What's under your blanket !?

About

What's under your blanket !? is a single player simulation game with comedy and erotic themes. It was developed by One Game Studio and was released on January 5, 2016. It received positive reviews from players.

What is this game? It is about a guy, who gets into an awkward situation in a not suitable moment, and tries to overcome it. We all faced such difficulties :)

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

81%

Audience ScoreBased on 570 reviews

humor51 positive mentions

grinding3 negative mentions

The game is hilariously funny and provides a good laugh, making it a great joke gift for friends.
It's a simple yet addictive clicker game that offers a unique and humorous take on a taboo subject.
For its low price, it delivers a surprisingly entertaining experience, especially for those who enjoy meme culture.

The gameplay is extremely repetitive and can become boring quickly, with no real depth or variety.
Many players experienced discomfort or pain from the excessive clicking required to play, leading to concerns about repetitive strain injuries.
The graphics and overall presentation are very basic, resembling a low-quality flash game rather than a polished product.

humor
53 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
96%
4%
The humor in the game is described as a mix of silly and toilet humor, appealing to those who enjoy lighthearted, absurd comedy. While many players find it initially funny and entertaining, opinions vary on its longevity, with some stating it becomes repetitive and loses its charm quickly. Overall, it is seen as a cheap, amusing time-killer that may not hold up for extended play.
- “A very funny game to play.”
- “Hilarious and fun time killer reflecting the life of a young curious boy, or could it be the curiosity of every guy in the world!?”
- “It's a funny as hell game.”
- “It's an unfunny one-liner at a dinner party you don't want to go to.”
- “Save your money... it becomes unfunny in a matter of seconds.”
gameplay
31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
80%
10%
The gameplay of the game is characterized by its simplicity and repetitive mechanics, often described as a basic click-fest with limited depth. While some players find it amusing and appreciate its humorous premise, many criticize it for being overly simplistic and lacking engaging content, leading to a short-lived experience. Overall, opinions are mixed, with some praising its unique concept and others deeming it a poor execution of a comedic idea.
- “Not much to say as I'm sure everyone who has seen the gameplay knows what it's about, and despite that topic being seen as quite vulgar, I have to say from a game developer perspective it's quite impressive with its low-detail drawings and animation to a quite silly premise. Yet this game also got plenty of attention, and the gameplay is quite solid and enjoyable.”
- “Very intense and quick gameplay with a unique story makes this game a must-have for anyone on Steam.”
- “Gameplay is simple but challenging.”
- “Simple mechanics and repetitive.”
- “Gameplay is boring and graphics are ok for what it is which is not much.”
- “Gameplay is laughably simple: click and click and click and try not to get the multiplier to 5, since that will cause your blanket to catch on fire or the bed (and other items) to be destroyed.”
graphics
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
60%
20%
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized, with many reviewers describing them as crude, poorly drawn, and reminiscent of low-quality, early digital art. While some players find the simplistic visuals amusing or fitting for the game's humorous intent, the overall consensus is that the graphics are subpar and detract from the experience. A few reviews, however, highlight impressive graphical fidelity in certain contexts, contrasting sharply with the majority's negative feedback.
- “Is a truly immersive, true to life experience, with stunning graphical fidelity and beautiful storytelling.”
- “Cutting edge graphics!”
- “Graphics - nextgen 4k + 200fps”
- “The graphics were drawn on Microsoft Paint.”
- “The artwork - no, you can't even call this artwork, it's an insult to any artwork.”
- “Think early South Park episodes involving Canadians and without the shadows behind the characters, and you have an idea of what the visuals of this effort look like, but a lot more crude and poorly drawn by hand.”
story
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
50%
14%
The game's story is described as a humorous and relatable exploration of teenage life, with some players finding it immersive and reflective of their own experiences. While the narrative may be simple and quirky, it effectively engages players with its lovable characters and intriguing premise, despite some critiques regarding its depth and appropriateness. Overall, it offers a unique blend of humor and personal connection, making it a memorable aspect of the game.
- “Is a truly immersive, true to life experience, with stunning graphical fidelity and beautiful storytelling.”
- “It immediately pulls you in from the first second with the lovable and funny characters and intriguing story.”
- “This game has a whacked storyline, but is sure to bring pleasure!”
- “The only 'story arc' is that you are a young guy trying to masturbate and you have to avoid getting caught or game over.”
- “But only if you want to go on a grand, tear-jerking (no pun intended), feels-inducing storytelling work of art video game for the measly price of under 5 dollars.”
music
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
50%
19%
The music in the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users criticizing it as generic and repetitive, often comparing it unfavorably to well-known poor-quality tracks. While some players found the soundtrack to have slight variations, the overall consensus is that it becomes annoying quickly, detracting from the gaming experience. A few users did appreciate certain aspects of the music, but these positive remarks were far outnumbered by complaints about its quality and repetitiveness.
- “The music is awesomely horrible lol”
- “The soundtrack is good so 0.99€ is totally worth it.”
- “Soundtrack - 1000000000000000000/10”
- “The music is repetitive and the sound effects are just horrible.”
- “The soundtrack has slight variations through levels, but overall it sticks to the same track that gets a tad bit annoying after a few minutes.”
- “Then this music, you hear only one single music track - this would not be so bad if the music were at least nice - but this generic music is worse than 'Anton aus Tirol' or the 'Kastelruther Spatzen'... (and they are worse) - well, you will say, why not turn off this crapload of music?”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
Overall, the game has a mixed reception regarding replayability; while some players find it highly enjoyable and worth revisiting multiple times, others criticize it for being repetitive and lacking in replay value.
- “This is a fun and funny little game with very high replayability value that will keep you coming back for more.”
- “There's so much replay value, it's insane.”
- “It's repetitive and has no replay value.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the arm wrestling segments after each level to be tedious and unfulfilling, as victories do not result in a satisfying outcome, leading to a sense of wasted effort.
- “The arm wrestling segments after every level are tedious, and the opponent's arm doesn't go down after you win, leaving you feeling like you've done nothing.”
- “Grinding in this game feels endless and repetitive, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “The constant need to grind for resources takes away from the enjoyment of the game, turning it into a chore.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is praised for its perfect optimization, indicating that it runs smoothly and efficiently across various systems without performance issues.
- “Perfect optimization.”
- “The game runs smoothly on all settings, showcasing excellent optimization.”
- “I appreciate how well the developers have optimized the gameplay for various hardware configurations.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with players reporting bugs that hinder gameplay, such as getting stuck on objects during critical moments. While some may argue that stealth is necessary, the overall experience is marred by these technical problems.
- “The only possible thing someone can use to defend this game is 'but you have to be stealthy.' Overall, the game is buggy. On the hospital stage, I had issues leaving the bed to shut the door (I seemed to get hung up on something), but getting back was not a problem.”
- “The game crashes frequently, making it nearly impossible to progress without losing progress.”
- “I encountered multiple glitches that caused me to fall through the map, which completely ruined my experience.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Many users express dissatisfaction with the monetization model, labeling it as a cash grab and falling short of expectations, with some referring to the game as a low-quality experience.
- “The monetization model feels exploitative, making it clear that the developers are more interested in profits than player experience.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind paywalls, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending extra money.”
- “The constant push for in-game purchases detracts from the overall enjoyment, turning what could be a great game into a cash grab.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is polarizing; while some players find it to be one of the most touching experiences available, others feel it lacks depth and recommend against it due to its perceived superficiality.
- “One of the greatest and most touching games of our time.”