Weable 2

About

"Weable 2" is a first-person puzzle-platformer game where players manipulate colors to interact with the environment. Progression requires solving increasingly complex puzzles using the game's unique color-based mechanics. Players can expect various challenges that test their problem-solving skills and reaction time.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

60%

Audience ScoreBased on 30 reviews

gameplay2 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

The game offers a unique twist on classic gameplay, providing a challenging experience that can be enjoyable for short sessions.
Many players found it to be a relaxing and fun way to spend a couple of hours, with some even considering it a great value for the price.
The visual design and neon style received praise, contributing to an interesting aesthetic that appeals to fans of retro arcade games.

The controls are often described as poor, with issues like slippery movement and unfair hitboxes that detract from the gameplay experience.
Technical shortcomings, such as lack of resolution options and minimalistic graphics, make the game feel unpolished and not up to modern standards.
Many players reported that the game quickly becomes repetitive and boring, with levels that lack variety and engaging content.

graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The graphics of the game have been criticized for their low quality and lack of customization options, including the inability to change resolution or adjust settings. This has led to disappointment among PC gamers who expect a higher visual standard. Overall, the graphics are seen as subpar and not reflective of the capabilities of the platform.
- “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
- “There's no options to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
- “There's no way for gamers to try to improve the low-quality graphics.”
- “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high-quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The gameplay is considered decent for a short experience, offering about two hours of entertainment for a low price of $1.59. However, some users suggest exploring other games like No More Heroes or Fortnite for a more engaging experience.
- “It's just gameplay.”
- “Pretty good for a single night: 2 hours of gameplay for $1.59. That's the good stuff!”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The game lacks a narrative, with users noting that there is no story present.
- “There is no story to speak of.”
- “The game lacks any meaningful narrative.”
- “The storyline is completely absent.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is praised for its low price point and lack of in-game purchases, with players appreciating its non-pay-to-win model and absence of toxic elements. The monetization approach is seen as refreshing, allowing for an enjoyable single-player experience without additional costs.
- “Bought it for €0.25, played for 7 minutes straight, had the best time of my life, no regrets. Flawless game, game of the year candidate. Absolutely not pay-to-win, not developed by EA or Ubisoft, no in-game purchases, no toxic players. Fantastically well thought out single-player mode, definitely more relaxing than weird ASMR videos.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music in the game is criticized for frequently stopping and failing to restart promptly, contributing to an overall negative experience. Many players find the repetitive nature of the levels and the lack of engaging audio detracts from the enjoyment of the game.
- “The music continuously stops and doesn't start playing for a while, making the experience frustrating.”
- “Most of the levels feature the same traps, which makes the gameplay monotonous and unengaging.”
- “It's not fun unless you're just playing the game to review how unfun it is.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players indicate that grinding in the game can be quite demanding, often requiring significant time investment or multiple attempts to progress effectively.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
- “I spent hours grinding, and it felt like I made no progress.”