WIN THE GAME: DO IT!

About

WIN THE GAME: DO IT! is a single player action game. It was developed by AFBIK Studio and was released on May 2, 2018. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Win the Game: Do It!" is a hardcore game with over 25 levels and over 2 hours of gameplay. The game features simple controls and pleasant music, but the challenging gameplay will test your nerves. Try to complete all the levels and become a winner.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

59%

Audience ScoreBased on 141 reviews

humor2 positive mentions

gameplay4 negative mentions

The game offers an impressive 5000 achievements, making it a great choice for achievement hunters.
It provides a straightforward challenge that rewards patience and persistence, appealing to players who enjoy hardcore platformers.
The minimalist design and simple mechanics allow players to focus entirely on mastering the gameplay.

The gameplay is frustratingly repetitive and lacks depth, with poor controls and hitboxes that make it difficult to progress.
The game feels more like an achievement farming tool than a genuine gaming experience, with little to no real content or fun.
Many players report technical issues, including crashes and problems with unlocking achievements, detracting from the overall experience.

gameplay
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
70%
17%
The gameplay has been widely criticized for being repetitive, clunky, and frustrating, with many reviewers noting poor mechanics and technical issues that detract from the overall experience. While some players appreciate the focus on pure gameplay, the consensus is that it lacks depth and is primarily an achievement spam game rather than a fulfilling gaming experience. Overall, the gameplay is deemed unsatisfactory, with many recommending against purchasing the game for its mechanics alone.
- “Instead, you confront the bare mechanics of timing and precision.”
- “It’s a refreshing throwback for players who crave the purity of gameplay divorced from modern embellishments.”
- “The gameplay itself is where you win the game: do it!”
- “The gameplay remains frustratingly repetitive and clunky, with mechanics that seem to have barely evolved.”
- “The gameplay is horrendous for numerous reasons.”
- “The gameplay sucks; the collision and hitboxes are terrible, it's hard to control your character, and the main menus are hard to navigate and make no sense.”
story
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
70%
30%
The game's story is characterized by its minimalism, lacking elaborate narratives or cinematic introductions, which has led some players to question its existence altogether. While it offers a straightforward experience, the overall consensus suggests that the story is either underdeveloped or non-existent, with some even comparing it unfavorably to other narratives. Players can expect a brief engagement with the main storyline, typically lasting between 10 to 20 hours.
- “From its opening moments, the game sets a tone of simplicity and intensity, offering no elaborate story, cinematic introduction, or tutorialized comfort.”
- “What story?”
- “Twilight was a better love story than this.”
graphics
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
56%
33%
The graphics are criticized for being sparse and functional, lacking depth and atmosphere, with simplistic 2D visuals reminiscent of low-effort flash or mobile games. Users note the absence of resolution options and graphics tweaks, leading to a disappointing experience for PC gamers expecting higher quality visuals. Overall, the game's graphics are deemed inadequate, contributing to a lackluster overall impression.
- “The art style is sparse and functional, focusing entirely on conveying geometry and hazard rather than atmosphere.”
- “There's no option to change the resolution and no useful graphics tweaks.”
- “The game features somewhat lazy, simplistic 2D graphics, of the type you normally expect to see in low-effort flash/browser games and mobile apps.”
- “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
grinding
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The grinding aspect of the game is heavily criticized, with many users describing it as excessively grindy and requiring significant time investment, likening it to a second job or life. The game is primarily viewed as an achievement farming experience, with easy unlocks that contribute to a repetitive and tedious gameplay loop.
- “It's a bit grindy, but the rewards make it worth it.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding, but the sense of achievement is incredible.”
- “You'll need a second life, maybe some macros, and a will to live for grinding.”
- “This game exists for the sole reason of achievement farming.”
- “All it is is an achievement farming game.”
music
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
33%
50%
The game's music is noted for its modest yet charming soundtrack that provides a calming contrast to the challenging gameplay, enhancing the overall experience. While some players appreciate the decent quality of the music, others criticize it for being repetitive and overshadowed by gameplay issues.
- “Hell yea, it has some decent music!”
- “The accompanying soundtrack, while modest in composition, adds rhythm and pulse to the constant repetition of failure and retry.”
- “There’s a subtle charm in the way the game’s music contrasts the relentless tension of its design—pleasant, almost calming tunes that underscore the absurdity of how difficult things can become.”
- “Piece of garbage with bad hitboxes, short-loop music, bad graphics, no instructions and no fun at all.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is inconsistent; while some players find it interesting and funny, others feel that the attempts at humor and innovation ultimately miss the mark, resulting in a lackluster experience.
- “Interesting and funny game!”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that Gamemaker Studio is often associated with low-quality, retro-style games that are perceived as cash grabs, suggesting a prevalent sentiment that many titles created with this tool prioritize profit over quality.
- “In conclusion, this is a cash grab.”
- “Gamemaker Studio is most commonly used to make retro pixel shovelware and cash grabs.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The atmosphere is characterized by a sparse and functional art style that prioritizes geometry and hazards over immersive environmental details.
- “The art style is sparse and functional, focusing entirely on conveying geometry and hazards rather than atmosphere.”
- “The game lacks a cohesive atmosphere, making it feel more like a series of disconnected levels than an immersive world.”
- “Despite the potential for a rich environment, the overall ambiance feels flat and uninspired.”