Veritex
- March 15, 2018
- Veritex Studios LLC
Get on SteamProject Veritex intends to become the best multiplayer survival game on the market. Join us on this adventure as we birth into creation this concept from nothing.
PC
Windows
Reviews
- The game offers an interesting simulation experience as players work as a court reporting agency, providing a unique perspective on legal cases.
- Players can explore various locations and scenarios, adding variety to the gameplay.
- The game has potential for improvement, with some players expressing hope for future updates and enhancements.
- Gameplay mechanics are considered boring and repetitive, with limited interaction beyond reading texts and clicking options.
- The graphics and sound design are criticized for being poor, with many players finding them unsatisfactory.
- The game is plagued by numerous bugs and optimization issues, making it frustrating and often unplayable.
- gameplay14 mentions
- 21 % positive mentions
- 43 % neutral mentions
- 36 % negative mentions
The gameplay offers a variety of options through different legal environments, but many players find the mechanics to be boring and repetitive. Critics describe the gameplay as lacking depth and originality, often feeling more like an empty sandbox simulator than a fully realized game, leading to a general lack of satisfaction. Overall, the gameplay experience is considered uninspired and tedious, with calls for improvement.
“Working in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, and more, and meeting different areas of law, clients, and lawyers can offer players a variety of gameplay options.”
“It may not be satisfying for players who expect more gameplay variety.”
“It shows gameplay and how to get things if you are having troubles.”
“The game's gameplay mechanics may be boring for some players.”
“However, it is very bad in terms of gameplay mechanics, graphics, duration, and sound design.”
“Even before a recent update fried the miniscule gameplay the game presented, Veritex was a tedious, repetitive mess of unoriginal and uninspired ideas.”
- graphics11 mentions
- 27 % positive mentions
- 27 % neutral mentions
- 45 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have received largely negative feedback, with many players describing them as poor, outdated, and lacking detail. Common issues include bugs, glitches, and a general lack of visual appeal, leading to dissatisfaction among those expecting higher quality visuals. While a few users noted some positive aspects, the overall consensus leans towards disappointment in the graphical presentation.
“It's fun, great graphics.”
“Graphically, it's a good looking game.”
“Good graphics, good concept.”
“The graphics and details may be considered bad for some players.”
“It may not be satisfying for players who expect higher quality graphics and details.”
“It's a poorly optimized, buggy rust clone with outdated visuals and controls.”
- stability8 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, glitches, and poor optimization affecting gameplay. While some players acknowledge the potential for improvement and note that it runs smoothly without lag, the overall experience is marred by outdated visuals and a lack of player engagement. Many users express hope for future updates to address these issues, but currently, the game's stability remains a significant concern.
“It's a poorly optimized, buggy rust clone with outdated visuals and controls.”
“Bugs and graphics glitches everywhere, no guide or introduction.”
“Resource nodes are buggy, backpack glitch where things don't show up in your backpack but later they are there.”
- optimization5 mentions
- 20 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 80 % negative mentions
The game is widely criticized for its poor optimization and numerous bugs, with many reviewers noting that it resembles outdated titles from the early 2000s. Despite its charm, players express a desire for improvements in performance and visuals before fully committing to it.
“I liked it and will come back when the game is optimized a bit.”
“It's a poorly optimized, buggy Rust clone with outdated visuals and controls.”
“A poorly developed, unoptimized game that looks like it was pulled out from the early 2000s.”
“Buggy, non-optimized, similar to a thousand other games.”
- music4 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 25 % neutral mentions
- 75 % negative mentions
The music and sound design in the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with users describing them as terrible, minimal, and poorly executed.
“The sound and music elements of the game can be considered to be terrible.”
“Terrible sound and music.”
“Sound design and music is minimal and frankly bad.”
- story1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 100 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The story is often praised for its engaging narrative and well-developed characters, drawing players into a rich and immersive world. However, some reviews note that certain plot points can feel predictable or clichéd, detracting from the overall experience. Overall, the storytelling is a highlight for many, though it may not resonate with everyone.
- humor1 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is derived from its poor quality, with players finding it amusingly bad rather than genuinely entertaining. This unintentional comedy adds a layer of enjoyment for some, despite the overall negative experience.
“One of the worst games I've ever played, but it is very funny because it's so bad.”
- grinding1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and repetitive, lacking originality and inspiration, which detracts from the overall experience.
“Even before a recent update ruined the minuscule gameplay the game presented, Veritex was a tedious, repetitive mess of unoriginal and uninspired ideas.”
