Wordfeud Premium Game Cover

Wordfeud Premium is a multiplayer word game with good mechanics and delightful graphics, but it can be marred by excessive advertisements and bugs. The goal is to create high-scoring words on a virtual game board to compete against friends or random opponents. Despite its drawbacks, the core gameplay remains enjoyable and challenging.

  • Phone
  • Android
  • Mobile Platform
  • Tablet

Reviews

94%
Audience ScoreBased on 9,980 reviews
graphics20 positive mentions
monetization291 negative mentions
  • Great implementation of Scrabble with a clean interface and minimal ads.
  • The random board feature adds an exciting twist to gameplay, making each match unique.
  • The ability to chat with opponents enhances the social aspect of the game.
  • The 'find random opponent' function has become ineffective, often matching players with bots instead of real people.
  • The dictionary is outdated, frequently rejecting valid words while accepting obscure ones.
  • Connection errors and issues with notifications have been reported, disrupting gameplay.
  • monetization376 mentions

    The monetization aspect of the game is primarily centered around a one-time purchase option to remove ads, which many users find worthwhile for an uninterrupted gaming experience. While the free version includes some ads, they are generally considered less intrusive compared to similar games, and the premium version offers a clean, ad-free interface with additional features like statistics. However, some users have reported issues with ads reappearing after purchasing the premium version, leading to frustration despite the initial satisfaction with the ad-free experience.

    • “No ads on premium version, no timers, just a game of word skill to play at your own pace.”
    • “Premium version is great because there are no ads to deal with.”
    • “No ads, no commercials, just playing games and making friends.”
    • “That app is bloated with spammy ads and pop-ups that beg you to try different features and challenges over and over again no matter your settings, and they require a subscription just to hide the ads. This app is much simpler without adding a bunch of useless features.”
    • “Everything worked as expected but 2 or 3 days later it reverted to the 'free' version, the ads came back and statistics were again hidden.”
    • “I paid for this app so I don't want ads from Wordfeud itself.”
  • graphics51 mentions

    The graphics of the game are generally described as simple, clean, and aesthetically pleasing, appealing to players who prefer a straightforward experience without flashy animations or distractions. While some users appreciate the recent updates that enhance visual quality, others feel the graphics remain basic and could benefit from further improvement. Overall, the focus on functionality over elaborate graphics is a recurring theme, making it a favored choice for those seeking a pure word game experience.

    • “This is such an aesthetically pleasing departure, returning to simple, yet sophisticated, scrabble-esque play!”
    • “I love the clean, simple graphics.”
    • “Good gameplay and graphics - fairly refined and best-in-class of the scrabble clone apps.”
    • “The overall graphics look so dull and depressing.”
    • “At this point the game needs a facelift or some small animation or graphics.”
    • “I used to love the simplicity of the graphics, but now the animations are extremely annoying and very slow.”
  • stability50 mentions

    Overall, users report that the game is generally stable and bug-free, with many praising its smooth performance and lack of glitches. While some players have experienced occasional freezing or minor technical issues, these seem to be infrequent and do not detract significantly from the overall enjoyment. Many long-term players highlight the game's reliability compared to other similar titles, making it a preferred choice for word game enthusiasts.

    • “Not really fancy graphics but it is very well executed and relatively bug free.”
    • “Been playing for years with no glitches.”
    • “Very well implemented and bug free!”
    • “But since lately the game is having so much glitches.”
    • “Unfortunately it is very buggy on my tablet.”
    • “It freezes once in awhile.”
  • gameplay27 mentions

    The gameplay is generally praised for its smoothness, reliability, and addictive nature, with many users appreciating the subtle improvements and lack of distractions compared to similar word games. While some find the interface plain or amateurish, the core mechanics are solid and enjoyable, with features like asynchronous play and multi-device support enhancing the experience. Overall, it is considered a top choice among word game apps, offering a fulfilling and mostly bug-free gameplay experience.

    • “Smooth, fun gameplay with no distractions.”
    • “Consistently good and fulfilling gameplay, and mostly bug-free.”
    • “Good gameplay and graphics - fairly refined and best-in-class of the scrabble clone apps.”
    • “The new design is amateurish and doesn't add to the gameplay.”
    • “The new visual effects look cool at first, but don't contribute to gameplay in any way and are in fact annoying after a while.”
    • “When you have 10-15 people doing that at once, very little gameplay is actually taking place.”
  • optimization12 mentions

    Overall, the game's optimization is praised for its smooth performance across various platforms, particularly on Android, with significant improvements in performance metrics and graphical representations. While some users express a desire for more detailed performance tracking, the general consensus is that the game runs efficiently and has made notable strides in optimization compared to previous versions.

    • “Great game and exceptional performance with my Android.”
    • “The graphs for overall performance are 100 times better than previous.”
    • “Loads quickly, runs smoothly.”
    • “Having played EA's Scrabble game for several years, I finally got fed up with slow performance, crashes, and updates that never fixed anything.”
    • “I've been playing for about 8 years, I believe, though the game did not always track performance metrics, which is a bit disappointing (I'm a numbers guy), but at least it's there now.”
    • “Would love to see stats from all games made available to us to keep track of performance!”
  • humor6 mentions

    The humor in the game is described as engaging and enjoyable, with players finding it a significant part of their daily routine. While it offers amusing interactions and games, some users feel it lacks a broader vocabulary for humor. Overall, it successfully combines fun gameplay with social elements, making it a hit among friends and family.

    • “Remains funny.”
    • “You can chat and play funny games, such as rude words only, with your friends and family.”
    • “It works okay, and is funny; it just doesn't know enough words.”
    • “Unfunny: it's two games for the price of one.”
    • “The jokes fall flat and feel forced.”
    • “Attempts at humor are cringeworthy and miss the mark.”
  • music4 mentions

    The reviews indicate a preference for a game experience that minimizes distractions, with users appreciating the absence of music and animations, which they find unnecessary. The focus is on stable gameplay and clear graphics, suggesting that the lack of background music is seen as a positive feature.

    • “The background music enhances the overall experience, creating an immersive atmosphere.”
    • “The game features stable, clear graphics and a well-balanced audio experience.”
    • “I appreciate that the game focuses on gameplay without distracting music or unnecessary animations.”
    • “What I found was a better game (without all the nonsense of music, ads, buffering, etc) that's easy to play!”
    • “No teacher, no music, no pointless animations.”
    • “Background music?”
  • grinding3 mentions

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and frustrating, often feeling that it detracts from the overall enjoyment. The lack of clarity on which words are valid adds to the monotony, making the gameplay feel more like a chore than an engaging experience.

    • “It's reached the point where it's become tedious.”
    • “Makes the game a bit tedious at times.”
    • “Doesn't tell you which word won't work, making it more tedious to play a guessing game.”
  • story3 mentions

    The story aspect of the game is perceived as lacking depth, with users noting that it follows a familiar pattern seen in other Scrabble clones. However, players find that the words created during gameplay can weave a unique narrative of their own.

    • “The dictionary used is very dodgy, but it's the same story with all the other Scrabble clones.”
    • “True story.”
    • “The words formed during each game tell a story!”
  • emotional3 mentions

    Players find the game to be an addictive and wholesome experience that fosters emotional well-being by facilitating connections with friends and family. Its smooth gameplay enhances the overall enjoyment, making it a satisfying alternative to other similar apps.

    • “Runs a lot smoother than other scrabble app options, and brings along a sense of emotional well-being while you play.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Wordfeud Premium

Play time

72hMedian play time
60hAverage play time
72-72hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 4 analyzed playthroughs

Similar Games