Archmage lite

About

Archmage lite is a single player action game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Archmage Lite is a casual, single-player card trading game that offers a simplified experience of strategic deck-building. While it captures the core mechanics of collecting and battling with cards, players should be aware that the game is currently full of bugs, which may affect gameplay. Despite its imperfections, it provides an accessible entry point for fans of card games.

Genres & Tags

Casual

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

73%

Audience ScoreBased on 384 reviews

gameplay3 positive mentions

stability17 negative mentions

Great adaptation of the classic Arcomage from Might and Magic, bringing back nostalgia for fans.
Fun and addictive gameplay with a good variety of cards and strategies.
Developer is responsive and actively working on fixing bugs and improving the game.

Frequent crashes and bugs make the game frustrating and unplayable at times.
Unbalanced gameplay where the AI often has an unfair advantage, leading to a lack of strategy.
Recent updates have introduced issues such as card visibility problems and forced closures, disappointing long-time players.

stability
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with frequent crashes and freezes reported during gameplay, particularly during AI matches and card interactions. While some users note that restarting the game can temporarily resolve these problems, the overall experience remains frustratingly buggy, detracting from the enjoyment of the game.
- “Love the game but way too buggy; can't save card sets, game 'forgets' to end when either side wins, keeps crashing at startup.”
- “It's a good game but it's really buggy.”
- “Freezes all the time during my turn.”
graphics
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
28%
43%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players expressing nostalgia for the original style while others find the current visuals laggy and uncomfortable. While a few appreciate the sharpness and fun factor, many agree that improvements are needed for a more modern high-resolution experience. Overall, the graphics seem to evoke a sense of longing for better quality and refinement.
- “Graphics are sharp and it offers hours of fun.”
- “I was looking for such a game; it needs better graphics for high resolution.”
- “The 90s called; they want their graphics back.”
- “Graphics are laggy and uncomfortable as hell.”
- “I was looking for such a game, but it needs better graphics for high resolution.”
gameplay
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
The gameplay is praised for its engaging mechanics reminiscent of Arcomage, featuring unique options for handling opponents' inactivity during their turns. Players appreciate the sound effects and the overall quality of the gameplay, likening it to a magic-themed experience. Overall, the development and gameplay have received positive feedback.
- “Great sound effects, same gameplay as Arcomage.”
- “The unique gameplay option is that if your opponent doesn't make a move during their turn, you can either choose to give them more time or choose not to, which can lead to quitting the game.”
- “Awesome gameplay.”
- “The weird gameplay option is that if your opponent doesn't make a move during their turn, you either choose to give them more time or choose not to, which makes you quit the game.”
- “Magic-esque gameplay”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express mixed feelings about monetization, with some pleasantly surprised by the lack of ads, while others are frustrated by the prevalence of lengthy video ads that disrupt gameplay, leading to a decline in enjoyment. Overall, the monetization strategy appears to detract from the gaming experience for many players.
- “The new video ads are the worst.”
- “30-second video ads are still on an endless loop about half of the time.”
- “No fun to play at all - it has gone from one of my favorite everyday games to an ineffective, boring advertisement.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express frustration with the grinding aspect, noting that the significant gap between opponents makes it difficult to progress without investing money, as weaker opponents cannot be effectively utilized to level up.
- “The jump between opponents is vast, and by disabling 'grinding' with weaker opponents, you're forced to spend money to keep up as they have the better cards.”
- “Grinding feels like a never-ending chore, making progress painfully slow and often discouraging.”
- “The game requires excessive grinding to unlock essential features, which can be frustrating and tedious.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The music in the game features familiar sounds from the original but lacks consistency, as not all elements are present for each card, leading to a disjointed harmonic experience.
- “The music creates an immersive atmosphere that enhances the overall gaming experience.”
- “Each track is carefully composed, adding depth and emotion to the gameplay.”
- “The soundtrack perfectly complements the game's themes, making every moment feel more impactful.”
- “The music doesn't quite match the original; it's the same sounds, but not necessarily all of them for a particular card, like the harmonic vibe.”
- “The soundtrack feels repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “The music is underwhelming and fails to enhance the overall gaming experience.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players consistently highlight the game's simplicity and engaging mechanics, contributing to its high replayability. Many find it fun and believe it offers endless opportunities for repeated play.
- “Simple to learn and endlessly replayable.”
- “Fun and great replayability.”