Warface GO: FPS shooting games

About

Warface GO: FPS shooting games is a single player tactical shooter game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Warface GO: FPS Shooting games is a mobile shooter game with impressive visuals and engaging game mechanics. It offers an awesome story, plenty of humor, and online multiplayer action, however, it is plagued by bugs and frequent ads, and requires grinding. As described by the game itself, it is a FPS shooting game online with gun games and critical ops for combat enthusiasts.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Warface GO: FPS shooting games screenshot

Skip User Reviews

69%

Audience ScoreBased on 10,000 reviews

graphics1.1k positive mentions

monetization235 negative mentions

Great graphics and smooth gameplay.
Fun and addictive with a variety of weapons and upgrades.
Engaging multiplayer experience with quick matchmaking.

Heavily pay-to-win mechanics, making it difficult for free players to compete.
Unbalanced matchmaking often pairs low-level players with high-level opponents.
Controls can be unresponsive and lack customization options.

graphics
1,693 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
64%
25%
11%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising them as excellent or console-quality, particularly for a mobile game. However, there are numerous complaints about the graphics being underwhelming or not matching the expectations set by promotional materials, with some users describing them as cartoonish or poor. Overall, while the graphics are often highlighted as a strong point, there is a significant call for improvements and optimizations to meet the standards of other popular titles in the genre.
- “The graphics are fantastic for being on mobile.”
- “The graphics are great and the gameplay is smooth even on my lower-end tablet - which is a plus.”
- “The graphics are console level and you have a wide variety of armory and weapons.”
- “It's not a game, it's a piece of trash; the graphics don't look like a 2GB game, and the sound is not improved. The major problem is connectivity error; it keeps saying connection error, due to which I cannot join battles.”
- “The graphics are horrible, the combat is completely clunky and uninspired, there are ads that are constantly annoying you, the interface is buggy as hell to navigate, and overall it's just a pile of hot garbage.”
- “The graphics that are being shown in the ads are nowhere near the actual graphics in-game, even at max graphics.”
gameplay
608 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
46%
39%
15%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its smooth mechanics and engaging combat, while others criticize it for being slow-paced, lacking essential features like jumping and crouching, and having a pay-to-win structure. Users appreciate the graphics and overall fun factor but express frustration over unbalanced matchmaking, control issues, and the presence of bots, which detracts from the competitive experience. Overall, while the game shows potential, significant improvements in gameplay mechanics and balance are needed to enhance player satisfaction.
- “Overall the game is superb, gameplay is engaging and smooth.”
- “The graphics and gameplay are top notch and very smooth.”
- “Great gameplay with good graphics makes up for the moments of lagginess during matches.”
- “The gameplay is a huge let down.”
- “Gameplay is just like any other mobile shooter.”
- “The controls are terrible and the gameplay is even worse.”
monetization
267 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
6%
88%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over the abundance of ads and the pay-to-win model. While some appreciate the option to earn rewards through watching ads, others feel that the game heavily favors those who spend money, leading to an uneven playing field. Overall, the consensus indicates that excessive ads and in-app purchases detract from the gaming experience, making it feel more like a cash grab than a balanced free-to-play title.
- “There are in-game purchase items, but I've encountered no money grabs so far, which is a pleasant change from the norm.”
- “It's a great game; there are no ads other than the one you use to get rewards.”
- “I love the graphics, the gameplay, it doesn't have any ads, and it doesn't glitch!”
- “This has the potential to be a highly rated shooter, but it's too much of a cash grab.”
- “The game is surely fun but it's more of a 'watch ads to win' because other than pay-to-win, you have to watch ads to get most of your stuff that you're going to use in matches.”
- “It's just a cash grab and unfortunately it's not fun that way.”
story
154 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
70%
3%
The reviews indicate a strong desire for a more robust story mode in the game, with many players expressing disappointment over the lack of single-player campaigns and co-op missions that were present in the console and PC versions. While some users appreciate the gameplay and graphics, they feel that the absence of a compelling narrative and varied missions detracts from the overall experience, leading to repetitive gameplay. Overall, players are calling for significant improvements in storytelling elements to enhance engagement and enjoyment.
- “PVE is like your story mode with you and up to 3 teammates following a story and battling app-generated enemies.”
- “The original Warface had the story missions that were co-op with multiplayer on the side.”
- “I just recommend you add a story mode in the game that will definitely make the game more awesome.”
- “Some folks might like this game, but I was led to believe from an ad that there was a story mode, and there isn't one, so I uninstalled.”
- “Disappointed, I've played Warface on console and I love it, but when I loaded into the game and played my first online match, it just didn't feel like Warface at all. I got bored with it within two and a half hours. Please just make some changes to the game to make it more like the original game with the co-op missions and zombie game mode.”
- “I was hoping to see the campaign missions like the PC version does, but apparently it was a let down.”
stability
131 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
7%
1%
92%
The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with frequent reports of glitches, freezes, and lag affecting gameplay. Many players experience issues such as camera shifts, unresponsive controls, and connection problems, particularly during matches. While some users note improvements over time, the overall consensus is that the game remains buggy and requires substantial fixes to enhance stability and user experience.
- “Love the game, no glitches, nothing. It is totally wonderful; I love the realism of the guns. Everything would be cool if you could create or customize your gear or even masks more than what you can.”
- “Not a competition to COD Mobile, but for average devices who want something like COD but can't have it. It's for them: good controls and bug-free experiences.”
- “No glitches, runs surprisingly well, and no lag.”
- “The game is incredibly buggy, extremely raw and has many issues.”
- “Game freezes every 1 or 2 minutes in the middle of the game.”
- “It freezes a lot, and the camera will suddenly move in another direction when you're not even moving.”
optimization
86 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
37%
43%
20%
Overall, the game's optimization is a significant concern among users, with many reporting issues such as lag, inconsistent frame rates, and poor performance on low-end devices. While some players appreciate the graphics and gameplay, they express a strong desire for improvements in optimization to enhance the experience, particularly for budget phones. Frequent mentions of glitches, janky animations, and the need for better control responsiveness highlight the game's current shortcomings in this area.
- “The optimization is to the point.”
- “Amazing game; runs smoothly on low-end hardware.”
- “I love this game; it's the best and the optimization is nice, good job guys.”
- “The performance of the game is very bad; it should be optimized and smooth. In the menu, it's 60 fps, but in-game it drops to 30 or less, lagging for 2 or 3 seconds.”
- “This game is a total mess; it's not optimized at all for Mali GPUs. Everything is in pink color, and every time I try to start a match, it says that the connection is lost.”
- “The controls were terrible, the optimization wasn't there, the game isn't polished at all, and feels clunky. They should've hired a real mobile developer for this; it's sad seeing this game in this terrible state after having a blast with it on PC.”
grinding
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews highlight a significant issue with grinding in the game, noting that while it is possible to progress through matches, the amount of time required to unlock items is excessive, often leading to a pay-to-win scenario. Many players express frustration over the lag and balancing issues, which detract from the grinding experience, making it feel tedious and unrewarding. Overall, while some enjoy the grind, the consensus is that it is overly demanding and incentivizes spending real money to achieve competitive advantages.
- “As you very slowly level up, you unlock things that cost more and more until they require 10 years of grinding or $10 real money, and there are so many.”
- “This game is so money hungry and so unmatched it's impossible to get anywhere with it without spending months grinding. I made it to level 12, but I literally died more times than not, most of the time as soon as I got spawned in. That's what happens when you get level two against level 100 or better. Maybe if they loosened up on trying to sell you all the guns for such a high cost, it would be better.”
- “Probably the worst game I've ever had since almost 99% of the guns have to be bought with real money or money in-game that costs real money to get, or grinding for practically 2 years straight.”
music
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
63%
21%
The music in the game receives mixed feedback from users, with many expressing a desire for more background music during matches to enhance the overall experience, as the current soundscape feels empty and monotonous. While some players appreciate the existing soundtrack and nostalgic elements, others criticize the lack of in-game music and sound effects, suggesting that it detracts from the gameplay. Overall, there is a consensus that adding more music and sound cues could significantly improve the game's atmosphere.
- “I really love the music.”
- “Oh yeah, I like Warface so much that I even listen to the supported music while playing in online multiplayer on the Xbox!”
- “I have to give this game a 5-star rating. This game is really awesome, fun, and competitive. I really love the design, the soundtrack, the sound effects, and much more. Simple mechanics, but it's a great game I enjoy!”
- “The sound they make when shooting and the music is very annoying.”
- “This game is awesome although it could use a little bit of music in the background while playing the matches; it sounds so dead when you're playing the matches and all you hear is assault rifles.”
- “The game is so underdeveloped; it's so boring there's no music or startup sounds for rounds, the guns don't sound real, and players feel like I'm playing with bots...”
humor
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Overall, players find the humor in the game to be a highlight, often noting its amusing character designs, ragdoll physics, and entertaining gameplay moments. While some critiques focus on gameplay mechanics and balance, many users appreciate the lightheartedness and fun factor, making it an enjoyable experience despite its flaws. The humor contributes significantly to the game's charm, with players expressing a desire for more content and customization options.
- “Character design & movements is ugly & funny.”
- “D for now and sit this out made me laugh tho and nice try.”
- “I've played this game from season 4 and I've spent some money for weapons that I wanted. It's a fun game and I love one-shotting people lol, it's funny as heck.”
emotional
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express a mix of emotions regarding the game, with some enjoying it enough to play daily, while others feel frustrated by issues like ads and unbalanced gameplay. The emotional responses range from excitement and enjoyment to anger and disappointment, particularly related to gameplay mechanics and monetization strategies.
- “Please forgive me, but I got a bit emotional when I was over 1GB, and I was very angry too.”
atmosphere
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The atmosphere of the game has been criticized for its poor sound quality and lack of engaging audio elements, leading to a silent and uninspiring experience that can make players feel sleepy. Additionally, the absence of controller support and a lackluster game intro further detracts from the overall atmosphere, with some users noting that the Switch version offers a significantly better experience.
- “The overall atmosphere is incredibly immersive, creating a sense of solitude that draws you into the game world.”
- “The haunting sound design and visuals combine to create an eerie atmosphere that keeps you on edge.”
- “The rich, detailed environments contribute to a captivating atmosphere that makes exploration feel rewarding.”
- “The sound quality and overall audio atmosphere is too bad; it needs to be improved!”
- “The overall atmosphere is so silent that it makes you sleepy while playing.”
- “There is no controller support, no atmosphere in the game intros, and the Switch version is 100 times better than this.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Character development is criticized for its poor design and awkward movements, which some users find amusing but ultimately detracts from the overall experience.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game is noted for its excellent replay value, encouraging players to return for multiple playthroughs.
- “This game has incredible replay value, with multiple paths and endings to explore.”
- “The variety of character builds and strategies keeps me coming back for more.”
- “Each playthrough feels fresh due to the dynamic events and choices that change the outcome.”

Skip Game Offers

Buy Warface GO: FPS shooting games

Warface GO: FPS shooting games
See offer on Play Store

78h Median play time

103h Average play time

10-300h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 4 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Games Like Warface GO: FPS shooting games

63%10kreviews

World War Heroes — WW2 PvP FPS

Tactical Shooter

79%10kreviews

Modern Ops: Gun Shooting Games

Tactical Shooter

78%10kreviews

World War 2－FPS Shooting Games

Tactical Shooter

72%10kreviews

Critical Strike CS: Online FPS

2019

Tactical Shooter

74%10kreviews

Infinity Ops: Cyberpunk FPS

Tactical Shooter

More games like Warface GO: FPS shooting games

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Warface GO: FPS shooting games is a tactical shooter game.

Warface GO: FPS shooting games is available on Phone, Tablet, Android, Cloud and others.

On average players spend around 103 hours playing Warface GO: FPS shooting games.

Warface GO: FPS shooting games was developed by Innova Solutions FZ-LLC.

Warface GO: FPS shooting games has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

Warface GO: FPS shooting games is a single player game.

Similar games include World War Heroes — WW2 PvP FPS, Modern Ops: Gun Shooting Games, World War 2－FPS Shooting Games, Critical Strike CS: Online FPS, Infinity Ops: Cyberpunk FPS and others.

Warface GO: FPS shooting games

Platforms

About

Buy Warface GO: FPS shooting games