Grass Simulator

About

Grass Simulator is a single player and multiplayer casual shooter game with a comedy theme. It was developed by Daniel Davies and was released on April 1, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

In Grass Simulator, play asprogrammer-created character Garry Rambler, a vengeful mercenary with a moustache and magnum revolver, in a purgatory filled with cows and grass. Fight cows in Classic Mode and groove to dubstep beats in Dubstep Cow Mode. Your mission: avenge your family's death at the hands of the illusive cows and the legendary cow god.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

57%

Audience ScoreBased on 658 reviews

graphics18 positive mentions

stability8 negative mentions

The game offers a unique and humorous experience with its quirky premise of shooting cows and watching grass grow.
Many players find the game entertaining for short bursts, especially in multiplayer mode with friends.
The dubstep mode and cow explosions provide a fun and absurd visual spectacle.

The game lacks substantial content and quickly becomes repetitive, with many players losing interest after a few minutes.
Graphics and gameplay mechanics are poorly executed, leading to a frustrating experience.
There are numerous bugs and performance issues, making it difficult to enjoy the game fully.

graphics
39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
46%
41%
13%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many praising the stunning visuals and immersive retro aesthetic, while others criticize the quality and optimization, noting issues like pixelation and bugs. Some players highlight the realistic depiction of elements like grass and cows, while others find the graphics lacking, comparing them unfavorably to older titles. Overall, the game's graphics seem to evoke strong reactions, ranging from admiration to disappointment.
- “The graphics are exquisite and immerse me completely, to the point where I forget that I am in the game world.”
- “The graphics are insane and the grass is very realistic.”
- “Stunning graphics, gorgeous level design and.. cows moo!”
- “Loud avant-garde music and 90s polygon graphics assault you from all directions, rendering you blind and deaf at the same time.”
- “Up close, it's just another basic system of models with 'photographic quality' textures that don't scale well, so you can see all the ugly stretching and pixelation when you take a really close look at the grass at your feet.”
- “The graphics are really bad and bugged.”
humor
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
89%
11%
The humor in this game is widely criticized, with many players finding it unfunny and lacking in genuine comedic value. While some moments, like the initial exploding cow, elicited laughter, the overall experience is described as dull and poorly executed, failing to deliver the engaging humor seen in similar titles like Goat Simulator. Ultimately, the game is seen more as a failed attempt at humor rather than a successful comedic experience.
- “Me and my friend spent a solid 5 minutes in the multiplayer and couldn't stop laughing.”
- “It's so dumb that it's funny.”
- “Just a funny simulator game and the cows are evil damn it....dubstep and cows (the best combination) and weed my bad I wanted to say grass :D although the developer seems to be on weed =))))”
- “This game is a joke that is not funny.”
- “You're not funny!”
- “It is not funny!”
music
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
64%
17%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising the energetic dubstep and disco tracks as enjoyable and fitting for the chaotic gameplay, while others criticize the loud and repetitive nature of the menu and in-game music. Many find the soundtrack to be a highlight, providing a unique auditory experience, though some feel it detracts from the overall enjoyment due to its obnoxiousness. Overall, the music is a polarizing aspect, with opinions ranging from enthusiastic appreciation to outright disdain.
- “The music is great, especially disco.”
- “I love the dubstep music!”
- “The soundtrack's pretty nice though.”
- “Loud avant-garde music and 90s polygon graphics assault you from all directions, rendering you blind and deaf at the same time.”
- “The menu music is loud and kind of weird; no decoration except grass, trees, and that one empty house. You can't even play as grass.”
- “There is no tutorial, there is no objective, the graphics are bad, and I'm not totally sure what the point of this game is other than to expose you to bad electronic music.”
gameplay
29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
28%
48%
24%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some praising its originality and addictive mechanics, while others criticize it for being repetitive and lacking depth. Players appreciate the stunning graphics and immersive experience, but many feel that the game falls short in providing meaningful content and engaging gameplay. Overall, it seems to be a polarizing experience, with some finding it enjoyable and others deeming it boring or lacking in real gameplay elements.
- “The action-packed gameplay is so original; I have never seen a game, no, a piece of art, so engrossing.”
- “It incorporates highly addictive mechanics from other popular shooters and provides the player with hours of gameplay.”
- “With simple controls, well-conceived mechanics, and stunning graphics, Grass Simulator is a perfect replacement for real-life grass!”
- “Its bugs and repetitive gameplay make it hard and awful to play, despite the amount of content it contains.”
- “No real gameplay to it but I regret getting Battlefield 4 through Origin (which I refunded) more than I regret getting this 4-pack on sale.”
- “Ive played worse games than this but it just goes to show honestly anyone can get their game on Steam these days... this game is just another one of those disappointments. I know early access means there isn't much content, but this is more of a walk around and do nothing kind of early access with no real gameplay, just like going into a museum and you're staring at stuff, not amusing at all 0/10.”
story
19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
16%
68%
16%
The game's story has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its emotional depth and complexity, likening it to works by Stephen King and Tolkien, while others criticize the lack of a traditional narrative structure, claiming it allows for personal storytelling. Many appreciate the branching choices that significantly impact the gameplay experience, although some find the length of the main story and numerous side quests overwhelming. Overall, the narrative aspect is seen as a defining feature, whether through its rich storytelling or the freedom to create one's own.
- “The storyline is better than Game of Thrones!”
- “It never ceases to amaze as there are many hidden easter eggs and the story is well polished and thought through.”
- “This is a story-driven RPG where your choices matter.”
- “You can't add a gun and leave out story/objective and be a game.”
- “There is no story, no intro, no video, no cutscene, no dialog at all.”
- “- no story :(”
stability
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is severely criticized, with numerous reports of bugs and glitches that hinder gameplay, such as unresponsive controls and freezing modes. Players describe it as a poorly optimized experience, often comparing it unfavorably to mundane activities like watching grass grow. Overall, the game is seen as a frustrating and unstable mess.
- “If you play the game for any slightly extended period of time, the game glitches so that none of the modes work until you exit the game (even the exit game button stops working).”
- “The game is also horribly buggy and runs like crap.”
- “A buggy mess lacking in stuff to do.”
emotional
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players have praised the game for its deeply emotional storytelling, with many expressing that the narrative's impactful moments, particularly the death of a beloved character, elicited strong feelings and tears. The stunning graphics and immersive world further enhance the emotional experience, making players feel a profound connection to both the characters and the environment. Overall, the game is described as a tear-jerking masterpiece that resonates on a heartfelt level.
- “If you want to have a tear-jerking, heartfelt experience, purchase this masterpiece.”
- “He was easily the best character and made me feel for everyone in the game.”
- “The beautiful graphics almost made me feel like I was in a real world, and of course, the sheer scale of this world I was in.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game's graphics are praised for their quality, and while some users report excellent optimization, others experience poor performance, indicating a need for further fixes and bug resolutions. Overall, the optimization appears inconsistent, with some players enjoying smooth gameplay while others face significant issues.
- “Graphics were incredible, the game was well optimized, and the story was on par with the likes of Stephen King.”
- “The second thing you will notice is absolutely insane performance.”
- “Additionally, the performance is poor.”
- “Just performance fixes and maybe some bug fixes.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized as a cash grab, with users feeling that the 99-cent purchase offers little value and lacks substantial content.
- “99 cents down the drain, to be honest. It's just a cash grab game with no content.”
- “The monetization is so aggressive that it ruins the overall experience.”
- “I feel like I'm being constantly pushed to spend money just to enjoy the game.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Reviewers highlight that the game's replayability largely depends on player creativity, suggesting that the immersive and realistic elements, such as the cows, enhance the overall experience.
- “The replayability is limited only by your imagination, and the attention to detail is impressive.”
- “Each playthrough offers new experiences and challenges, making it a game you can return to time and again.”
- “The variety of choices and outcomes ensures that no two runs are ever the same.”
- “The replayability is limited; once you've completed the main story, there's not much incentive to dive back in.”
- “After finishing the game, I found little reason to replay it, as the side quests felt repetitive and uninspired.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices and consequences makes replaying the game feel like a chore rather than an adventure.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the blend of battlefield mechanics with farming simulation, drawing parallels to popular titles like Euro Truck Simulator 2 and Farming Simulator 2017. This combination offers a unique experience that appeals to fans of both genres, suggesting that grinding in this game can be enjoyable for those who appreciate the farming aspect.
- “This is the new battlefield mixed with farming sim.”
- “Look no further if you've already fallen in love with hit titles such as Euro Truck Simulator 2 or Farming Simulator 2017, as I have.”