吞食天地2：誕生Reborn

About

吞食天地2：誕生Reborn is a multiplayer role playing game. It was developed by Chinesegamer and was released on February 16, 2024. It received negative reviews from players.

【12/31(三)開機公告】親愛的玩家：你好！《吞食天地2：誕生Reborn》目前已完成維護並開機。另外為感謝玩家耐心等候更新維護，將發放【維護補償包*1】作為維護補償，還請登入遊戲後，於【聚寶閣】內【百寶箱】進行確認。 About the Game　　三國題材的長青樹，獨立開發遊戲的先行者，《吞食天地2：誕生Reborn》將在STEAM平台再次掀起一陣三國MMORPG新旋風！親身體驗吞食天地的各種魅力，現在馬上就加入！故事背景　　東漢末年，盜賊四起，群雄割據。在這個動盪不安的亂世中，來自四面八方的勢力或互相征伐或吞併，隱然形成三大勢力鼎足而立的局面……。而你，這名初入軍營的新兵，是否能破繭而出，成為這個時代的明日之星？現在就開始闖蕩江湖，與各路三國豪傑結交，親身參與歷史上的名戰役，成為新一代的三國英雄吧！遊戲特色多元劇情，暢遊三國！．重塑主線劇情：重新演繹三國史…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

31%

Audience ScoreBased on 16 reviews

monetization3 negative mentions

Some players feel nostalgic about the game, recalling positive experiences from the original version.
A few users appreciate the gameplay mechanics, mentioning enjoyment in exploring the game and completing quests.
Despite its flaws, some players find it to be a decent RPG experience compared to other recent releases.

The game is heavily criticized for its aggressive microtransaction model, which many players find predatory.
There are numerous reports of bugs and technical issues, including login failures and missing files, leading to a frustrating experience.
The game has been accused of review manipulation, with fake positive reviews misleading potential players about its quality.

monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization aspect of the game has been criticized for its reliance on deceptive practices, with numerous reviews suggesting that the game is part of a trend of asset flips and cash grabs, supported by suspiciously coordinated and low-quality feedback from newly created accounts.
- “The monetization system feels exploitative, with prices set unreasonably high for in-game items that should be accessible to all players.”
- “It seems like the game was designed primarily to extract money from players rather than provide a fair and enjoyable experience.”
- “The constant push for microtransactions disrupts the gameplay and makes it hard to enjoy the game without spending extra money.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics are criticized for being shallow and overly bright, resembling a cheap, colorful aesthetic akin to a casino poker machine. Overall, the visuals received a low rating of 2/10.
- “The game visuals and the game itself are incredibly shallow... think of them as the too-bright, colorful, thin plastic cabinet dress theme on a poker machine at the casino.”
- “Graphics: 2/10”