World War Heroes — WW2 PvP FPS | Game Brain

World War Heroes — WW2 PvP FPS Game Cover

About

"World War Heroes - WW2 PvP FPS" is a shooter game set in WW2 with both single-player and multiplayer modes. The game boasts good mechanics, masterful graphics, and a wholesome story, but is marred by lots of grinding, too much advertisement, and frequent bugs. Join players worldwide in this legendary multiplayer shooter and experience the intensity of WW2 battles.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

World War Heroes — WW2 PvP FPS screenshot

63%

Audience ScoreBased on 10,000 reviews

graphics1.3k positive mentions

monetization433 negative mentions

Great graphics and sound design, providing an immersive WWII experience.
Smooth gameplay with a variety of weapons and maps, making it enjoyable to play.
Regular updates and improvements from developers show commitment to enhancing the game.

Severe pay-to-win mechanics, making it difficult for free-to-play players to compete.
Unbalanced matchmaking, often pairing lower-level players with those who have significantly better gear.
Frequent server issues and bugs, including crashes and lag, detracting from the overall experience.

graphics
1,895 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
70%
26%
3%
The graphics of the game have received widespread praise for their realism and detail, often compared favorably to console-level visuals. Players appreciate the high-resolution rendering, which enhances the immersive experience of the World War II setting, although some have noted issues with lag and performance on lower-end devices. While the graphics are generally considered a strong point, there are calls for further improvements and optimizations to enhance gameplay and reduce lag.
- “Amazing graphics, fun gameplay, high customization, variety of maps, it's all good.”
- “The most beautiful thing of the game is its realistic graphics that are being upgraded day by day.”
- “The graphics are fantastic and the maps are also good but a lot of bugs are still there, match is cancelled and the server suddenly becomes unavailable.”
- “The graphics are the worst.”
- “This game has very bad graphics; I should have never downloaded this game. Candy Crush is better than this third-grade game.”
- “The game looks hilariously bad on my S20 and reminds me of a Nintendo 64 game graphics-wise; I don't know how people still actually play this.”
gameplay
782 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
34%
6%
The gameplay of the game is generally praised for its smoothness, enjoyable mechanics, and engaging graphics, making it a fun experience for players. However, many users express concerns about the pay-to-win elements, unbalanced matchmaking, and issues with weapon effectiveness, particularly at higher levels. Additionally, some players report problems with lag, ads disrupting gameplay, and a lack of diverse maps, which can detract from the overall experience.
- “Amazing game, definitely the very best that I have ever played.. graphics are beautifully done and gameplay is phenomenal.”
- “The gameplay is really fun and easy to control, it's not pay to win but if you want to purchase some nice things you don't have to spend lots of money as there are special offers all the time :)”
- “Great graphics, gameplay and it has the most pleasant game modes.”
- “Unfair gameplay due to many godmode hackers that you can't kill.”
- “The gameplay is terrible.”
- “However, the further you progress the further gameplay is weighted to players who pay for upgrades, to a degree that makes it impossible to compete with them.”
monetization
524 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
12%
83%
The monetization model of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over the prevalence of ads and the pay-to-win mechanics. While some appreciate the option to watch ads for rewards, others find the mandatory ads after every match excessive and disruptive, leading to a negative gaming experience. Additionally, in-app purchases are often criticized for being overpriced, creating an imbalance between paying and non-paying players, which detracts from overall enjoyment.
- “No ads are ever forced on you; they are 100% optional, which is so awesome in the way apps usually run.”
- “Great game, I wish you could buy weapons with the cash you saved; will this be possible to do in future updates instead of just gold or in-game purchases?”
- “Also, there's almost no ads, so all those people who say there are too many ads in this game are lying because every 2-3 games I get 1 ad, and it's great for a free-to-play first-person shooter.”
- “The game could have become so much better, but the developers decided to base the game fully on microtransactions.”
- “It's a pay-to-win game with microtransactions, meaning that progress without spending real money is hard and tedious.”
- “The gameplay is good, but it has a lot of ads, the best weapons are only available for real money (and a lot of it), and the in-game rewards are also scaled low to push players to spend real money.”
stability
287 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
98%
The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with frequent reports of glitches, lag, and crashes disrupting gameplay. Many players experience issues such as freezing during matches, connection problems, and server errors, leading to frustration and a decline in overall enjoyment. Despite some positive feedback on gameplay and graphics, the overwhelming sentiment is that the game suffers from severe stability issues that need urgent attention from developers.
- “The game so far has no glitches and it's just a fun Call of Duty-like game.”
- “I love it; it is epic! No glitches, no crashes, and the graphics are excellent.”
- “Great game, easy gameplay, and for a mobile game, it runs great.”
- “Sadly, after months of gameplay, I'm leaving because of connection problems, game lag, and glitches.”
- “Major lagging issues, game freezes and kicks you out, very poor connection and continuous server error.”
- “This game was fun, now you can't play more than two matches before the game cuts off. Too many glitches and it freezes up.”
story
217 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
76%
5%
The reviews indicate a strong desire for a story mode in the game, with many players expressing disappointment over the lack of a narrative-driven campaign. While the graphics and gameplay mechanics receive praise, users feel that the absence of a cohesive storyline detracts from the overall experience, making the game feel repetitive and less engaging. Many suggest that incorporating a story mode could significantly enhance the game's appeal and longevity.
- “This game is amazing! I love the graphics, maps, and the guns. All I wish for is a story mode in WWII, focusing on destroying the Nazis and including emotional parts like losing close friends in battle or sacrifices. I'd love to see more game modes in the game. Keep up the good work!”
- “I really love this game as I love stories about WWII, and the graphics are fantastic. I suggest upgrading controls, adding new zones, and implementing a story mode with missions.”
- “Hey Azur team, I love this game, but the only thing missing as a WWII game is a story mode. A story mode would make it incredibly exciting. Thanks if you add it!”
- “But the problem is here have no story content.”
- “No story mode to speak of which was kind of disheartening though.”
- “I thought there was a story mode too; for a 2GB game, it's boring because there's only a team deathmatch.”
grinding
73 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring players to invest hours to earn in-game currency and upgrades, which can feel unrewarding. Many reviews highlight a frustrating pay-to-win model, where players who spend real money can easily outpace those who rely solely on grinding, leading to a lack of balance and enjoyment in gameplay. While some players appreciate the challenge of grinding, the overwhelming sentiment is that it detracts from the overall experience, making progression feel nearly impossible without financial investment.
- “It's a fun game with great graphics for mobile, but it is hard to gain in-game currency and experience/up trade points without grinding for hours at a time (not really what mobile games are for).”
- “This game is fun but definitely a money trap; all the decent weapons and gear take a crazy amount of grinding to unlock or a ridiculous amount of money.”
- “The game is just not fun; you are currently fighting enemies with overpowered weapons which can only be purchased with real money, and you are forced to use the season pass weapon that can only be obtained by grinding hours every day, playing matches.”
optimization
57 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
37%
51%
12%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players experiencing significant performance issues, including frame rate drops and lag, particularly during animations and on new maps. While some updates have improved performance for certain users, others continue to report that the game is unplayable due to poor optimization and server problems. Overall, there is a strong demand for further optimization efforts to enhance stability and performance across a wider range of devices.
- “Yes, Azur did a new upgrade from 1.35.0 to 1.35.1, which is working perfectly. The weapon runs smoothly without lag and provides a battle chest of gold. Happy, thanks for paying attention to the demands of players.”
- “Game is so good, well optimized, and very realistic.”
- “It's greatly optimized and runs smoothly with great hit registration and fluid controls.”
- “Performance runs normally at 30fps - but when the animations start running, it drops to a point where it's unplayable.”
- “The game is not bad overall, but it is poorly optimized.”
- “The game needs serious optimization.”
humor
27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
96%
11%
The humor in the game is primarily derived from its ragdoll physics and exaggerated gameplay mechanics, such as hilarious weapon interactions and absurd matchmaking scenarios. Players find the combination of funny glitches, overpowered melee attacks, and the chaotic nature of battles to be entertaining, despite frustrations with pay-to-win elements and unbalanced gameplay. Overall, while the game has its comedic moments, it also faces criticism for its monetization strategies and gameplay inconsistencies.
- “The ragdoll physics are very funny and satisfying when you send players flying with a grenade blast.”
- “Also, people reading this, this game is funny because of the ragdoll and cool explosions 🤣”
- “It's a funny game.”
- “It's not funny anymore, and I'm going to uninstall this game.”
- “The jokes fell flat and felt forced, making the experience more cringeworthy than enjoyable.”
- “I expected humor, but instead, I was met with tired clichés and unoriginal gags.”
music
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
28%
60%
12%
The music in the game has received mixed feedback, with some players enjoying the background tracks and sound effects, while others report significant issues such as glitches, missing audio during battles, and music that becomes distorted or overly loud. Many users express frustration over these audio problems, which detract from an otherwise enjoyable gameplay experience. Overall, while the music is appreciated by some, its inconsistent performance has led to dissatisfaction among players.
- “The music glitches sometimes which makes the game crash.”
- “Whoever put the music in the background, nice touch!”
- “Simple to grasp, outstanding graphics, crisp sound effects, good music.”
- “But the latest update there is zero sound during battle and zero music, but the ads come in with sound, hmmm?”
- “The music glitches sometimes, which makes the game crash.”
- “After level 7, it's being stuck in between and after one life, it's not going further... a blank screen is being shown and only background music is being played... waste of downloading.”
atmosphere
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
42%
33%
25%
The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its immersive World War II setting, enhanced by impressive sound design and detailed graphics that evoke a realistic war environment. Players appreciate the intensity and claustrophobia of battle scenarios, although some feel that the overall atmosphere could be improved with additional features and refinements. While many enjoy the atmospheric elements, a few critiques highlight that the combat mechanics detract from the overall experience.
- “The gameplay, the weapons, the atmosphere, and even its historical setup create an immersive experience.”
- “Played this game on my son-in-law's Xbox One, loved it then; the intensity of war and the claustrophobic atmosphere of a war-torn city are very realistic.”
- “Atmosphere is lacking.”
- “Played this game on my son-in-law's Xbox One, loved it then; the intensity of war, very realistic, the claustrophobic atmosphere of a war-torn city.”
- “It plays smoothly and reflects the atmosphere of World War II.”
emotional
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a desire for a more emotionally engaging experience in the game, particularly through the inclusion of a story mode that highlights themes of sacrifice and loss during wartime. While the game is praised for its graphics and gameplay, many feel that the lack of emotional depth detracts from the overall experience, and they believe that a narrative focused on real historical events could enhance player attachment and investment. Additionally, frustrations with the game's monetization and balance issues contribute to a sense of wasted effort, overshadowing the emotional highs of gameplay.
- “This game is amazing! I love the graphics, maps, and the guns. All that I wish for is a story mode in WWII all about destroying the Nazis, and I want it to have emotional parts, like losing close friends in the field of battle or sacrifices. I'd love to see more game modes in the game. Keep up the good work! 👍”
- “All in all, I say 4 stars. It's challenging and emotional at times. My temper gets a little high because the guys who buy the battle pass are so hard to kill compared to my minor outfitting, but it's fun.”
- “WWII games without a story mode 😠 There will be great emotional attachment with the game if it includes a story mode based on actual events.”
replayability
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
29%
43%
Overall, players have mixed feelings about the game's replayability. While some enjoy the quick battles and weapon upgrades that enhance the experience, others find the competitive nature and performance issues, such as lag and matchmaking against stronger opponents, detract from their enjoyment and willingness to replay. The game's simplicity is noted as a double-edged sword, offering fun but lacking depth for long-term engagement.
- “This game is very fun with a high replayability.”
- “Pro: quick battles, awesome weapons, good replay value.”
- “It's a good game for its simplicity, but not its replayability if you ask me.”
- “Make the game less competitive; the game is clunky and heavy. Every time I play, I'm matched against immortals. I can't even breathe. It's minus 1 star for me. I have wasted all my gold and money to get new weapons and upgrade them to max, and still, I get slapped in the face. Someone who can't afford a pay-to-win playstyle shouldn't be punished like that. Make the game more playable and balanced soon, otherwise I'm uninstalling.”
- “I do not recommend it; there are many other games that are more playable with fewer errors.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Character development in the game is criticized for technical issues, including frequent crashes and hangs, which detract from the overall experience and hinder players' connection with the characters.
- “The character development feels shallow and uninspired.”
- “I was expecting more depth in the characters, but they all seem one-dimensional.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices in character progression makes the experience feel stale.”