appreciate the functional 3D visuals that improve terrain navigation, others express a desire for graphical improvements to compete with more visually advanced titles. Overall, the consensus is that while the graphics are not a standout feature, they are adequate for the game's focus on tactical realism and gameplay depth.
- “The new 3D perspective helps immensely with figuring out sight lines, and while the graphics may be quite simple by the standards of other games, getting close to the action when the bullets start flying can be pretty immersive.”
- “The graphics may look bare at first, but the vehicles are quite cool, and the battlefield really comes alive with artillery, smoke, tank cannons, and airplanes; it is quite a sight.”
- “My only gripes are the crappy graphics, and like so many other matrix games, almost complete lack of marketing, which has led to a very small community, so there aren't many mods or even custom scenarios.”
- “Would love to see an improvement on land graphics.”
- “The graphics are low detail but that is part of the charm.”
gameplay
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
65%
12%
The gameplay is characterized by a slower pace and a focus on realism, incorporating detailed mechanics such as armor penetration, morale, and command delays, which require strategic planning and patience. While some players find the spotting mechanics and command system challenging, the game offers a rich simulation experience with well-researched units and improved features from its predecessor. Overall, it emphasizes tactical depth over fast-paced action, appealing to those who appreciate a more methodical approach to real-time strategy.
- “It builds on the original with smarter mechanics, expanded factions, and terrain that genuinely affects your tactics.”
- “Once you understand the game pace, units, and mechanics, you will have some of the best experiences, and it feels like an actual simulation of a real battle.”
- “This game features a similar mechanic by checking the 'player character' option during mission setup.”
- “It's not the first time that I've felt like the spotting mechanics seem odd.”
- “Because it was lacking the fundamental mechanics and quality of life improvements for me to enjoy the game.”
- “Overall, it's largely a transition of the game into 3D, with no significant changes to the core gameplay.”
optimization
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
45%
33%
Overall, the optimization of Armored Brigade II is generally praised for its accessibility and performance improvements over its predecessor, with a well-designed UI that enhances user experience. However, some users note that optimization may not be ideal for very low-end systems, and despite the game's focus on performance, there are still some unexpected drawbacks in optimization given its simplistic models.
- “Perhaps slightly less tactically dense than Combat Mission but enormously more accessible and more optimized.”
- “That said, it prioritizes performance, scale, and ease of use (such as significantly better UI design than any major game in this niche) over high fidelity graphics or extreme levels of micromanagement.”
- “It wasn't because the game shipped stable, well-optimized, and space efficient.”
- “However, there are some drawbacks: the optimization isn't the best, which is unexpected given the simplistic models, but it's manageable.”
- “Tl;dr: Armored Brigade II is in every way an improvement over the first game (with the possible exception of performance on very low-end systems, though I cannot comment on this as I am massively over recommended specs and have noticed no performance differences between the two games), but also makes small but meaningful changes beyond the 'flashiest' change of now being 3D.”
replayability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
60%
The game boasts exceptional replayability due to its vast playable map areas, random elements like weather and unit types, and a variety of scenarios and campaigns. Players can create self-generated scenarios, enhancing the experience further, while multiple difficulty options cater to both novices and veterans. Overall, the combination of these features provides nearly limitless replay value.
- “Endless replay value, not just based on the huge playable map areas, but also due to the randomness that can be injected in various ways: weather, unit types (including training and morale), primary objectives, and dummy objectives.”
- “Apart from the series of available scenarios and campaigns, the self-generated scenarios and campaigns with the huge choice of battlefields provide an amazing degree of replayability.”
- “Multiple difficulty options ensure that even a novice can play, contributing to almost unending replay value.”
- “Endless replay value, not just based on the huge playable map area(s), but also as randomness can be injected in various ways: weather, unit types (including training/morale), primary objectives, and dummy objectives.”
- “Multiple difficulty options so even a novice can play, and almost unending replay value.”
- “The potential for replayability is huge.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious, particularly due to the cumbersome command delay and the need to press multiple buttons to visualize line of sight. While the improved map layers enhance oversight compared to the previous game's top-down perspective, the overall experience can still feel laborious.
- “Very interesting war game, but I struggle to visualize line of sight and overall deal with the command delay. For me, the game is a bit too tedious. You would think you could easily visualize line of sight wherever you want the unit to move, but you have to press three buttons each time just to do it. You can switch map layers, however, to get a better overview.”
- “The first game had this top-down 2D perspective that totally disconnected you from what was going on in the field and made assessing terrain incredibly tedious, but all of that is now fixed.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is highly praised for its stability, running smoothly on various platforms, including the Steam Deck and even lower-end systems. Users highlight its polished performance, indicating a well-optimized experience.
- “Definitely recommend, and it runs great on the Steam Deck as well, FYI.”
- “It's incredibly polished, slick, and runs great on a potato.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's humor effectively contrasts the often romanticized notions of war, highlighting its complexities and harsh realities rather than presenting it as simple or noble.
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a desire for more ambient music in the game, indicating that the current soundtrack may not fully enhance the gaming experience.
- “One thing I would like is some more ambient music in the game.”