Landrule Strategy vs Risk

About

Landrule Strategy vs Risk is a single player casual strategy game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Landrule Strategy vs Risk is a 4X single-player game that offers fantastic gameplay blending strategic depth and exploration. While it is described as a multiplayer strategy experience, the current version focuses on solo play. Despite its engaging mechanics, the game is marred by numerous bugs that can affect the overall experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

80%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,804 reviews

gameplay14 positive mentions

stability12 negative mentions

The game is a fun and engaging digital version of the classic board game Risk, with many maps available for play.
The multiplayer feature is well-implemented, allowing for enjoyable games with friends.
The game offers a good challenge, especially on harder difficulty settings, providing a strategic experience.

The AI can be predictable and often targets the human player excessively, making it frustrating to play against.
There are issues with the game's balance, as players often experience unrealistic dice rolls that favor the AI.
The requirement to purchase additional maps can be off-putting for players looking for a fully free experience.

gameplay
30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
47%
43%
10%
The gameplay is characterized by a mix of simplicity and predictability, with many users finding it easy to defeat AI opponents, even at higher difficulty levels. While the fast-paced mechanics and smooth performance are praised, there are concerns about balance and unpredictability in game outcomes, particularly regarding territory and army mechanics. Overall, the game offers enjoyable, straightforward gameplay, though some players desire more depth and variety, such as mission cards and improved AI.
- “Offers endless hours of great gameplay, runs smoothly, and just a perfect game.”
- “I love the look and feel of this game, the gameplay is seamless on singleplayer, a great feature when internet play can't be had.”
- “Fast paced gameplay and wonderful support by the devs adding new maps fairly regularly, my only complaint is the slightly repetitive AI.”
- “The bot gameplay is too predictable, and has obvious flaws, so beating multiple bots is rather easy.”
- “It's hard to describe but very obvious in gameplay...algorithm needs tweaking.”
- “Terrible play mechanics.”
graphics
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
61%
13%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many users noting that while they are simple and functional, they lack polish and could be improved. Some appreciate the straightforward aesthetic as a refreshing change from overly complex visuals, while others find them underwhelming and in need of enhancement. Overall, the consensus suggests that while the graphics are acceptable for gameplay, there is significant room for improvement to elevate the visual experience.
- “A fantastic mobile take on a well-known board game that carries the same feel and fun combined with fantastic controls, simple but very clear aesthetic, and asynchronous multiplayer games that work really well!”
- “Fast gameplay with decent AI plus the graphics are simple and easy to read.”
- “Streamlined, simple game not overburdened with animations or ridiculous graphics, just straight-up gameplay.”
- “Graphics are underwhelming.”
- “I only gave it a 4 star because of 2 things: 1) graphics could be better 2) multiplayer could be very draggy due to the long gaps.”
- “The game graphics are terrible and simple.”
monetization
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
61%
6%
33%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed feedback, with many players appreciating the absence of intrusive ads, which enhances the overall experience. However, some users express frustration over the lack of unlocked maps and the perceived high cost of in-app purchases, suggesting that a more balanced approach to monetization, such as ad-supported map access, could improve player satisfaction. Overall, the preference for a no-ads model is clear, but concerns about pricing and content accessibility remain.
- “Great strategy game, no ads, just a store with extra game maps if you want them.”
- “Having no ads on the free version definitely makes this not only the best risk-like game out, but my favorite game for my mobile device!”
- “Great time killer and best of all, no ads!”
- “It's a shame, but I can't support excessive monetization via ads - it's a garbage earnings model in a flagging industry.”
- “Even on medium, it gives a stupid unfair advantage to the AI... it will screw you over constantly... also, no maps are unlocked, trying to get your money... just give me 10 ads per hour or one per game instead...”
- “Bought the in-app purchase... and thought that was a bit of a rip-off.”
stability
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
80%
The game's stability has received mixed reviews, with many users reporting frequent bugs and glitches that disrupt gameplay, particularly in single-player mode. While some players have experienced minor issues and occasional freezing, others have noted that online play is generally smoother, with only a few minor glitches. Overall, the game could benefit from further stability improvements to enhance the user experience.
- “Simple graphics are a nice change, and not buggy.”
- “No ads, mystery texts, etc. Clean little game that runs great and is easy to use.”
- “Runs great.”
- “Buggy, horrible for single player.”
- “Lost too many games because of game glitches, game freezing and can't get back until I reinstall. Grrr!”
- “Freezes with a blank screen after trying all day to play, waste of time.”
replayability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
43%
The game is praised for its high replayability, with users highlighting the variety of maps and frequent updates that enhance the experience. Many find it entertaining and believe it offers substantial replay value, making it a standout choice for players seeking longevity in gameplay.
- “Replayability is off the charts.”
- “Very entertaining, and the many maps make it quite replayable.”
- “Plenty of replay value.”
- “Every so often a new map, that keeps the replayability going.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
33%
50%
The story aspect of the game is perceived as lacking depth, with players expressing a desire for more structured missions or narrative elements beyond simple world domination. While the gameplay is enjoyable once understood, many feel that the absence of mission cards and a more engaging storyline diminishes long-term replayability. Overall, the game is considered a solid classic, but improvements in storytelling could enhance the experience.
- “Brilliant game, could do with missions rather than just world domination, but still a good version of a classic board game.”
- “Good game when you understand how to play it; it's very easy to win. Played 3 times and don't want to play anymore unless there's an addition of story or levels.”
- “You either lose your major armies at the very beginning, the AI goes on a suicide mission against you while ignoring everyone else, or it teams up against you.”
- “Only comment is there are no mission cards.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The game is praised for its smooth performance and engaging gameplay, providing endless hours of enjoyment. However, there are concerns regarding AI optimization, as all characters begin on the same three islands, which may limit strategic variety.
- “Offers endless hours of great gameplay, runs smoothly, and is just a perfect game.”
- “However, the AI is not optimized for it; they all start on the same three islands.”
- “The game suffers from severe optimization issues, leading to frequent frame drops and stuttering.”
- “I encountered numerous bugs that indicate a lack of proper optimization, making the gameplay experience frustrating.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be awkward and tedious, with some describing it as a poor execution of a risk clone. The lack of a skip button further exacerbates the repetitive nature of the gameplay, leading to frustration among users.
- “Awkward and a bit tedious.”
- “The game is a poor attempt at a risk clone, with a very tedious AI.”
- “Before them, without a skip button (that I ever saw)... that's very tedious.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the humor in the game, noting that it is clever and adds an interesting layer to the experience. The comedic elements, including amusing AI complaints, contribute to the overall enjoyment and engagement.
- “The humor in this game is sharp and clever, making every moment entertaining.”
- “I love how the game incorporates witty dialogue that keeps me laughing throughout.”
- “The comedic timing of the characters is spot on, adding a delightful twist to the gameplay.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is highlighted by its strategic depth, akin to Risk, which evokes feelings of tension and excitement as players navigate numerous maps and manage their armies. This dynamic fosters a sense of engagement and investment in the outcome of each battle.
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users feel that the game's music is lacking and suggest that enhancing it with more detail and sound effects would significantly improve the overall experience.
- “To improve this game, add more detail, music, sound effects, a colorful character, and a horizontal layout.”

Skip Game Offers

Buy Landrule Strategy vs Risk

Landrule Strategy vs Risk
See offer on Play Store

Skip Games Like Landrule Strategy vs Risk

85%1.1kreviews

Border Siege [war & risk]

Casual Strategy

67%10kreviews

RISK: Global Domination

2020

Casual Strategy

74%2.6kreviews

Influence

Casual Strategy

61%1.7kreviews

Domination (risk & strategy)

Action

79%2.3kreviews

Warzone - turn based strategy

2013

Strategy

More games like Landrule Strategy vs Risk

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Landrule Strategy vs Risk is a casual strategy game.

Landrule Strategy vs Risk is available on Phone and Tablet.

Landrule Strategy vs Risk was developed by Pixamark LLC.

Landrule Strategy vs Risk has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its stability.

Landrule Strategy vs Risk is a single player game.

Similar games include Border Siege [war & risk], RISK: Global Domination, Influence, Domination (risk & strategy), Warzone - turn based strategy and others.

Landrule Strategy vs Risk

Platforms

About

Buy Landrule Strategy vs Risk