Skip to main content

90 Minute Fever

90 Minute Fever Game Cover
63%Game Brain Score
humor, replayability
gameplay, graphics
63% User Score Based on 233 reviews

Platforms

PCMac OSWindows
View Game
Buy NowGet on Steam
90 Minute Fever Game Cover

About

90 Minute Fever is a multiplayer sport game. It was developed by Isokron and was released on September 1, 2023. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

90 Minute Fever is an accessible yet deep skill-based football management MMO. Create and customise your own club, sign real players, compete against a community of highly active managers in a persistent online world and gradually build your own legacy!

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
90 Minute Fever screenshot
90 Minute Fever screenshot
90 Minute Fever screenshot
90 Minute Fever screenshot
90 Minute Fever screenshot
90 Minute Fever screenshot
90 Minute Fever screenshot
90 Minute Fever screenshot
90 Minute Fever screenshot
90 Minute Fever screenshot
90 Minute Fever screenshot
Skip User Reviews

63%
Audience ScoreBased on 233 reviews
humor1 positive mentions
monetization2 negative mentions
  • The game offers a unique online multiplayer football management experience with real player interactions, a transfer market, and competitive leagues.
  • Developers are active and responsive, continuously updating the game, adding features like youth squads and a 2D match engine, and engaging with the community.
  • The game is skill-based and not pay-to-win, providing a level playing field where tactical and management skills matter more than spending money.
  • The match engine is criticized as very random and unbalanced, with poor player AI and lack of realistic gameplay mechanics.
  • Many core gameplay features are locked behind expensive subscriptions, including youth teams, friendlies, and advanced tactical options, making it feel pay-to-play and sometimes pay-to-win.
  • The playerbase is very small, often leading to inactive leagues, long wait times for matches, and a loss of true multiplayer interaction; the UI and overall polish are also frequently described as clunky and outdated.
  • gameplay
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Gameplay receives mixed feedback: some players find the mechanics engaging and rewarding for detailed management, appreciating the balance between new and experienced players, while others criticize poor economic design, excessive paywalls, and reliance on RNG that undermine fairness and enjoyment. Improvements in clarity, tactics understanding, and user interface could enhance the overall experience.

    • “On gameplay, I would give an 8.5/10; improvements to understanding tactics and a 2D mode would make it comfortably a 10!”
    • “About gameplay, you create a team, buy/sell players, play matches in many different FA or cup competitions, etc. A season lasts one month.”
    • “The game mechanic is designed so that a newcomer can be equal with the most experienced player in the game in a matter of one or two seasons.”
    • “I spent money to play the game and build up funds, but because the game mechanics aren't functioning properly, they made massive changes without any notification.”
    • “It's very scammy—literally stealing value from the ecosystem because they can't figure out the correct economic mechanics.”
    • “The game mechanics are very poor, and RNG is the only thing determining the outcome of a game.”
  • graphics
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics are widely criticized as outdated, low-quality pixel art that feels lazy and unpolished, reminiscent of 1970s visuals. Users note a lack of customization options and express disappointment, especially given that similar games succeed despite their simple graphics. Overall, the visuals detract from the experience and feel inferior to modern 3D alternatives.

    • “Although there may be more in-game options and better graphics in Football Manager, I love the interaction and realism of 90mf.”
    • “There are few options to change graphics, so you are essentially stuck with what they give you.”
    • “These days I would go for any one of the similar apps on the mobile device with 3D graphics and player movements.”
    • “This features really godawful, lazy pixelcrap "art" instead of real graphics.”
    • “It's hard to say if this was because the developer didn't have the skill to do the job of creating 3D visuals, or couldn't afford to hire someone who does, but it also doesn't matter.”
    • “The hub is dire, the navigation is woeful and the 1970's in-game graphics are truly terrible.”
  • optimization
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization aspect is criticized for inconsistent player value calculations tied too heavily to performance and attributes rather than realistic factors, leading to illogical player valuations. Player attributes sometimes don’t align with in-game performances, and scripted outcomes affect gameplay fairness. Additionally, bugs and poor game client performance contribute to a frustrating experience despite the game’s potential depth.

    • “Players' values and wages are strongly connected to their performance and attributes.”
    • “If you find a player via the academy, their selling value is not limited by their buy price, only by attributes and performance.”
    • “The players' selling prices can be inconsistent: some decent players with average performance sell for too much, while others making great performances do not sell for as much because they were signed cheaper.”
    • “I have players in my squad that sell for way too much (decent attributes, okay performance, nothing special), while others who deliver great performances consistently don’t sell for as much because they were signed cheaper.”
    • “Player performance feels subject to some form of scripting.”
    • “While the game has potential with its deep player pool and tactical challenge, the many bugs and frequent poor performance of the game client make it a frustrating experience.”
  • monetization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization of the game is viewed as clunky and reminiscent of mobile cash grab apps rather than polished PC titles. However, unlike games like FIFA 16 Ultimate Team, it currently has no microtransactions or in-game purchases.

    • “This game is not like FIFA 16 Ultimate Team where you have to buy coins or FIFA points to get half decent players. There are zero microtransactions in this game (as of 18th July 2016).”
    • “It's clunky and awkward compared to professionally developed games, and comes across more as a mobile cash grab app than a PC game.”
    • “Video advertising the game shows a fully functional radar.”
  • humor
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is highlighted through amusing seasonal interactions, particularly the playful conflicts with another manager, adding a lighthearted and entertaining element.

  • story
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users note that the story aspect emphasizes the distinct experience of competing against real players, setting it apart from other football simulation games.

  • replayability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users find the game highly replayable, especially enjoying its interactive features and talent scouting. Fans of Football Manager Live view it as a strong replacement, with ongoing improvements enhancing long-term engagement.

    • “The interaction is good and replay value is high. If you loved Football Manager Live, this is a welcome replacement. I love logging in and filtering new targets and talent. This game is improving and going places.”
  • emotional
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game evokes strong emotions, combining ruthlessness and challenge that can lead to intense frustration. Its emotional impact is significant, making the experience both gripping and demanding.

  • grinding
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect is streamlined by a system that reduces tedious manual scouting, allowing casual players to avoid repetitive tasks while maintaining fair play and preventing cheating.

Skip Game Offers

Buy 90 Minute Fever

900h Median play time
908h Average play time
24-1800h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 3 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like 90 Minute Fever

Games Like 90 Minute Fever

Football Manager 2018 ImageFootball Manager 2018 ImageFootball Manager 2018 Image
69%1.7kreviews

Football Manager 2018

2017Sport
LinuxPCCloud+3
Games like Football Manager 2018
Football Manager 2017 ImageFootball Manager 2017 ImageFootball Manager 2017 Image
71%2.3kreviews

Football Manager 2017

2016Casual Sport
LinuxPCCloud+3
Games like Football Manager 2017
Football Manager 2024 Image
87%8.3kreviews

Football Manager 2024

2023Sport
Nintendo SwitchEpic GamesPlaystation 5+10
Games like Football Manager 2024
Football, Tactics & Glory Image
83%1.5kreviews

Football, Tactics & Glory

2018Sport
Nintendo SwitchPCPlaystation 4+5
Games like Football, Tactics & Glory
Football Manager 2015 ImageFootball Manager 2015 ImageFootball Manager 2015 Image
75%1kreviews

Football Manager 2015

2014Sport
LinuxPCCloud+3
Games like Football Manager 2015
More games like 90 Minute Fever
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

90 Minute Fever is a sport game.

90 Minute Fever is available on PC, Mac OS and Windows.

On average players spend around 908 hours playing 90 Minute Fever.

90 Minute Fever was released on September 1, 2023.

90 Minute Fever was developed by Isokron.

90 Minute Fever has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its humor but disliked it for its gameplay.

90 Minute Fever is a multiplayer game.

Similar games include Football Manager 2018, Football Manager 2017, Football Manager 2024, Football, Tactics & Glory, Football Manager 2015 and others.